Literature DB >> 21481564

Trabecular metal used for major bone loss in acetabular hip revision.

Jonah Hebert Davies1, G Yves Laflamme, Josee Delisle, Julio Fernandes.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of trabecular metal (TM) acetabular components used in revision hip arthroplasty with major bone deficiency. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 46 patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty with severe acetabular bone loss. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Harris Hip Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities, and Short-Form 12. Mean follow-up was 50 months. All patients had Paprosky type IIc or III acetabular bone deficiency. Major complications included 1 infection, 2 dislocations, and 1 arterial bleeding. Average Harris Hip Score was 78.2. Short-Form 12 scores were within population-based age-matched averages. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities scores were mainly in the 2 lowest disability categories. Porous tantalum shows promising results in revision arthroplasty with severe acetabular bone loss.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21481564     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.02.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  25 in total

1.  Uncemented Porous Tantalum Acetabular Components: Early Follow-Up and Failures in 599 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties.

Authors:  William J Long; Nicolas O Noiseux; Tad M Mabry; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

2.  [Modular reconstruction in acetabular revision with antiprotrusio cages and metal augments : the cage-and-augment system].

Authors:  K-P Günther; T Wegner; S Kirschner; A Hartmann
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  [Revision implants of the future: trends and new developments].

Authors:  S Winkler; F-X Köck; C Baier; H-R Springorum; A Beifuss; P Lechler; J Grifka; J Schaumburger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Robert Pivec; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Reconstruction options for acetabular revision.

Authors:  Erica D Taylor; James A Browne
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-07-18

6.  Acetabular revision arthroplasty using trabecular titanium implants.

Authors:  Boris Steno; Milan Kokavec; Libor Necas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss?

Authors:  Carl C Berasi; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Erin L Ruh; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Do revision total hip augments provide appropriate modularity?

Authors:  Matthew G Teeter; Douglas D R Naudie; James L Howard; Richard W McCalden; Steven J MacDonald
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  CORR Insights®: Does the Risk of Rerevision Vary Between Porous Tantalum Cups and Other Cementless Designs After Revision Hip Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Smoking may be a harbinger of early failure with ultraporous metal acetabular reconstruction.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Ryan C Jefferson; Michael A Sneller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.