Literature DB >> 24337791

Clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation, computer-assisted surgery, and manual instrumentation: a short-term follow-up study.

Mark Yaffe1, Michael Luo, Nitin Goyal, Philip Chan, Anay Patel, Max Cayo, S David Stulberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed with patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), computer-assisted surgery (CAS), and manual instruments at short-term follow-up.
METHODS: 122 TKAs were performed by a single surgeon: 42 with PSI, 38 with CAS, and 40 with manual instrumentation. Preoperative, 1-month, and 6-month clinical and functional outcomes were measured using the Knee Society scoring system (knee score, function score, range of motion, and pain score). Improvements in clinical and functional outcomes from the preoperative to postoperative period were analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were measured to evaluate limb and component alignment.
RESULTS: Preoperative, 1-month postoperative, and 6-month postoperative knee scores, function scores, range of motion, and pain scores were highest in the PSI group compared to CAS and manual instrumentation. At 6-month follow-up, PSI TKA was associated with a statistically significant improvement in functional score when compared to manual TKA. Otherwise, there were no statistically significant differences in improvements among PSI, CAS, and manual TKA groups.
CONCLUSION: The higher preoperative scores in the PSI group limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions from the raw postoperative scores, but analyzing the changes in scores revealed that PSI was associated with a statistically significant improvement in Knee Society Functional score at 6-month post-TKA as compared to CAS or manual TKA. This may be attributable to improvements in component rotation and positioning, improved component size accuracy, or other factors that are not discernible on plain radiograph.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24337791     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-013-0968-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  34 in total

1.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique.

Authors:  H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; C Lüring; D Zurakowski; J Grifka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-07

2.  Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  A Ensini; F Catani; A Leardini; M Romagnoli; S Giannini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Three-dimensional component alignment and functional outcome in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study comparing two navigation systems.

Authors:  Paul Harvie; Karen Sloan; Richard J Beaver
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  J H Lonner; M T Laird; S A Stuchin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Bradley S Ellison; Jinjun Zhu; Erin L Ruh; Stephen M Howell; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA.

Authors:  Vincent Y Ng; Jeffrey H DeClaire; Keith R Berend; Bethany C Gulick; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Can computer assistance improve the clinical and functional scores in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Abelardo Suarez-Vazquez; Susana Iglesias-Fernandez
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Two-year outcomes of computed tomography-based and computed tomography free navigation for total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Arno Martin; A von Strempel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific templating.

Authors:  M A Hafez; K L Chelule; B B Seedhom; K P Sherman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The Columbus Knee System: 4-Year Results of a New Deep Flexion Design Compared to the NexGen Full Flex Implant.

Authors:  D Goebel; W Schultz
Journal:  Arthritis       Date:  2012-03-07
View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Patient specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a state of the art.

Authors:  Lorenzo Mattei; Pietro Pellegrino; Michel Calò; Alessandro Bistolfi; Filippo Castoldi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

Review 2.  No difference in mechanical alignment and femoral component placement between patient-specific instrumentation and conventional instrumentation in TKA.

Authors:  Huichao Fu; Jiaxing Wang; Shenyuan Zhou; Tao Cheng; Wen Zhang; Qi Wang; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Evaluation of the accuracy of resected bone thickness based on patient-specific instrumentation during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazumasa Yamamura; Fumiaki Inori; Sadahiko Konishi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Custom cutting guides in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Morad Chughtai; Anton Khlopas; Iyooh U Davidson; George A Yakubek; Kim L Stearns; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-05

Review 5.  Evaluation of the accuracy of patient-specific cutting blocks for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Etienne Cavaignac; Regis Pailhé; Gregoire Laumond; Jérôme Murgier; Nicolas Reina; Jean Michel Laffosse; Emilie Bérard; Philippe Chiron
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  [Total knee arthroplasty with 3D printing technique versus conventional surgery: comparison of the outcomes].

Authors:  Ming Niu; Fei Ma; Ju-Rong Ma; Jun-Wei Li; Xu-Nian Wu; Tong Wang; Yu-Liang Wang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-11-20

7.  Handheld Navigation Device and Patient-Specific Cutting Guides Result in Similar Coronal Alignment for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Michael E Steinhaus; Alexander S McLawhorn; Shawn S Richardson; Patrick Maher; David J Mayman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-02-29

Review 8.  Systematic review of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: new but not improved.

Authors:  Adam Sassoon; Denis Nam; Ryan Nunley; Robert Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Comparison between patient-specific instruments and conventional instruments and computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chun Hoi Yan; Kwong Yuen Chiu; Fu Yuen Ng; Ping Keung Chan; Christian Xinshuo Fang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with CT-based patient-specific instrumentation.

Authors:  Meng Zhu; Jerry Yongqiang Chen; Hwei Chi Chong; Andy Khye Soon Yew; Leon Siang Shen Foo; Shi-Lu Chia; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.