Literature DB >> 16672905

Two-year outcomes of computed tomography-based and computed tomography free navigation for total knee arthroplasties.

Arno Martin1, A von Strempel.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Optimal component position in all planes and well-balanced soft tissues facilitate a good clinical outcome and long-term survival after total knee arthroplasties. We investigated the accuracy of implantation of navigated total knee arthroplasties at 3 months followup and the influence on the clinical outcome at 2 years followup. Forty-four patients (44 procedures) were enrolled in our prospective study. One half of the surgeries were performed using a computed tomography-based navigation system, and half were performed with imageless navigation. Outcomes were based on the Insall knee score parameters, anterior knee pain, patient satisfaction, feeling of instability, and step test. The radiographic parameters were the mechanical axis, tibial slope, lateral distal femoral angle, and medial proximal tibial angle. The radiographic measurements were similar in both groups (patients within +/- 3 degrees inaccuracy range in computed tomography-based/imageless groups; mechanical axis 86%/81%, tibial slope 95%/91%, lateral distal femoral angle 95%/91%, medial proximal tibial angle 91%/95%). The imageless system provided equal radiographic results, but we found improved ligament balancing in the computed tomography free group. The computed tomography-based approach has a good pre-operative planning procedure, but is more expensive and time consuming. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Study, Level II. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16672905     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218738.69247.d8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  14 in total

1.  The limits of precision in conventionally instrumented computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R E da Assunção; N J Hancock; W J M Bruce; P Walker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Computer navigation did not improve alignment in a lower-volume total knee practice.

Authors:  W P Yau; K Y Chiu; J L Zuo; W M Tang; T P Ng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at midterm follow-up?

Authors:  Yogeesh D Kamat; Kamran M Aurakzai; Ajeya R Adhikari; Daniel Matthews; Yegappan Kalairajah; Richard E Field
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Accuracy of side-cutting implantation instruments for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Arno Martin; Mitchell B Sheinkop; Mary M Langhenry; Christian Oelsch; Mark Widemschek; Archibald von Strempel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Two year follow-up comparing computer assisted versus freehand TKR on joint stability, muscular function and patients satisfaction.

Authors:  C Lüring; F Oczipka; L Perlick; M Tingart; J Grifka; H Bäthis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation, computer-assisted surgery, and manual instrumentation: a short-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Mark Yaffe; Michael Luo; Nitin Goyal; Philip Chan; Anay Patel; Max Cayo; S David Stulberg
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Computer navigation-assisted versus minimally invasive TKA: benefits and drawbacks.

Authors:  Peter M Bonutti; Daniel Dethmers; Slif D Ulrich; Thorsten M Seyler; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Comparison of two minimally invasive implantation instrument-sets for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Arno Martin; Mitchell B Sheinkop; Mary M Langhenry; Mark Widemschek; Thomas Benesch; Archibald von Strempel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  A five to seven year follow-up comparing computer-assisted vs freehand TKR with regard to clinical parameters.

Authors:  C Lüring; M Kauper; H Bäthis; L Perlick; J Beckmann; J Grifka; M Tingart; B Rath
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Computer assisted versus conventional cemented total knee prostheses alignment accuracy and micromotion of the tibial component.

Authors:  Thisbe van Strien; Enrike van der Linden-van der Zwaag; Bart Kaptein; Arjan van Erkel; Edward Valstar; Rob Nelissen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.