Literature DB >> 12882804

Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with an ultrafine, extracellular microelectrode.

Ralph J Jensen1, Joseph F Rizzo, Ofer R Ziv, Andrew Grumet, John Wyatt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine electrical thresholds required for extracellular activation of retinal ganglion cells as part of a project to develop an epiretinal prosthesis.
METHODS: Retinal ganglion cells were recorded extracellularly in retinas isolated from adult New Zealand White rabbits. Electrical current pulses of 100- micro s duration were delivered to the inner surface of the retina from a 5- micro m long electrode. In about half of the cells, the point of lowest threshold was found by searching with anodal current pulses; in the other cells, cathodal current pulses were used.
RESULTS: Threshold measurements were obtained near the cell bodies of 20 ganglion cells and near the axons of 19 ganglion cells. Both cathodal and anodal stimuli evoked a neural response in the ganglion cells that consisted of a single action potential of near-constant latency that persisted when retinal synaptic transmission was blocked with cadmium chloride. For cell bodies, but not axons, thresholds for both cathodal and anodal stimulation were dependent on the search method used to find the point of lowest threshold. With search and stimulation of matching polarity, cathodal stimuli evoked a ganglion cell response at lower currents (approximately one seventh to one tenth axonal threshold) than did anodal stimuli for both cell bodies and axons. With cathodal search and stimulation, cell body median thresholds were somewhat lower (approximately one half) than the axonal median thresholds. With anodal search and stimulation, cell body median thresholds were approximately the same as axonal median thresholds.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that cathodal stimulation should produce lower thresholds, more localized stimulation, and somewhat better selectivity for cell bodies over axons than would anodal stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12882804     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-1041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  44 in total

1.  Resolution of the epiretinal prosthesis is not limited by electrode size.

Authors:  Matthew R Behrend; Ashish K Ahuja; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Selective activation of neuronal targets with sinusoidal electric stimulation.

Authors:  Daniel K Freeman; Donald K Eddington; Joseph F Rizzo; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Axonal sodium-channel bands shape the response to electric stimulation in retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Shelley I Fried; Aaron C W Lasker; Neal J Desai; Donald K Eddington; Joseph F Rizzo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  An in vitro model of a retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Ashish K Ahuja; Matthew R Behrend; Masako Kuroda; Mark S Humayun; James D Weiland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design.

Authors:  Chris Sekirnjak; Pawel Hottowy; Alexander Sher; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Factors affecting perceptual thresholds in epiretinal prostheses.

Authors:  Chloé de Balthasar; Sweta Patel; Arup Roy; Ricardo Freda; Scott Greenwald; Alan Horsager; Manjunatha Mahadevappa; Douglas Yanai; Matthew J McMahon; Mark S Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; James D Weiland; Ione Fine
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Response variability to high rates of electric stimulation in retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Changsi Cai; Qiushi Ren; Neal J Desai; Joseph F Rizzo; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Influence of the sodium channel band on retinal ganglion cell excitation during electric stimulation--a modeling study.

Authors:  P Werginz; S I Fried; F Rattay
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Focal electrical stimulation of major ganglion cell types in the primate retina for the design of visual prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren H Jepson; Pawel Hottowy; Keith Mathieson; Deborah E Gunning; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Electric stimulation with sinusoids and white noise for neural prostheses.

Authors:  Daniel K Freeman; Joseph F Rizzo; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.