Literature DB >> 21874390

Can computer assistance improve the clinical and functional scores in total knee arthroplasty?

Daniel Hernández-Vaquero1, Abelardo Suarez-Vazquez, Susana Iglesias-Fernandez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical navigation in TKA facilitates better alignment; however, it is unclear whether improved alignment alters clinical evolution and midterm and long-term complication rates. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined the alignment differences between patients with standard, manual, jig-based TKAs and patients with navigation-based TKAs, and whether any differences would modify function, implant survival, and/or complications. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed 97 patients (100 TKAs) undergoing TKAs for minimal preoperative deformities. Fifty TKAs were performed with an image-free surgical navigation system and the other 50 with a standard technique. We compared femoral angle (FA), tibial angle (TA), and femorotibial angle (FTA) and determined whether any differences altered clinical or functional scores, as measured by the Knee Society Score (KSS), or complications. Seventy-three patients (75 TKAs) had a minimum followup of 8 years (mean, 8.3 years; range, 8-9.1 years).
RESULTS: All patients included in the surgical navigation group had a FTA between 177° and 182º. We found no differences in the KSS or implant survival between the two groups and no differences in complication rates, although more complications occurred in the standard technique group (seven compared with two in the surgical navigation group).
CONCLUSIONS: In the midterm, we found no difference in functional and clinical scores or implant survival between TKAs performed with and without the assistance of a navigation system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines online for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21874390      PMCID: PMC3210277          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2044-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  23 in total

1.  The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 Press Fit Condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  J Mahaluxmivala; M J Bankes; P Nicolai; C H Aldam; P W Allen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  The variability of intramedullary alignment of the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  William M Mihalko; James Boyle; Lindsey D Clark; Kenneth A Krackow
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Premature failure of the polyethylene tibial bearing surface of the Interax knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazuya Sugimoto; Makoto Iwai; Kohjiro Okahashi; Kohji Kaneko; Motonari Tanaka; Yoshinori Takakura
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Navigation in total knee arthroplasty. A multicenter study.

Authors:  F Maculé-Beneyto; D Hernández-Vaquero; J M Segur-Vilalta; R Colomina-Rodríguez; P Hinarejos-Gomez; I García-Forcada; B Seral Garcia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai Bauwens; Gerrit Matthes; Michael Wich; Florian Gebhard; Beate Hanson; Axel Ekkernkamp; Dirk Stengel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Authors:  J N Insall; L D Dorr; R D Scott; W N Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  [Are computer assisted total knee replacements more accurately placed? A meta-analysis of comparative studies].

Authors:  H Bäthis; S Shafizadeh; T Paffrath; C Simanski; J Grifka; C Lüring
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years.

Authors:  J M Spencer; S K Chauhan; K Sloan; A Taylor; R J Beaver
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-04

9.  Short-term outcome of 1,465 computer-navigated primary total knee replacements 2005-2008.

Authors:  Oystein Gøthesen; Birgitte Espehaug; Leif Havelin; Gunnar Petursson; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Complications of fixed infrared emitters in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Abelardo Suárez-Vázquez
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  27 in total

1.  Assessing the accuracy of patient-specific guides for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jong-Keun Seon; Hyeong-Won Park; Seung-Hyun Yoo; Eun-Kyoo Song
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Accuracy of manual instrumentation of tibial cutting guide in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Iorio; G Bolle; F Conteduca; L Valeo; J Conteduca; D Mazza; A Ferretti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Computer-assisted surgery improves rotational positioning of the femoral component but not the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero; Alfonso Noriega-Fernandez; Jose Manuel Fernandez-Carreira; Jose Manuel Fernandez-Simon; Jimena Llorens de los Rios
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation, computer-assisted surgery, and manual instrumentation: a short-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Mark Yaffe; Michael Luo; Nitin Goyal; Philip Chan; Anay Patel; Max Cayo; S David Stulberg
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Are MRI-based, patient matched cutting jigs as accurate as the tibial guides?

Authors:  Fabio Conteduca; Raffaele Iorio; Daniele Mazza; Ludovico Caperna; Gabriele Bolle; Giuseppe Argento; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Influence of computer navigation on TKA revision rates.

Authors:  Christoph Schnurr; Isabell Güdden; Peer Eysel; Dietmar Pierre König
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Evaluation of the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation by navigation.

Authors:  Fabio Conteduca; Raffaele Iorio; Daniele Mazza; Ludovico Caperna; Gabriele Bolle; Giuseppe Argento; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  [Computer-assisted systems in total knee arthroplasty. Useful aid or only additional costs].

Authors:  T Calliess; M Ettinger; H Windhagen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 10.  Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Harshvardhan Chawla; Leo Joskowicz; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.