Literature DB >> 17951857

Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners.

K Perisinakis1, J Damilakis, A Tzedakis, A Papadakis, N Theocharopoulos, N Gourtsoyiannis.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to (a) evaluate the underestimation in the value of the free-in-air (CTDI(air)) and the weighted CT dose index (CTDI(w)) determined with the standard 100 mm pencil chamber, i.e. the CTDI(100) concept, for the whole range of nominal radiation beam collimations selectable in a modern multi-slice CT scanner, (b) estimate the optimum length of the pencil-chamber and phantoms for accurate CTDI(w) measurements and (c) provide CTDI(w) values normalized to free-in-air CTDI for different tube-voltage, nominal radiation beam collimations and beam filtration values. The underestimation in the determination of CTDI(air) and CTDI(w) using the CTDI(100) concept was determined from measurements obtained with standard polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) phantoms and arrays of thermoluminescence dosimeters. The Monte Carlo N-Particle transport code was used to simulate standard CTDI measurements on a 16-slice CT scanner. The optimum pencil-chamber length for accurate determination of CTDI(w) was estimated as the minimum chamber length for which a further increase in length does not alter the value of the CTDI. CTDI(w)/CTDI(air) ratios were determined using Monte Carlo simulation and the optimum detector length for all selectable tube-voltage values and for three different values of beam filtration. To verify the Monte Carlo results, measured values of CTDI(w)/CTDI(air) ratios using the standard 100 mm pencil ionization chamber were compared with corresponding values calculated with Monte Carlo experiments. The underestimation in the determination of CTDI(air) using the 100 mm pencil chamber was less than 1% for all beam collimations. The underestimation in CTDI(w) was 15% and 27% for head and body phantoms, respectively. The optimum detector length for accurate CTDI(w) measurements was found to be 50 cm for the beam collimations commonly employed in modern multi-detector (MD) CT scanners. The ratio of CTDI(w)/CTDI(air) determined using the optimum detector length was found to be independent of beam collimation. Percentage differences between measured and calculated corresponding CTDI(w)/CTDI(air) ratios were always less than 8% for head and less than 5% for body PMMA phantoms. In conclusion, the CTDI(air) of MDCT scanners may be measured accurately with a 100 mm pencil chamber. However, the CTDI(100) concept was found to be inadequate for accurate CTDI(w) determination for the wide beam collimations commonly used in MDCT scanners. Accurate CTDI(w) determination presupposes the use of a pencil chamber and PMMA phantoms at least 50 cm long.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17951857     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/21/010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Dose distribution for dental cone beam CT and its implication for defining a dose index.

Authors:  R Pauwels; C Theodorakou; A Walker; H Bosmans; R Jacobs; K Horner; R Bogaerts
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Xin Liu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Mingliang Qu; Jodie Christner; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2009-10

3.  Influence of difference in cross-sectional dose profile in a CTDI phantom on X-ray CT dose estimation: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Tomonobu Haba; Shuji Koyama; Yoshihiro Ida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-11-24

4.  Assessment of volumetric absorbed dose for mobile fluoroscopic 3D image acquisition.

Authors:  Stephanie Leon
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Evaluation of cumulative dose for cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans within phantoms made from different compositions using Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Abdullah Abuhaimed; Colin J Martin; Marimuthu Sankaralingam; Kurian Oomen; David J Gentle
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Computed Dosimeter Dose Index on a 16-Slice Computed Tomography Scanner.

Authors:  Tadelech S Mekonin; Tilahun T Deressu
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 2.623

7.  Assessment of task-based image quality for abdominal CT protocols linked with national diagnostic reference levels.

Authors:  Anaïs Viry; Christoph Aberle; Thiago Lima; Reto Treier; Sebastian T Schindera; Francis R Verdun; Damien Racine
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.