Literature DB >> 18290135

Hydrophone measurements in diagnostic ultrasound fields.

G R Harris1.   

Abstract

Some of the methods, calculations, and problems associated with making hydrophone measurements in diagnostic ultrasound fields are considered. Several organizations have proposed definitions of various peak and average intensities that need to be specified when characterizing medical ultrasound fields. All of these can be determined from hydrophone measurements, but the bandwidths encountered (>50 MHz), along with the small focal diameters achievable ( approximately 1 mm), can place great demands on hydrophone performance. Two general types of hydrophones are available-the spot-poled membrane and needle types. Both employ the piezopolymer polyvinylidine fluoride (PVDF), and for the most part they have effective dimensions in the 0.5-1.0-mm range. Hydrophones can be made with useful bandwidths extending beyond 50 MHz. However, above approximately 15 MHz the nature of the response becomes highly dependent on the method of construction and PVDF film thickness used, as well as the characteristics of any associated preamplifier circuitry. Other factors that can affect measurement accuracy are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  1988        PMID: 18290135     DOI: 10.1109/58.4157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  14 in total

1.  A comparison of light spot hydrophone and fiber optic probe hydrophone for lithotripter field characterization.

Authors:  N Smith; G N Sankin; W N Simmons; R Nanke; J Fehre; P Zhong
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.523

2.  A method for accurate in silico modeling of ultrasound transducer arrays.

Authors:  Drake A Guenther; William F Walker
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part I: Spatiotemporal Transfer Function and Graphical Guide.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Improved measurement of acoustic output using complex deconvolution of hydrophone sensitivity.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Paul M Gammell; Subha Maruvada; Yunbo Liu; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Variation of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound (HITU) Pressure Field Characterization: Effects of Hydrophone Choice, Nonlinearity, Spatial Averaging and Complex Deconvolution.

Authors:  Yunbo Liu; Keith A Wear; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of Membrane Hydrophones: Theory Versus Experiment.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Christian Baker; Piero Miloro
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Correction for Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circular Sources.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part II: Validation for ARFI and Pulsed Doppler Waveforms.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Aoife M Ivory; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part I: Theory and Impact on Diagnostic Safety Indexes.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Stochastic precision analysis of 2D cardiac strain estimation in vivo.

Authors:  E A Bunting; J Provost; E E Konofagou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.