Literature DB >> 28735734

Variation of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound (HITU) Pressure Field Characterization: Effects of Hydrophone Choice, Nonlinearity, Spatial Averaging and Complex Deconvolution.

Yunbo Liu1, Keith A Wear2, Gerald R Harris2.   

Abstract

Reliable acoustic characterization is fundamental for patient safety and clinical efficacy during high-intensity therapeutic ultrasound (HITU) treatment. Technical challenges, such as measurement variation and signal analysis, still exist for HITU exposimetry using ultrasound hydrophones. In this work, four hydrophones were compared for pressure measurement: a robust needle hydrophone, a small polyvinylidene fluoride capsule hydrophone and two fiberoptic hydrophones. The focal waveform and beam distribution of a single-element HITU transducer (1.05 MHz and 3.3 MHz) were evaluated. Complex deconvolution between the hydrophone voltage signal and frequency-dependent complex sensitivity was performed to obtain pressure waveforms. Compressional pressure (p+), rarefactional pressure (p-) and focal beam distribution were compared up to 10.6/-6.0 MPa (p+/p-) (1.05 MHz) and 20.65/-7.20 MPa (3.3 MHz). The effects of spatial averaging, local non-linear distortion, complex deconvolution and hydrophone damage thresholds were investigated. This study showed a variation of no better than 10%-15% among hydrophones during HITU pressure characterization. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex deconvolution; HITU; Hydrophone; Nonlinearity; Spatial averaging; Variation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28735734      PMCID: PMC5639436          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  25 in total

1.  Experimental evaluation of indicators of nonlinearity for use in ultrasound transducer characterizations.

Authors:  Timothy A Bigelow; William D O'Brien
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Improved measurement of acoustic output using complex deconvolution of hydrophone sensitivity.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Paul M Gammell; Subha Maruvada; Yunbo Liu; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Thin film metal coated fiber optic hydrophone probe.

Authors:  Rupa Gopinath Minasamudram; Piyush Arora; Gaurav Gandhi; Afshin S Daryoush; Mahmoud A El-Sherif; Peter A Lewin
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 1.980

4.  Robust spot-poled membrane hydrophones for measurement of large amplitude pressure waveforms generated by high intensity therapeutic ultrasonic transducers.

Authors:  Volker Wilkens; Sven Sonntag; Olga Georg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Finite amplitude distortion of the pulsed fields used in diagnostic ultrasound.

Authors:  D R Bacon
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Time-delay spectrometry measurement of magnitude and phase of hydrophone response.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Paul M Gammell; Subha Maruvada; Yunbo Liu; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Spatial specificity and sensitivity of passive cavitation imaging for monitoring high-intensity focused ultrasound thermal ablation in ex vivo bovine liver.

Authors:  Kevin Haworth; Vasant A Salgaonkar; Nicholas M Corregan; Christy K Holland; T D Mast
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2013-06-02

8.  Effects on nonlinearity on the estimation of in situ values of acoustic output parameters.

Authors:  T L Szabo; F Clougherty; C Grossman
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Characterization of a multi-element clinical HIFU system using acoustic holography and nonlinear modeling.

Authors:  Wayne Kreider; Petr V Yuldashev; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Navid Farr; Ari Partanen; Michael R Bailey; Vera A Khokhlova
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  A comparison of acoustic cavitation detection thresholds measured with piezo-electric and fiber-optic hydrophone sensors.

Authors:  Victoria Bull; John Civale; Ian Rivens; Gail Ter Haar
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  15 in total

1.  Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part I: Spatiotemporal Transfer Function and Graphical Guide.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of Membrane Hydrophones: Theory Versus Experiment.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Christian Baker; Piero Miloro
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Correction for Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circular Sources.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Impact of High-Intensity Ultrasound on Strength of Surgical Mesh When Treating Biofilm Infections.

Authors:  Timothy A Bigelow; Clayton L Thomas; Huaiqing Wu; Kamal M F Itani
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Scan Parameter Optimization for Histotripsy Treatment of S. Aureus Biofilms on Surgical Mesh.

Authors:  Timothy A Bigelow; Clayton L Thomas; Huaiqing Wu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part II: Validation for ARFI and Pulsed Doppler Waveforms.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Aoife M Ivory; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part I: Theory and Impact on Diagnostic Safety Indexes.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of a Reflectance-Based Fiber-Optic Hydrophone: Predictions From Theoretical Models Compared With Measurements.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Samuel M Howard
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Pressure Pulse Distortion by Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones due to Nonuniform Sensitivity.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Yunbo Liu; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of Needle Hydrophones: Predictions From Four Theoretical Forms Compared With Measurements.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Christian Baker; Piero Miloro
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.