Literature DB >> 24272457

Influence of difference in cross-sectional dose profile in a CTDI phantom on X-ray CT dose estimation: a Monte Carlo study.

Tomonobu Haba1, Shuji Koyama, Yoshihiro Ida.   

Abstract

The longitudinal dose profile in a computed tomography dose index (CTDI) phantom had been studied by many researchers. The cross-sectional dose profile in the CTDI phantom, however, has not been studied. It is also important to understand the cross-sectional dose profile in the CTDI phantom for dose estimation in X-ray CT. In this study, the cross-sectional dose profile in the CTDI phantom was calculated by use of a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation method. A helical or a 320-detector-row cone-beam X-ray CT scanner was simulated. The cross-sectional dose profile in the CTDI phantom from surface to surface through the center point was calculated by MC simulation. The shape of the calculation region was a cylinder of 1-mm-diameter. The length of the cylinder was 23, 100, or 300 mm to represent various CT ionization chamber lengths. Detailed analyses of the energy depositions demonstrated that the cross-sectional dose profile was different in measurement methods and phantom sizes. In this study, we also focused on the validation of the weighting factor used in weighted CTDI (CTDI w ). As it stands now, the weighting factor used in CTDI w is (1/3, 2/3) for the (central, peripheral) axes. Our results showed that an equal weighting factor, which is (1/2, 1/2) for the (central, peripheral) axes, is more suitable to estimate the average cross-sectional dose when X-ray CT dose estimation is performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24272457     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-013-0242-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  17 in total

1.  A new look at CT dose measurement: beyond CTDI.

Authors:  Robert L Dixon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Semiempirical model for generating tungsten target x-ray spectra.

Authors:  D M Tucker; G T Barnes; D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Is it time to retire the CTDI for CT quality assurance and dose optimization?

Authors:  David J Brenner
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Variability of surface and center position radiation dose in MDCT: Monte Carlo simulations using CTDI and anthropomorphic phantoms.

Authors:  Di Zhang; Ali S Savandi; John J Demarco; Chris H Cagnon; Erin Angel; Adam C Turner; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Andrew N Primak; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Investigation of lung nodule detectability in low-dose 320-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  J D Silverman; N S Paul; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  An assessment of GafChromic film for measuring 50 kV and 100 kV percentage depth dose curves.

Authors:  Claire Lesley Fletcher; John A Mills
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  T B Shope; R M Gagne; G C Johnson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners.

Authors:  K Perisinakis; J Damilakis; A Tzedakis; A Papadakis; N Theocharopoulos; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Scan time and patient dose for thoracic imaging in neonates and small children using axial volumetric 320-detector row CT compared to helical 64-, 32-, and 16- detector row CT acquisitions.

Authors:  Lucia J M Kroft; Joost J H Roelofs; Jacob Geleijns
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-12-08

10.  Computed tomography dose assessment for a 160 mm wide, 320 detector row, cone beam CT scanner.

Authors:  J Geleijns; M Salvadó Artells; P W de Bruin; R Matter; Y Muramatsu; M F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  2 in total

1.  Investigation of Eye Lens Dose Estimate based on AAPM Report 293 in Head Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Choirul Anam; Winda Kusuma Dewi; Masdi Masdi; Freddy Haryanto; Toshioh Fujibuchi; Geoff Dougherty
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2021-10-01

2.  Comparison of central, peripheral, and weighted size-specific dose in CT.

Authors:  Choirul Anam; Dwi Adhianto; Heri Sutanto; Kusworo Adi; Mohd Hanafi Ali; William Ian Duncombe Rae; Toshioh Fujibuchi; Geoff Dougherty
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 1.535

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.