Literature DB >> 27162776

Patient specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a state of the art.

Lorenzo Mattei1, Pietro Pellegrino1, Michel Calò1, Alessandro Bistolfi1, Filippo Castoldi1.   

Abstract

Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) is a modern technique in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aiming to facilitate the implant of the prosthesis. The customized cutting blocks of the PSI are generated from pre-operative three-dimensional model, using computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A correct surgical plan is mandatory for a good surgical implant. The PSI guide takes into account any slight deformities or osteophytes and applies preoperative planning for bone resection, using the pre-determined implant size, position, and rotation. The apparent benefits of this technology are that neutral postoperative alignment is more reproducible, surgical time is decreased, and the entire procedure results more efficient and cost-effective. The use of PSI is indicated when advanced osteoarthritis, severe pain, and limited function/walking ability are present, such as in a standard instrumentation TKA. In addition to that, PSI finds its indication when intra-medullary guides cannot be used. For example, when there is a post-traumatic femoral deformity. Large debates have taken place about this topic during the last years and, at the moment, there is no consensus in literature regarding the accuracy and reliability of PSI as many studies have shown controversial and inconsistent results. Literature does not suggest PSI techniques as a gold standard in TKA, and therefore it cannot be recommended as a standard technique in standard, not complicated primary TKA. Moreover, literature does not underline any improvement in components alignment, surgical time, blood loss or functional outcomes. Nevertheless, many patients who underwent TKA suffered a previous trauma. In case of deformities, like femoral or tibial fractures healed with a malalignment, preoperative planning may result difficult, and some intra-operative technical difficulties can occur, such as the use of intra-medullar rod. In these selected cases, PSIs may be very useful to avoid errors in alignment and planning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient; instrumentation; specific; total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

Year:  2016        PMID: 27162776      PMCID: PMC4842392          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2016.03.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


  30 in total

1.  Blood loss following total knee replacement is reduced when using computer-assisted versus standard methods.

Authors:  Jamie McConnell; John Dillon; Andrew Kinninmonth; Martin Sarungi; Frederic Picard
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 0.500

2.  In-vivo alignment comparing patient specific instrumentation with both conventional and computer assisted surgery (CAS) instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  William Barrett; Daniel Hoeffel; David Dalury; J Bohannon Mason; Jeff Murphy; Sam Himden
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Less invasive TKA: extramedullary femoral reference without navigation.

Authors:  Andrea Baldini; Paolo Adravanti
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement.

Authors:  R S Jeffery; R W Morris; R A Denham
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-09

5.  Clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation, computer-assisted surgery, and manual instrumentation: a short-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Mark Yaffe; Michael Luo; Nitin Goyal; Philip Chan; Anay Patel; Max Cayo; S David Stulberg
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations.

Authors:  J H Bargren; J D Blaha; M A Freeman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement: a comparison of tourniquet time, blood loss and length of stay.

Authors:  Sanil H Ajwani; Morgan Jones; Jeremy W Jarratt; Gordon J Shepard; William G Ryan
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Is TKA using patient-specific instruments comparable to conventional TKA? A randomized controlled study of one system.

Authors:  Yoon Whan Roh; Tae Woo Kim; Sahnghoon Lee; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The John Insall Award: No Functional Benefit After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Performed With Patient-specific Instrumentation: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Matthieu Ollivier; Sebastien Parratte; Alexandre Lunebourg; Elke Viehweger; Jean-Noel Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Rotation in total knee arthroplasty: no difference between patient-specific and conventional instrumentation.

Authors:  Sébastien Parratte; Guillaume Blanc; Thomas Boussemart; Matthieu Ollivier; Thomas Le Corroller; Jean-Noël Argenson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  13 in total

1.  Ultrasound imaging and segmentation of bone surfaces: A review.

Authors:  Ilker Hacihaliloglu
Journal:  Technology (Singap World Sci)       Date:  2017-03-31

2.  Custom-made hinged total knee arthroplasties in the context of extra-articular deformity: a case series.

Authors:  Timo K Nuutinen; R Madanat; K W Både; L H Ristolainen; H Kauppinen; M J Manninen
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-06-14

Review 3.  3D printing applications in spine surgery: an evidence-based assessment toward personalized patient care.

Authors:  Ahmed Habib; Nicolina Jovanovich; Nallammai Muthiah; Ali Alattar; Nima Alan; Nitin Agarwal; Alp Ozpinar; David Kojo Hamilton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 2.721

4.  CT-Based 3D Reconstruction of Lower Limb Versus X-Ray-Based 3D Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis and Application for a Safe and Cost-Effective Modality in TKA.

Authors:  Vivek Shetty; Yash Wagh; Vikas Karade; Amit Maurya; Mangal Parihar; Sajeev Shekhar; Jignesh Tandel
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 1.033

5.  Knee arthroplasty with hardware removal: complication cascade. Is it preventable?

Authors:  Gabriel Nierenberg; Alaa Abu Elasal; Eran Keltz; Doron Norman
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-08-24

6.  Clinical Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed Using Patient-Specific Cutting Guides.

Authors:  Murat Çalbıyık
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-12-29

7.  Kinematic alignment technique for total hip and knee arthroplasty: The personalized implant positioning surgery.

Authors:  Charles Rivière; Stefan Lazic; Loïc Villet; Yann Wiart; Sarah Muirhead Allwood; Justin Cobb
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-03-29

Review 8.  Patient-Specific or Conventional Instrumentations: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Yipeng Lin; Wufeng Cai; Baoyun Xu; Jian Li; Yuan Yang; Xuelin Pan; Weili Fu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Are There Differences in Accuracy or Outcomes Scores Among Navigated, Robotic, Patient-specific Instruments or Standard Cutting Guides in TKA? A Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pierre-Alban Bouché; Simon Corsia; Agnès Dechartres; Matthieu Resche-Rigon; Rémy Nizard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  Patient-Specific Instruments Based on Knee Joint Computed Tomography and Full-Length Lower Extremity Radiography in Total Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Hua Tian; Min-Wei Zhao; Xiao Geng; Qi-Yun Zhou; Yang Li
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.