Literature DB >> 24402896

Improved measurement of acoustic output using complex deconvolution of hydrophone sensitivity.

Keith A Wear, Paul M Gammell, Subha Maruvada, Yunbo Liu, Gerald R Harris.   

Abstract

The traditional method for calculating acoustic pressure amplitude is to divide a hydrophone output voltage measurement by the hydrophone sensitivity at the acoustic working frequency, but this approach neglects frequency dependence of hydrophone sensitivity. Another method is to perform a complex deconvolution between the hydrophone output waveform and the hydrophone impulse response (the inverse Fourier transform of the sensitivity). In this paper, the effects of deconvolution on measurements of peak compressional pressure (p+), peak rarefactional pressure (p_), and pulse intensity integral (PII) are studied. Time-delay spectrometry (TDS) was used to measure complex sensitivities from 1 to 40 MHz for 8 hydrophones used in medical ultrasound exposimetry. These included polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) spot-poled membrane, needle, capsule, and fiber-optic designs. Subsequently, the 8 hydrophones were used to measure a 4-cycle, 3 MHz pressure waveform mimicking a pulsed Doppler waveform. Acoustic parameters were measured for the 8 hydrophones using the traditional approach and deconvolution. Average measurements (across all 8 hydrophones) of acoustic parameters from deconvolved waveforms were 4.8 MPa (p+), 2.4 MPa (p_), and 0.21 mJ/cm(2) (PII). Compared with the traditional method, deconvolution reduced the coefficient of variation (ratio of standard deviation to mean across all 8 hydrophones) from 29% to 8% (p+), 39% to 13% (p_), and 58% to 10% (PII).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24402896      PMCID: PMC6931379          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2014.6689776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  20 in total

1.  1-3 piezoelectric composite transducers for swept-frequency calibration of hydrophones from 100 kHz to 2 MHz.

Authors:  Gerald R Harris; Paul M Gammell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Interlaboratory evaluation of hydrophone sensitivity calibration from 0.1 to 2 MHz via time delay spectrometry.

Authors:  Gerald R Harris; Paul M Gammell; Peter A Lewin; Emil G Radulescu
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Calibration of hydrophones based on reciprocity and time delay spectrometry.

Authors:  G Ludwig; K Brendel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Application of time-delay spectrometry for calibration of ultrasonic transducers.

Authors:  P C Pederson; P A Lewin; L Bjorno
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  A model of the effects of hydrophone and amplifier frequency response on ultrasound exposure measurements.

Authors:  G R Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  A Fabry-Perot fiber-optic ultrasonic hydrophone for the simultaneous measurement of temperature and acoustic pressure.

Authors:  Paul Morris; Andrew Hurrell; Adam Shaw; Edward Zhang; Paul Beard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Are current hydrophone low frequency response standards acceptable for measuring mechanical/cavitation indices?

Authors:  G R Harris
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  Time-delay spectrometry measurement of magnitude and phase of hydrophone response.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Paul M Gammell; Subha Maruvada; Yunbo Liu; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Membrane hydrophone phase characteristics through nonlinear acoustics measurements.

Authors:  Philip E Bloomfield; Gaurav Gandhi; Peter A Lewin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Hydrophone measurements in diagnostic ultrasound fields.

Authors:  G R Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.725

View more
  23 in total

1.  Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part I: Spatiotemporal Transfer Function and Graphical Guide.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part II: Experimental Validation of Spatial Averaging Model.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Yunbo Liu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Variation of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound (HITU) Pressure Field Characterization: Effects of Hydrophone Choice, Nonlinearity, Spatial Averaging and Complex Deconvolution.

Authors:  Yunbo Liu; Keith A Wear; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Correction for frequency-dependent hydrophone response to nonlinear pressure waves using complex deconvolution and rarefactional filtering: application with fiber optic hydrophones.

Authors:  Keith Wear; Yunbo Liu; Paul M Gammell; Subha Maruvada; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of Membrane Hydrophones: Theory Versus Experiment.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Christian Baker; Piero Miloro
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Shock formation and nonlinear saturation effects in the ultrasound field of a diagnostic curvilinear probe.

Authors:  Maria M Karzova; Petr V Yuldashev; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Vera A Khokhlova; Bryan W Cunitz; Wayne Kreider; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Quantifying Image Quality Improvement Using Elevated Acoustic Output in B-Mode Harmonic Imaging.

Authors:  Yufeng Deng; Mark L Palmeri; Ned C Rouze; Gregg E Trahey; Clare M Haystead; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Correction for Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circular Sources.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of a Reflectance-Based Fiber-Optic Hydrophone: Predictions From Theoretical Models Compared With Measurements.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Samuel M Howard
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Evaluating the Benefit of Elevated Acoustic Output in Harmonic Motion Estimation in Ultrasonic Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging.

Authors:  Yufeng Deng; Mark L Palmeri; Ned C Rouze; Clare M Haystead; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.