Literature DB >> 19420423

Computed tomography dose assessment for a 160 mm wide, 320 detector row, cone beam CT scanner.

J Geleijns1, M Salvadó Artells, P W de Bruin, R Matter, Y Muramatsu, M F McNitt-Gray.   

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) dosimetry should be adapted to the rapid developments in CT technology. Recently a 160 mm wide, 320 detector row, cone beam CT scanner that challenges the existing Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI) dosimetry paradigm was introduced. The purpose of this study was to assess dosimetric characteristics of this cone beam scanner, to study the appropriateness of existing CT dose metrics and to suggest a pragmatic approach for CT dosimetry for cone beam scanners. Dose measurements with a small Farmer-type ionization chamber and with 100 mm and 300 mm long pencil ionization chambers were performed free in air to characterize the cone beam. According to the most common dose metric in CT, namely CTDI, measurements were also performed in 150 mm and 350 mm long CT head and CT body dose phantoms with 100 mm and 300 mm long pencil ionization chambers, respectively. To explore effects that cannot be measured with ionization chambers, Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of the dose distribution in 150 mm, 350 mm and 700 mm long CT head and CT body phantoms were performed. To overcome inconsistencies in the definition of CTDI100 for the 160 mm wide cone beam CT scanner, doses were also expressed as the average absorbed dose within the pencil chamber (D100). Measurements free in air revealed excellent correspondence between CTDI300air and D100air, while CTDI100air substantially underestimates CTDI300air. Results of measurements in CT dose phantoms and corresponding MC simulations at centre and peripheral positions were weighted and revealed good agreement between CTDI300w, D100w and CTDI600w, while CTDI100w substantially underestimates CTDI300w. D100w provides a pragmatic metric for characterizing the dose of the 160 mm wide cone beam CT scanner. This quantity can be measured with the widely available 100 mm pencil ionization chamber within 150 mm long CT dose phantoms. CTDI300w measured in 350 mm long CT dose phantoms serves as an appropriate standard of reference for characterizing the dose of this CT scanner. A CT dose descriptor that is based on an integration length smaller than the actual beam width is preferably expressed as an (average) dose, such as D100 for the 160 mm wide cone beam CT scanner, and not as CTDI100.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19420423      PMCID: PMC2948862          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/10/012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  15 in total

Review 1.  AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT.

Authors:  Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  The calibration of experimental self-developing Gafchromic HXR film for the measurement of radiation dose in computed tomography.

Authors:  K R Gorny; S L Leitzen; M R Bruesewitz; J M Kofler; N J Hangiandreou; C H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Validation of a Monte Carlo tool for patient-specific dose simulations in multi-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  Paul Deak; Marcel van Straten; Paul C Shrimpton; Maria Zankl; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Experimental validation of a versatile system of CT dosimetry using a conventional ion chamber: beyond CTDI100.

Authors:  Robert L Dixon; Adam C Ballard
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Three-vessel coronary artery disease examined with 320-slice computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Marc Dewey; Elke Zimmermann; Michael Laule; Wolfgang Rutsch; Bernd Hamm
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 6.  CT dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices.

Authors:  John A Bauhs; Thomas J Vrieze; Andrew N Primak; Michael R Bruesewitz; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Kent M Ogden; Mohammad R Khorasani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Enlarged longitudinal dose profiles in cone-beam CT and the need for modified dosimetry.

Authors:  Shinichiro Mori; Masahiro Endo; Kanae Nishizawa; Takanori Tsunoo; Takahiko Aoyama; Hideaki Fujiwara; Kenya Murase
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Patient dose in cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.443

10.  Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography.

Authors:  Frank J Rybicki; Hansel J Otero; Michael L Steigner; Gabriel Vorobiof; Leelakrishna Nallamshetty; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Hale Ersoy; Richard T Mather; Philip F Judy; Tianxi Cai; Karl Coyner; Kurt Schultz; Amanda G Whitmore; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 2.357

View more
  19 in total

1.  Influence of difference in cross-sectional dose profile in a CTDI phantom on X-ray CT dose estimation: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Tomonobu Haba; Shuji Koyama; Yoshihiro Ida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-11-24

2.  Quantification of radiation dose reduction by reducing z-axis coverage in 320-detector coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  David J Murphy; Abhishek Keraliya; Nathan Himes; Ayaz Aghayev; Ron Blankstein; Michael L Steigner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Dose exposure of patients undergoing comprehensive stroke imaging by multidetector-row CT: comparison of 320-detector row and 64-detector row CT scanners.

Authors:  S Diekmann; E Siebert; R Juran; M Roll; W Deeg; H-C Bauknecht; F Diekmann; R Klingebiel; G Bohner
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  4D digital subtraction angiography: implementation and demonstration of feasibility.

Authors:  B Davis; K Royalty; M Kowarschik; C Rohkohl; E Oberstar; B Aagaard-Kienitz; D Niemann; O Ozkan; C Strother; C Mistretta
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  CT angiography: current technology and clinical use.

Authors:  Kanako K Kumamaru; Bernice E Hoppel; Richard T Mather; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Scan time and patient dose for thoracic imaging in neonates and small children using axial volumetric 320-detector row CT compared to helical 64-, 32-, and 16- detector row CT acquisitions.

Authors:  Lucia J M Kroft; Joost J H Roelofs; Jacob Geleijns
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-12-08

7.  Use of cardiac CT angiography imaging in an epidemiology study - the Methodology of the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study cardiovascular disease substudy.

Authors:  Yalçın Hacıoğlu; Mohit Gupta; Tae Young Choi; Richard T George; Christopher R Deible; Lisa P Jacobson; Mallory D Witt; Frank J Palella; Wendy S Post; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Anadolu Kardiyol Derg       Date:  2013-01-30

8.  Effective dose to patient measurements in flat-detector and multislice computed tomography: a comparison of applications in neuroradiology.

Authors:  Tobias Struffert; Michael Hauer; Rosemarie Banckwitz; Christoph Köhler; Kevin Royalty; Arnd Doerfler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Dosimetric evaluation of a 320 detector row CT scanner unit.

Authors:  Mario de Denaro; Paola Bregant
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Measurement of skin dose from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.

Authors:  Sercan Akyalcin; Jeryl D English; Kenneth M Abramovitch; Xiujiang J Rong
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.151

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.