Literature DB >> 23343891

Responses to pulsatile subretinal electric stimulation: effects of amplitude and duration.

Seung Woo Lee1, Donald K Eddington, Shelley I Fried.   

Abstract

In working to improve the quality of visual percepts elicited by retinal prosthetics, considerable effort has been made to understand how retinal neurons respond to electric stimulation. Whereas responses arising from direct activation of retinal ganglion cells have been well studied, responses arising through indirect activation (e.g., secondary to activation of bipolar cells) are not as well understood. Here, we used cell-attached, patch-clamp recordings to measure the responses of rabbit ganglion cells in vitro to a wide range of stimulus-pulse parameters (amplitudes: 0-100 μA; durations: 0.1-50 ms), applied to a 400-μm-diameter, subretinal-stimulating electrode. The indirect responses generally consisted of multiple action potentials that were clustered into bursts, although the latency and number of spikes within a burst were highly variable. When different parameter pairs representing identical charge levels were compared, the shortest pulse durations generally elicited the most spikes. In addition, latencies were shortest, and jitter was lowest for short pulses. These findings suggest that short pulses are optimum for activation of presynaptic neurons, and therefore, short pulses are more effective for both direct as well as indirect activation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23343891      PMCID: PMC3628003          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00293.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  44 in total

1.  Electrical multisite stimulation of the isolated chicken retina.

Authors:  A Stett; W Barth; S Weiss; H Haemmerle; E Zrenner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The diversity of ganglion cells in a mammalian retina.

Authors:  Rebecca L Rockhill; Frank J Daly; Margaret A MacNeil; Solange P Brown; Richard H Masland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Intrinsic physiological properties of cat retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Brendan J O'Brien; Tomoki Isayama; Randal Richardson; David M Berson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  T-type Ca(2+) channels mediate neurotransmitter release in retinal bipolar cells.

Authors:  Z H Pan; H J Hu; P Perring; R Andrade
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-10-11       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation.

Authors:  D B McCreery; W F Agnew; T G Yuen; L Bullara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Differential expression of high- and two types of low-voltage-activated calcium currents in rod and cone bipolar cells of the rat retina.

Authors:  Z H Pan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes: II-estimation of maximum surface redox (theoretical non-gassing) limits.

Authors:  S B Brummer; M J Turner
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with an ultrafine, extracellular microelectrode.

Authors:  Ralph J Jensen; Joseph F Rizzo; Ofer R Ziv; Andrew Grumet; John Wyatt
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Effects of high-level pulse train stimulation on retinal function.

Authors:  Ethan D Cohen
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials.

Authors:  Joseph F Rizzo; John Wyatt; John Loewenstein; Shawn Kelly; Doug Shire
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  17 in total

1.  Temporal properties of network-mediated responses to repetitive stimuli are dependent upon retinal ganglion cell type.

Authors:  Maesoon Im; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Indirect activation elicits strong correlations between light and electrical responses in ON but not OFF retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Maesoon Im; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Differential effect of brief electrical stimulation on voltage-gated potassium channels.

Authors:  Morven A Cameron; Amr Al Abed; Yossi Buskila; Socrates Dokos; Nigel H Lovell; John W Morley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The Retinal Response to Sinusoidal Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Perry Twyford; Shelley Fried
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  The response of L5 pyramidal neurons of the PFC to magnetic stimulation from a micro-coil.

Authors:  Seung Woo Lee; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2014

6.  Retinal Degeneration Reduces Consistency of Network-Mediated Responses Arising in Ganglion Cells to Electric Stimulation.

Authors:  Young Jun Yoon; Jae-Ik Lee; Ye Ji Jang; Seungki An; Jae Hun Kim; Shelley I Fried; Maesoon Im
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 7.  Electronic approaches to restoration of sight.

Authors:  G A Goetz; D V Palanker
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2016-08-09

8.  Suppression of subthalamic nucleus activity by micromagnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Seung Woo Lee; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Improving the spatial resolution of epiretinal implants by increasing stimulus pulse duration.

Authors:  Andrew C Weitz; Devyani Nanduri; Matthew R Behrend; Alejandra Gonzalez-Calle; Robert J Greenberg; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 17.956

10.  Electric stimulus duration alters network-mediated responses depending on retinal ganglion cell type.

Authors:  Maesoon Im; Paul Werginz; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.