Literature DB >> 25300397

Evaluation of the accuracy of patient-specific cutting blocks for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Etienne Cavaignac1, Regis Pailhé, Gregoire Laumond, Jérôme Murgier, Nicolas Reina, Jean Michel Laffosse, Emilie Bérard, Philippe Chiron.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Because published studies on the accuracy achieved with patient-specific guides during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) contradict each other, this systematic review and meta-analysis sought to compare radiological TKA outcomes when patient-specific cutting blocks (PSCB) were used to the outcomes when standard manual instrumentation was used.
METHODS: The meta-analysis was implemented according to PRISMA Statement Criteria. The primary endpoint was the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, which represents the leg's mechanical axis. The accuracy of component placement in the coronal and sagittal planes, and the accuracy of femoral component rotation were also compiled. After testing for publication bias and heterogeneity across studies, data were aggregated random-effects modeling when necessary.
RESULTS: Fifteen articles were included: 916 total knee arthroplasty cases in the PSCB group and 998 in the MI group. The mechanical axis did not differ between the two groups (weighted mean difference 0.07°; 95 % CI, -0.5° to 0.65°; p = 0.8). Risk ratio analysis revealed no protective effect of using PSCB relative to the appearance of HKA angle outliers (RR = 0.88; 95 % CI, 0.68-1.13; p = 0.3). There was a trend towards a protective effect with PSCB for the risk of femoral component outliers, but the opposite was observed for the tibial component. The implantation procedure was stopped in 30 cases because the surgeon-authors found excessive discrepancies between the intra-operative observations and the pre-operative plan.
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis found no evidence that using patient-specific cutting blocks provides superior accuracy to using manual instrumentation during TKA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25300397     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2549-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  52 in total

1.  Analysis of procedure-related costs and proposed benefits of using patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tyler Steven Watters; Richard C Mather; James A Browne; Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Michael P Bolognesi
Journal:  J Surg Orthop Adv       Date:  2011

2.  Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment.

Authors:  Brian A Klatt; Nitin Goyal; Matthew S Austin; William J Hozack
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 3.  Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review.

Authors:  J Victor
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.256

4.  An easy linear estimation of the mechanical axis on long-leg radiographs.

Authors:  C M Shearman; E A Brandser; M H Kathol; W A Clark; J J Callaghan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Bradley S Ellison; Jinjun Zhu; Erin L Ruh; Stephen M Howell; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA.

Authors:  Vincent Y Ng; Jeffrey H DeClaire; Keith R Berend; Bethany C Gulick; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  A comparison of conventional and patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kiriakos Daniilidis; Carsten O Tibesku
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Is TKA using patient-specific instruments comparable to conventional TKA? A randomized controlled study of one system.

Authors:  Yoon Whan Roh; Tae Woo Kim; Sahnghoon Lee; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A multi-planar CT-based comparative analysis of patient-specific cutting guides with conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kanniraj Marimuthu; Darren B Chen; Ian A Harris; Emma Wheatley; Carl J Bryant; Samuel J MacDessi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instruments improves function and restores limb alignment in patients with extra-articular deformity.

Authors:  Emmanuel Thienpont; Frederic Paternostre; Martin Pietsch; Mahmoud Hafez; Stephen Howell
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  18 in total

1.  How to explain the evaluation of the accuracy of patient-specific cutting blocks for total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Shuo Jie; Xiang-hong Zhang; Xiang-sheng Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Response to Jie et al.: How to explain the evaluation of the accuracy of patient-specific cutting blocks for total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Etienne Cavaignac; Regis Pailhé; Gregoire Laumond; Jérôme Murgier; Nicolas Reina; Jean Michel Laffosse; Emilie Bérard; Philippe Chiron
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The influence of osteophyte depiction in CT for patient-specific guided hip resurfacing procedures.

Authors:  M Kunz; S Balaketheeswaran; R E Ellis; J F Rudan
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Patient specific instrumentation versus conventional knee arthroplasty: comparative study.

Authors:  Vlad Predescu; Catalin Prescura; Razvan Olaru; Liliana Savin; Paul Botez; Bogdan Deleanu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with CT-based patient-specific instrumentation.

Authors:  Meng Zhu; Jerry Yongqiang Chen; Hwei Chi Chong; Andy Khye Soon Yew; Leon Siang Shen Foo; Shi-Lu Chia; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Significant differences between manufacturer and surgeon in the accuracy of final component size prediction with CT-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Davide Cucchi; Alessandra Menon; Riccardo Compagnoni; Paolo Ferrua; Chiara Fossati; Pietro Randelli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  A double-blind randomized controlled trial of total knee replacement using patient-specific cutting block instrumentation versus standard instrumentation

Authors:  Thomas R. Turgeon; Brett Cameron; Colin D. Burnell; David R. Hedden; Eric R. Bohm
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 8.  Patient-specific instrumentation does not improve radiographic alignment or clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Henricus J T A M Huijbregts; Riaz J K Khan; Emma Sorensen; Daniel P Fick; Samantha Haebich
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Computed Tomography Analysis of Postsurgery Femoral Component Rotation Based on a Force Sensing Device Method versus Hypothetical Rotational Alignment Based on Anatomical Landmark Methods: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Stefan W Kreuzer; Amir Pourmoghaddam; Kevin J Leffers; Clint W Johnson; Marius Dettmer
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2016-01-04

10.  3D-Printed Patient-Specific ACL Femoral Tunnel Guide from MRI.

Authors:  Iain Rankin; Haroon Rehman; Mark Frame
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2018-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.