Literature DB >> 28755792

Quantifying Image Quality Improvement Using Elevated Acoustic Output in B-Mode Harmonic Imaging.

Yufeng Deng1, Mark L Palmeri2, Ned C Rouze2, Gregg E Trahey3, Clare M Haystead4, Kathryn R Nightingale2.   

Abstract

Tissue harmonic imaging has been widely used in abdominal imaging because of its significant reduction in acoustic noise compared with fundamental imaging. However, tissue harmonic imaging can be limited by both signal-to-noise ratio and penetration depth during clinical imaging, resulting in decreased diagnostic utility. A logical approach would be to increase the source pressure, but the in situ pressures used in diagnostic ultrasound are subject to a de facto upper limit based on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration guideline for the mechanical index (<1.9). A recent American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine report concluded that an effective mechanical index ≤4.0 could be warranted without concern for increased risk of cavitation in non-fetal tissues without gas bodies, but would only be justified if there were a concurrent improvement in image quality and diagnostic utility. This work evaluates image quality differences between normal and elevated acoustic output hepatic harmonic imaging using a transmit frequency of 1.8 MHz. The results indicate that harmonic imaging using elevated acoustic output leads to modest improvements (3%-7%) in contrast-to-noise ratio of hypo-echoic hepatic vessels and increases in imaging penetration depth on the order of 4 mm per mechanical index increase of 0.1 for a given focal depth. Difficult-to-image patients who suffer from poor ultrasound image quality exhibited larger improvements than easy-to-image study participants.
Copyright © 2017 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elevated acoustic output; Harmonic imaging; Mechanical Index journal: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28755792      PMCID: PMC5580090          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  24 in total

1.  Specification of acoustic output level and measurement uncertainty in ultrasonic exposimetry.

Authors:  Marvin C Ziskin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 2.  The risk of exposure to diagnostic ultrasound in postnatal subjects: nonthermal mechanisms.

Authors:  Charles C Church; Edwin L Carstensen; Wesley L Nyborg; Paul L Carson; Leon A Frizzell; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Finite amplitude distortion-based inhomogeneous pulse echo ultrasonic imaging.

Authors:  T Christopher
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Tissue harmonic imaging: why does it work?

Authors:  J D Thomas; D N Rubin
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 5.  Challenges of imaging for cancer in patients with diabetes and obesity.

Authors:  Michal Klysik; Samita Garg; Sajal Pokharel; Jeffery Meier; Nayana Patel; Kavita Garg
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Characterization of primary and secondary malignant liver lesions from B-mode ultrasound.

Authors:  Jitendra Virmani; Vinod Kumar; Naveen Kalra; Niranjan Khandelwal
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 7.  Conditionally Increased Acoustic Pressures in Nonfetal Diagnostic Ultrasound Examinations Without Contrast Agents: A Preliminary Assessment.

Authors:  Kathryn R Nightingale; Charles C Church; Gerald Harris; Keith A Wear; Michael R Bailey; Paul L Carson; Hui Jiang; Kurt L Sandstrom; Thomas L Szabo; Marvin C Ziskin
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  A theoretical study of inertial cavitation from acoustic radiation force impulse imaging and implications for the mechanical index.

Authors:  Charles C Church; Cecille Labuda; Kathryn Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Should the mechanical index be revised for ARFI imaging?

Authors:  Charles C Church; Cecille Labuda; Kathryn Nightingale
Journal:  IEEE Int Ultrason Symp       Date:  2012-10-07

10.  Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update.

Authors:  Jordi Bruix; Morris Sherman
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 17.425

View more
  10 in total

1.  Simultaneous Axial Multifocal Imaging Using a Single Acoustical Transmission: A Practical Implementation.

Authors:  Asaf Ilovitsh; Tali Ilovitsh; Josquin Foiret; Douglas N Stephens; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  MimickNet, Mimicking Clinical Image Post- Processing Under Black-Box Constraints.

Authors:  Ouwen Huang; Will Long; Nick Bottenus; Marcelo Lerendegui; Gregg E Trahey; Sina Farsiu; Mark L Palmeri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Correction for Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circular Sources.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part I: Theory and Impact on Diagnostic Safety Indexes.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 5.  Novel Uses of Ultrasound to Assess Kidney Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Matthew W Urban; Andrew D Rule; Thomas D Atwell; Shigao Chen
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2021-07-01

6.  Spatiotemporal Deconvolution of Hydrophone Response for Linear and Nonlinear Beams-Part I: Theory, Spatial-Averaging Correction Formulas, and Criteria for Sensitive Element Size.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 7.  Production of acoustic radiation force using ultrasound: methods and applications.

Authors:  Matthew W Urban
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.166

8.  Pressure Pulse Distortion by Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones due to Nonuniform Sensitivity.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Yunbo Liu; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  On the Relationship between Spatial Coherence and In Situ Pressure for Abdominal Imaging.

Authors:  Bofeng Zhang; Gianmarco F Pinton; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Quantifying the Effect of Abdominal Body Wall on In Situ Peak Rarefaction Pressure During Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging.

Authors:  Bofeng Zhang; Gianmarco F Pinton; Yufeng Deng; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 3.694

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.