Literature DB >> 25571395

The response of L5 pyramidal neurons of the PFC to magnetic stimulation from a micro-coil.

Seung Woo Lee, Shelley I Fried.   

Abstract

Magnetic stimulation of the nervous system, e.g. transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), has been used both to unravel basic structure and function of the nervous system as well as to treat neurological diseases, i.e. clinical depression. Despite progress in both areas, ongoing advancements have been limited by a lack of understanding of the mechanism by which magnetic stimulation alters neural activity. Here, we report responses of cortical neurons to magnetic stimulation arising from a sub-millimeter coil. Cell attached patch clamp was used to record neural activity of layer 5/6 pyramidal neurons of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in the in vitro mouse brain slice preparation. The fields arising from the small coil were quite different from those arising during clinical TMS but nevertheless allowed the responses of cortical neurons to magnetic stimulation to be probed. For example, the focal nature of induced fields allowed the sensitivity of different regions within targeted pyramidal neurons, e.g. apical dendrite, soma and axon hillock, to be compared. We found that PFC pyramidal neurons were not sensitive to single pulses of stimulation regardless of coil location. However, regions of the apical dendrite and proximal axon were both sensitive to repetitive stimulation as long as the orientation of the induced electric field was aligned with the long axis of the neuron. These results suggest that neurons of the PFC are sensitive to weak magnetic fields and further, that this type of approach may be useful for unraveling some of the mechanisms underlying TMS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25571395      PMCID: PMC4465444          DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6945027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  13 in total

1.  Determining which mechanisms lead to activation in the motor cortex: a modeling study of transcranial magnetic stimulation using realistic stimulus waveforms and sulcal geometry.

Authors:  R Salvador; S Silva; P J Basser; P C Miranda
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  Is there a future for therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation?

Authors:  Michael C Ridding; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of small animals: a modeling study of the influence of coil geometry, size and orientation.

Authors:  R Salvador; P C Miranda
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

4.  Electrophysiological and morphological properties of layers V-VI principal pyramidal cells in rat prefrontal cortex in vitro.

Authors:  C R Yang; J K Seamans; N Gorelova
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex.

Authors:  A T Barker; R Jalinous; I L Freeston
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-05-11       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Magnetic coil stimulation of straight and bent amphibian and mammalian peripheral nerve in vitro: locus of excitation.

Authors:  P J Maccabee; V E Amassian; L P Eberle; R Q Cracco
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Role of cortical cell type and morphology in subthreshold and suprathreshold uniform electric field stimulation in vitro.

Authors:  Thomas Radman; Raddy L Ramos; Joshua C Brumberg; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) improves mood in depression.

Authors:  M S George; E M Wassermann; W A Williams; A Callahan; T A Ketter; P Basser; M Hallett; R M Post
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1995-10-02       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Slow integration leads to persistent action potential firing in distal axons of coupled interneurons.

Authors:  Mark E J Sheffield; Tyler K Best; Brett D Mensh; William L Kath; Nelson Spruston
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Sub-threshold spinal cord stimulation facilitates spontaneous motor activity in spinal rats.

Authors:  Parag Gad; Jaehoon Choe; Prithvi Shah; Guillermo Garcia-Alias; Mrinal Rath; Yury Gerasimenko; Hui Zhong; Roland R Roy; Victor Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  4 in total

1.  Micro-Coil Design Influences the Spatial Extent of Responses to Intracortical Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Krishnan Thyagarajan; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Immediate Effects of Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation on Single Cortical Pyramidal Neurons.

Authors:  Jineta Banerjee; Mary E Sorrell; Pablo A Celnik; Galit Pelled
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Implantable microcoils for intracortical magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Seung Woo Lee; Florian Fallegger; Bernard D F Casse; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Axonal blockage with microscopic magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Jordan Skach; Catherine Conway; Lauryn Barrett; Hui Ye
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.