Literature DB >> 12852553

A new look at CT dose measurement: beyond CTDI.

Robert L Dixon1.   

Abstract

Equations are derived for generating accumulated dose distributions and the dose line integral in a cylindrical dosimetry phantom for a helical CT scan series from the single slice dose profiles using convolution methods. This exposition will better clarify the nature of the dose distribution in helical CT, as well as providing the medical physicist with a better understanding of the physics involved in dose delivery and the measurement process. Also addressed is the concern that as radiation beam widths for multi-slice scanners get wider, the current methodology based on the measurement of the integral of the single slice profile using a 10 cm long ion chamber (CTDI100) may no longer be adequate. It is shown that this measurement would underestimate the equilibrium dose and dose line integral by about 20% in the center of the body phantom, and by about 10% in the center of the head phantom for a 20 mm nominal beam width in a multi-slice scanner. Rather than making the ion chamber even longer to collect the broad scatter tails of the single slice profile, an alternative to the CTDI method is suggested which involves using a small volume ion chamber, and scanning a length of phantom long enough to establish dose equilibrium at the location of the chamber. With a modern CT scanner, such a scan length can be covered in 15 s or less with a helical or axial series, so this method is not significantly more time-consuming than the long chamber method. The method is demonstrated experimentally herein.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12852553     DOI: 10.1118/1.1576952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  44 in total

1.  Dose distribution for dental cone beam CT and its implication for defining a dose index.

Authors:  R Pauwels; C Theodorakou; A Walker; H Bosmans; R Jacobs; K Horner; R Bogaerts
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Cone beam CT dosimetry: a unified and self-consistent approach including all scan modalities--with or without phantom motion.

Authors:  Robert L Dixon; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners.

Authors:  Adam C Turner; Maria Zankl; John J DeMarco; Chris H Cagnon; Di Zhang; Erin Angel; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Xin Liu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Mingliang Qu; Jodie Christner; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2009-10

5.  Practical dose point-based methods to characterize dose distribution in a stationary elliptical body phantom for a cone-beam C-arm CT system.

Authors:  Jang-Hwan Choi; Dragos Constantin; Arundhuti Ganguly; Erin Girard; Richard L Morin; Robert L Dixon; Rebecca Fahrig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Dosimetric assessment of the exposure of radiotherapy patients due to cone-beam CT procedures.

Authors:  Mariana Baptista; Salvatore Di Maria; Sandra Vieira; Joana Santos; Joana Pereira; Miguel Pereira; Pedro Vaz
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Absorbed radiation dose in radiosensitive organs during coronary CT angiography using 320-MDCT: effect of maximum tube voltage and heart rate variations.

Authors:  Boris Nikolic; Faisal Khosa; Pei-Jan Paul Lin; Atif N Khan; Sheryar Sarwar; Chun-Shan Yam; Laurence E Court; Vassilios Raptopoulos; Melvin E Clouse
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT).

Authors:  Willi A Kalender; Yiannis Kyriakou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Variability of surface and center position radiation dose in MDCT: Monte Carlo simulations using CTDI and anthropomorphic phantoms.

Authors:  Di Zhang; Ali S Savandi; John J Demarco; Chris H Cagnon; Erin Angel; Adam C Turner; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Andrew N Primak; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Influence of difference in cross-sectional dose profile in a CTDI phantom on X-ray CT dose estimation: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Tomonobu Haba; Shuji Koyama; Yoshihiro Ida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-11-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.