Literature DB >> 28054110

[Periprosthetic acetabular fractures in geriatric patients].

S C Herath1, M F R Rollmann2, T Histing2, J H Holstein2, T Pohlemann2.   

Abstract

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures in geriatric patients are rare injuries; however, the incidence is increasing because of the current demographic developments. For diagnosis of periprosthetic acetabular fractures, conventional X‑ray images are regularly complemented by computed tomography (CT). For exclusion of loosening of the prosthesis more advanced techniques, such as single photon emission CT (SPECT/CT) are applied. In addition to classification of periprosthetic acetabular fractures by the traditional system of Letournel there are several other classification systems, which take into account the etiology of the fracture and the stability of the prosthesis. While, under certain circumstances conservative treatment of periprosthetic acetabular fractures is possible, operative treatment often requires extensive surgical procedures to restore the stability of the acetabulum as a support for the cup of the prosthesis. Besides the traditional techniques of acetabular osteosynthesis, special revision systems, augmentations and allografts are used for the reconstruction of periprosthetic acetabular fractures. To determine a therapeutic regimen patient-specific preconditions as well as fracture pattern and type of prosthesis need to be taken into account. In the literature there are several algorithms, which are aimed at supporting the attending physician in making the correct decision for the treatment of periprosthetic acetabular fractures. In cases of periprosthetic acetabular fractures even experienced surgeons are faced with great challenges. Thus, treatment should be carried out in specialized centers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabulum; Hip; Periprosthetic fracture; Prosthesis; Treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28054110     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-016-0340-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  33 in total

1.  Acute periprosthetic fracture of the acetabulum associated with osteolytic pelvic lesions: a report of 3 cases.

Authors:  J Sánchez-Sotelo; B J McGrory; D J Berry
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Artificial hip prosthesis in acute and nonunion fractures of the femoral neck: follow-up study of seventy cases.

Authors:  I B HORWITZ; M I LENOBEL
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1954-06-05

Review 3.  Role of Cages in Revision Arthroplasty of the Acetabulum.

Authors:  Tatu J Mäkinen; Paul Kuzyk; Oleg A Safir; David Backstein; Allan E Gross
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Treatment algorithm of acetabular periprosthetic fractures.

Authors:  Paul Simon; Philipp von Roth; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Mid-term results in relation to age and analysis of predictive factors after fixation of acetabular fractures using the modified Stoppa approach.

Authors:  J D Bastian; M Tannast; K A Siebenrock; M J B Keel
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 6.  [Periprosthetic Acetabulum Fractures].

Authors:  A J Schreiner; F Stuby; P M de Zwart; B G Ochs
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 0.923

7.  Fractures of the acetabulum in patients aged 60 years and older: an epidemiological and radiological study.

Authors:  T A Ferguson; R Patel; M Bhandari; J M Matta
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-02

Review 8.  Loosening after acetabular revision: comparison of trabecular metal and reinforcement rings. A systematic review.

Authors:  Nicholas A Beckmann; Stefan Weiss; Matthias C M Klotz; Matthias Gondan; Sebastian Jaeger; Rudi G Bitsch
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 9.  Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum associated with a total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Craig J Della Valle; Nathan G Momberger; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2003

10.  Rationales for the Bernese approaches in acetabular surgery.

Authors:  M J B Keel; T M Ecker; K-A Siebenrock; J D Bastian
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.