Literature DB >> 16279076

Is it time to retire the CTDI for CT quality assurance and dose optimization?

David J Brenner.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2005        PMID： 16279076     DOI： 10.1118/1.2040747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN： 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Influence of difference in cross-sectional dose profile in a CTDI phantom on X-ray CT dose estimation: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Tomonobu Haba; Shuji Koyama; Yoshihiro Ida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-11-24

2.  Dosimetric evaluation of a 320 detector row CT scanner unit.

Authors:  Mario de Denaro; Paola Bregant
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 3.  Conventional and CT angiography in children: dosimetry and dose comparisons.

Authors:  Donald P Frush; Terry Yoshizumi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09

4.  Absorbed dose and dose rate using the Varian OBI 1.3 and 1.4 CBCT system.

Authors:  Asa Palm; Elisabeth Nilsson; Lars Herrnsdorf
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Experimental validation of a kV source model and dose computation method for CBCT imaging in an anthropomorphic phantom.

Authors:  Yannick Poirier; Mauro Tambasco
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.