Literature DB >> 20676821

[Reconstruction of large acetabular defects using trabecular metal augments].

Olaf Hasart1, Carsten Perka, Rex Lehnigk, Stephan Tohtz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Revision of cup and reconstruction of original center of rotation. High primary and secondary stability. Prevention of additional bone loss. INDICATIONS: Osseous defects at the anterior-cranial, cranial and posterior-cranial rim of acetabulum. Larger cavitary, medial or oval defects (Paprosky IIb-IIIb). Segmental defects (anterior column up to half of host bone, posterior column up to one third of host bone). CONTRAINDICATIONS: Infection of total hip arthroplasty. Pelvic discontinuity (Paprosky IV). SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Exposure of acetabulum and detection of defects. Complete removal of soft tissue from acetabulum, reaming of sclerotic bone, if necessary. Adaptation of trial augments to close an oval defect to a round defect and to reach an uncontained defect, respectively. Adaptation of trial cup. In case of sufficient stability, fixation of final augment with two or three screws in cranial bone stock. The screws should be directed to iliosacral joint. Augmentation with allogenic bone chips is possible in the region of wedge and acetabulum as well. Sealing of rough augment surface with bone cement. Implantation of cup, fixation with screws. Application of insert. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Depending on bone defects, full weight bearing is possible. In cases of severe bone defects, reduction of weight bearing to 20 kg for 6 weeks is recommended. Postoperative physiotherapy is possible in most cases.
RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2007, 38 patients with acetabular defects type IIIa und IIIb according to Paprosky underwent reconstruction using the TMT system (Trabecular Metal Technology). After 25 months, a significant functional improvement was seen in all patients. The Merle d'Aubigné Score increased from 6 points preoperatively to 13 points postoperatively, the Harris Hip Score from 29 to 78 points. Two revisions were necessary because of loosening or migration of the cup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20676821     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-010-8026-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  19 in total

1.  Long-term porous-coated cup survivorship using spikes, screws, and press-fitting for initial fixation.

Authors:  Charles A Engh; Robert H Hopper; C Anderson Engh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  The use of tantalum porous metal implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B defects.

Authors:  Steven H Weeden; Robert H Schmidt
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Eight- to ten-year clinical and radiographic outcome of a porous tantalum monoblock acetabular component.

Authors:  George Macheras; Konstantinos Kateros; Athanassios Kostakos; Stefanos Koutsostathis; Dimitrios Danomaras; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  High failure rate of bulk femoral head allografts in total hip acetabular reconstructions at 10 years.

Authors:  L M Kwong; M Jasty; W H Harris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Unsatisfactory results with the cementless Omnifit acetabular component due to polyethylene and severe osteolysis.

Authors:  Jeroen J Nieuwenhuis; Jan de Waal Malefijt; Jan C M Hendriks; Taco Gosens; Michel Bonnet
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.500

6.  Cementless sockets: optimums and outcomes.

Authors:  W G Paprosky
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.390

7.  Salvage total hip reconstruction in patients with major acetabular bone deficiency using structural femoral head allografts.

Authors:  M Jasty; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-01

8.  Total hip arthroplasty with use of an acetabular reinforcement ring in patients who have congenital dysplasia of the hip. Results at five to fifteen years.

Authors:  T J Gill; J B Sledge; M E Müller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Initial stability of porous coated acetabular implants. The effect of screw placement, screw tightness, defect type, and oversize implants.

Authors:  M H Hadjari; J M Hollis; O E Hofmann; C M Flahiff; C L Nelson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexander Siegmeth; Clive P Duncan; Bassam A Masri; Winston Y Kim; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  6 in total

1.  [Modular reconstruction in acetabular revision with antiprotrusio cages and metal augments : the cage-and-augment system].

Authors:  K-P Günther; T Wegner; S Kirschner; A Hartmann
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 2.  Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Robert Pivec; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Smoking may be a harbinger of early failure with ultraporous metal acetabular reconstruction.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Ryan C Jefferson; Michael A Sneller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Benvindo Rosal da Fonseca Neto; Marcos Murilo Santana Lima; Bruno Tavares Rabello; Leonardo da Silva Sena; Luiz Carlos Zacaron Júnior; Maurício Tarrago Viana
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-12-06

5.  On-Growth and In-Growth Osseointegration Enhancement in PM Porous Ti-Scaffolds by Two Different Bioactivation Strategies: Alkali Thermochemical Treatment and RGD Peptide Coating.

Authors:  Katrin Steffanie Rappe; Monica Ortiz-Hernandez; Miquel Punset; Meritxell Molmeneu; Albert Barba; Carles Mas-Moruno; Jordi Guillem-Marti; Cristina Caparrós; Elisa Rupérez; José Calero; María-Cristina Manzanares; Javier Gil; Jordi Franch
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Evaluation of the fixation of the trabecular metal wedge in patients undergoing revision of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Victor Magalhães Callado; Osamu de Sandes Kimura; Diogo de Carvalho Leal; Pedro Guilme Teixeira de Sousa Filho; Marco Bernardo Cury Fernandes; Emílio Henrique Carvalho de Almendra Freitas
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2014-05-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.