Literature DB >> 25217311

Comparison between patient-specific instruments and conventional instruments and computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Chun Hoi Yan1, Kwong Yuen Chiu2, Fu Yuen Ng2, Ping Keung Chan2, Christian Xinshuo Fang2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The current study investigated the accuracy in achieving proper lower limb alignment and individual component positions after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with 3 different instrumentation techniques. It was hypothesized that patient-specific instruments (PSI) would achieve more accurate lower limb alignment and component positions compared to conventional instruments (CON).
METHODS: Ninety knees in 81 patients were randomized in 1:1:1 ratio into CON, computer navigation (NAV) and PSI groups to receive TKA. The surgical routines were standardized. The lower limb mechanical axis and individual component positions were assessed on standard radiographs. Tourniquet time, operation time and patients' functional scores were documented.
RESULTS: Conventional instruments and PSI were more likely to result in an excessively flexed femoral component (p = 0.001) compared to NAV. Number of outliers in postoperative lower limb alignment, and other components positions in the coronal and sagittal plane showed no statistically significant difference. The mean tourniquet time and operation time was significantly shorter in CON and PSI groups than NAV group (p < 0.001). Four early complications occurred in the PSI group (p = 0.015). At 3-month follow-up, there was no difference in terms of the knee range of motion and patients' function among the 3 groups.
CONCLUSION: No significant radiological and clinical benefit could be demonstrated in using PSI over CON or NAV in TKA. Routine use of PSI is not recommended because of the extra cost and waiting time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Component position; Computer navigation; Functional outcomes; Lower limb alignment; Patient-specific instrumentation; Total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25217311     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3264-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  39 in total

1.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique.

Authors:  H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; C Lüring; D Zurakowski; J Grifka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-07

2.  Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment.

Authors:  Brian A Klatt; Nitin Goyal; Matthew S Austin; William J Hozack
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  A quantitative approach to radiography of the lower limb. Principles and applications.

Authors:  T D Cooke; R A Scudamore; J T Bryant; C Sorbie; D Siu; B Fisher
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-09

4.  CORR Insights ®: Is TKA using patient-specific instruments comparable to conventional TKA? A randomized controlled study of one system.

Authors:  Thomas J Blumenfeld
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Frontal plane knee alignment: a call for standardized measurement.

Authors:  T Derek V Cooke; Elizabeth A Sled; R Allan Scudamore
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.666

6.  Evaluation of the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation by navigation.

Authors:  Fabio Conteduca; Raffaele Iorio; Daniele Mazza; Ludovico Caperna; Gabriele Bolle; Giuseppe Argento; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Bradley S Ellison; Jinjun Zhu; Erin L Ruh; Stephen M Howell; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations.

Authors:  J H Bargren; J D Blaha; M A Freeman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA.

Authors:  Vincent Y Ng; Jeffrey H DeClaire; Keith R Berend; Bethany C Gulick; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instruments improves function and restores limb alignment in patients with extra-articular deformity.

Authors:  Emmanuel Thienpont; Frederic Paternostre; Martin Pietsch; Mahmoud Hafez; Stephen Howell
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Current state of the art in total knee arthroplasty computer navigation.

Authors:  Frederic Picard; Kamal Deep; Jean Yves Jenny
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Tourniquet application during TKA did not affect the accuracy of implant positioning: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Vera Stetzelberger; Udo Obertacke; Ahmed Jawhar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Favourable alignment outcomes with MRI-based patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Martijn G M Schotanus; Elke Thijs; Marion Heijmans; Rein Vos; Nanne P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  [Research progress on comparison of the application effects between personal specific instrumentation and computer-assisted navigation surgery in total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Ziyang Dong; Yang Li; Hua Tian
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-11-15

5.  PSI kinematic versus non-PSI mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Tilman Calliess; Kamil Bauer; Christina Stukenborg-Colsman; Henning Windhagen; Stefan Budde; Max Ettinger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with CT-based patient-specific instrumentation.

Authors:  Meng Zhu; Jerry Yongqiang Chen; Hwei Chi Chong; Andy Khye Soon Yew; Leon Siang Shen Foo; Shi-Lu Chia; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Computed tomography based 3D printed patient specific blocks for total knee replacement.

Authors:  Raju Vaishya; Vipul Vijay; Abhishek Vaish; Amit K Agarwal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-07-18

Review 8.  Patient-specific instrumentation does not improve radiographic alignment or clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Henricus J T A M Huijbregts; Riaz J K Khan; Emma Sorensen; Daniel P Fick; Samantha Haebich
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Comparison of an Accelerometer-Based Portable Navigation System, Patient-Specific Instrumentation, and Conventional Instrumentation for Femoral Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kohei Kawaguchi; Kazuhiko Michishita; Takeshi Manabe; Yoshiyuki Akasaka; Junya Higuchi
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-12-01

10.  No improvement in reducing outliers in coronal axis alignment with patient-specific instrumentation.

Authors:  Uwe Maus; Carlos J Marques; David Scheunemann; Frank Lampe; Djordje Lazovic; Hagen Hommel; Dennis Vogel; Martin Haunschild; Tilman Pfitzner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.