Literature DB >> 19378763

Variability of surface and center position radiation dose in MDCT: Monte Carlo simulations using CTDI and anthropomorphic phantoms.

Di Zhang1, Ali S Savandi, John J Demarco, Chris H Cagnon, Erin Angel, Adam C Turner, Dianna D Cody, Donna M Stevens, Andrew N Primak, Cynthia H McCollough, Michael F McNitt-Gray.   

Abstract

The larger coverage afforded by wider z-axis beams in multidetector CT (MDCT) creates larger cone angles and greater beam divergence, which results in substantial surface dose variation for helical and contiguous axial scans. This study evaluates the variation of absorbed radiation dose in both cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms when performing helical or contiguous axial scans. The approach used here was to perform Monte Carlo simulations of a 64 slice MDCT. Simulations were performed with different radiation profiles (simulated beam widths) for a given collimation setting (nominal beam width) and for different pitch values and tube start angles. The magnitude of variation at the surface was evaluated under four different conditions: (a) a homogeneous CTDI phantom with different combinations of pitch and simulated beam widths, (b) a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom with one measured beam collimation and various pitch values, (c) a homogeneous CTDI phantom with fixed beam collimation and pitch, but with different tube start angles, and (d) pitch values that should minimize variations of surface dose-evaluated for both homogeneous and heterogeneous phantoms. For the CTDI phantom simulations, peripheral dose patterns showed variation with percent ripple as high as 65% when pitch is 1.5 and simulated beam width is equal to the nominal collimation. For the anterior surface dose on an anthropomorphic phantom, the percent ripple was as high as 40% when the pitch is 1.5 and simulated beam width is equal to the measured beam width. Low pitch values were shown to cause beam overlaps which created new peaks. Different x-ray tube start angles create shifts of the peripheral dose profiles. The start angle simulations showed that for a given table position, the surface dose could vary dramatically with minimum values that were 40% of the peak when all conditions are held constant except for the start angle. The last group of simulations showed that an "ideal" pitch value can be determined which reduces surface dose variations, but this pitch value must take into account the measured beam width. These results reveal the complexity of estimating surface dose and demonstrate a range of dose variability at surface positions for both homogeneous cylindrical and heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantoms. These findings have potential implications for small-sized dosimeter measurements in phantoms, such as with TLDs or small Farmer chambers.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19378763      PMCID: PMC2736750          DOI: 10.1118/1.3078053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  13 in total

Review 1.  AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT.

Authors:  Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  A new look at CT dose measurement: beyond CTDI.

Authors:  Robert L Dixon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Radiation dose to the female breast from 16-MDCT body protocols.

Authors:  Lynne M Hurwitz; Terry T Yoshizumi; Robert E Reiman; Erik K Paulson; Donald P Frush; Giao T Nguyen; Greta I Toncheva; Philip C Goodman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Early first-trimester fetal radiation dose estimation in 16-MDCT without and with automated tube current modulation.

Authors:  Tracy A Jaffe; Terry T Yoshizumi; Greta I Toncheva; Giao Nguyen; Lynne M Hurwitz; Rendon C Nelson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  A Monte Carlo-based method to estimate radiation dose from spiral CT: from phantom testing to patient-specific models.

Authors:  G Jarry; J J DeMarco; U Beifuss; C H Cagnon; M F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-08-21       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  A CT-based Monte Carlo simulation tool for dosimetry planning and analysis.

Authors:  J J DeMarco; T D Solberg; J B Smathers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  T B Shope; R M Gagne; G C Johnson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  The GSF family of voxel phantoms.

Authors:  Nina Petoussi-Henss; Maria Zanki; Ute Fill; Dieter Regulla
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Radiation dose to the fetus from body MDCT during early gestation.

Authors:  Lynne M Hurwitz; Terry Yoshizumi; Robert E Reiman; Philip C Goodman; Erik K Paulson; Donald P Frush; Greta Toncheva; Giao Nguyen; Lottie Barnes
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Estimating radiation doses from multidetector CT using Monte Carlo simulations: effects of different size voxelized patient models on magnitudes of organ and effective dose.

Authors:  J J DeMarco; C H Cagnon; D D Cody; D M Stevens; C H McCollough; M Zankl; E Angel; M F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  13 in total

1.  The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners.

Authors:  Adam C Turner; Maria Zankl; John J DeMarco; Chris H Cagnon; Di Zhang; Erin Angel; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Experimental estimates of peak skin dose and its relationship to the CT dose index using the CTDI head phantom.

Authors:  Hugo de las Heras; Ronaldo Minniti; Sean Wilson; Chad Mitchell; Marlene Skopec; Claudia C Brunner; Kish Chakrabarti
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Influence of difference in cross-sectional dose profile in a CTDI phantom on X-ray CT dose estimation: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Tomonobu Haba; Shuji Koyama; Yoshihiro Ida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-11-24

4.  Comparison of radiation dose estimates, image noise, and scan duration in pediatric body imaging for volumetric and helical modes on 320-detector CT and helical mode on 64-detector CT.

Authors:  Jennifer H Johnston; Daniel J Podberesky; Terry T Yoshizumi; Erin Angel; Greta Toncheva; David B Larson; John C Egelhoff; Colin Anderson-Evans; Giao B Nguyen; Alessandra Barelli; Christopher Alsip; Shelia R Salisbury; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-05-01

5.  Estimating fetal dose from tube current-modulated (TCM) and fixed tube current (FTC) abdominal/pelvis CT examinations.

Authors:  Anthony J Hardy; Erin Angel; Maryam Bostani; Chris Cagnon; Michael McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  In vitro dose measurements in a human cadaver with abdomen/pelvis CT scans.

Authors:  Da Zhang; Atul Padole; Xinhua Li; Sarabjeet Singh; Ranish Deedar Ali Khawaja; Diego Lira; Tianyu Liu; Jim Q Shi; Alexi Otrakji; Mannudeep K Kalra; X George Xu; Bob Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Sample size requirements for estimating effective dose from computed tomography using solid-state metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor dosimetry.

Authors:  Sigal Trattner; Bin Cheng; Radoslaw L Pieniazek; Udo Hoffmann; Pamela S Douglas; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Direct and fast measurement of CT beam filter profiles with simultaneous geometrical calibration.

Authors:  Kai Yang; Xinhua Li; X George Xu; Bob Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Organ localization: toward prospective patient-specific organ dosimetry in computed tomography.

Authors:  W P Segars; K Rybicki; Hannah Norris; D Frush; E Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Reducing radiation dose to selected organs by selecting the tube start angle in MDCT helical scans: a Monte Carlo based study.

Authors:  Di Zhang; Maria Zankl; John J DeMarco; Chris H Cagnon; Erin Angel; Adam C Turner; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.