Literature DB >> 26905231

Temporal properties of network-mediated responses to repetitive stimuli are dependent upon retinal ganglion cell type.

Maesoon Im1, Shelley I Fried.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide artificially-elicited vision that is temporally dynamic, retinal prosthetic devices will need to repeatedly stimulate retinal neurons. However, given the diversity of physiological types of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) as well as the heterogeneity of their responses to electric stimulation, temporal properties of RGC responses have not been adequately investigated. Here, we explored the cell type dependence of network-mediated RGC responses to repetitive electric stimulation at various stimulation rates. APPROACH: We examined responses of ON and OFF types of RGCs in the rabbit retinal explant to five consecutive stimuli with varying inter-stimulus intervals (10-1000 ms). Each stimulus was a 4 ms long monophasic sinusoidal cathodal current, which was applied epiretinally via a conical electrode. Spiking activity of targeted RGCs was recorded using a cell-attached patch electrode. MAIN
RESULTS: ON and OFF cells had distinct responses to repetitive stimuli. Consistent with earlier studies, OFF cells always generated reduced responses to subsequent stimuli compared to responses to the first stimulus. In contrast, a new stimulus to ON cells suppressed all pending/ongoing responses from previous stimuli and initiated its own response that was remarkably similar to the response from a single stimulus in isolation. This previously unreported 'reset' behavior was observed exclusively and consistently in ON cells. These contrasts between ON and OFF cells created a range of stimulation rates (4-7 Hz) that maximized the ratio of the responses arising in ON versus OFF cells. SIGNIFICANCE: Previous clinical testing reported that subjects perceive bright phosphenes (ON responses) and also prefer stimulation rates of 5-7 Hz. Our results suggest that responses of ON cells are weak at high rates of stimulation (> ∼7 Hz) due to the reset while responses of OFF cells are strong at low rates (< ∼4 Hz) due to reduced desensitization, both reducing the ratio of ON to OFF responses. In combination with previous results indicating that responses in ON cells more closely match physiological patterns (Im and Fried 2015 J. Physiol. 593 3577-96), our results offer a potential reason for the user preference of intermediate rates (5-7 Hz).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26905231      PMCID: PMC4931047          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/2/025002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  68 in total

Review 1.  Will retinal implants restore vision?

Authors:  Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Gap junctional coupling underlies the short-latency spike synchrony of retinal alpha ganglion cells.

Authors:  Edward H Hu; Stewart A Bloomfield
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Retinal organization in the retinal degeneration 10 (rd10) mutant mouse: a morphological and ERG study.

Authors:  Claudia Gargini; Eva Terzibasi; Francesca Mazzoni; Enrica Strettoi
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design.

Authors:  Chris Sekirnjak; Pawel Hottowy; Alexander Sher; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Morphologies of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with concentric receptive fields.

Authors:  F R Amthor; E S Takahashi; C W Oyster
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1989-02-01       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Spatial resolution and perception of patterns mediated by a subretinal 16-electrode array in patients blinded by hereditary retinal dystrophies.

Authors:  Robert Wilke; Veit-Peter Gabel; Helmut Sachs; Karl-Ulrich Bartz Schmidt; Florian Gekeler; Dorothea Besch; Peter Szurman; Alfred Stett; Barbara Wilhelm; Tobias Peters; Alex Harscher; Udo Greppmaier; Steffen Kibbel; Heval Benav; Anna Bruckmann; Katarina Stingl; Akos Kusnyerik; Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Rod photoreceptor neurite sprouting in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Z Y Li; I J Kljavin; A H Milam
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Effect of shape and coating of a subretinal prosthesis on its integration with the retina.

Authors:  A Butterwick; P Huie; B W Jones; R E Marc; M Marmor; D Palanker
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 3.467

9.  Activation of retinal ganglion cells in wild-type and rd1 mice through electrical stimulation of the retinal neural network.

Authors:  Ralph J Jensen; Joseph F Rizzo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Electrical stimulation of inner retinal neurons in wild-type and retinally degenerate (rd/rd) mice.

Authors:  Morven A Cameron; Gregg J Suaning; Nigel H Lovell; John W Morley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Subretinal electrical stimulation reveals intact network activity in the blind mouse retina.

Authors:  Henrike Stutzki; Florian Helmhold; Max Eickenscheidt; Günther Zeck
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Retinal Degeneration Reduces Consistency of Network-Mediated Responses Arising in Ganglion Cells to Electric Stimulation.

Authors:  Young Jun Yoon; Jae-Ik Lee; Ye Ji Jang; Seungki An; Jae Hun Kim; Shelley I Fried; Maesoon Im
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Electric stimulus duration alters network-mediated responses depending on retinal ganglion cell type.

Authors:  Maesoon Im; Paul Werginz; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Response of Mouse Visual Cortical Neurons to Electric Stimulation of the Retina.

Authors:  Sang Baek Ryu; Paul Werginz; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Probing and predicting ganglion cell responses to smooth electrical stimulation in healthy and blind mouse retina.

Authors:  Larissa Höfling; Jonathan Oesterle; Philipp Berens; Günther Zeck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Minimizing Iridium Oxide Electrodes for High Visual Acuity Subretinal Stimulation.

Authors:  Samir Damle; Maya Carleton; Theodoros Kapogianis; Shaurya Arya; Melina Cavichini-Corderio; William R Freeman; Yu-Hwa Lo; Nicholas W Oesch
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-12-23

7.  Spiking Characteristics of Network-Mediated Responses Arising in Direction-Selective Ganglion Cells of Rabbit and Mouse Retinas to Electric Stimulation for Retinal Prostheses.

Authors:  Yanjinsuren Otgondemberel; Hyeonhee Roh; Shelley I Fried; Maesoon Im
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Fabrication of High-Density Out-of-Plane Microneedle Arrays with Various Heights and Diverse Cross-Sectional Shapes.

Authors:  Hyeonhee Roh; Young Jun Yoon; Jin Soo Park; Dong-Hyun Kang; Seung Min Kwak; Byung Chul Lee; Maesoon Im
Journal:  Nanomicro Lett       Date:  2021-12-09

9.  Temporal structure in spiking patterns of ganglion cells defines perceptual thresholds in rodents with subretinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Elton Ho; Henri Lorach; Georges Goetz; Florian Laszlo; Xin Lei; Theodore Kamins; Jean-Charles Mariani; Alexander Sher; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Stimulation Strategies for Improving the Resolution of Retinal Prostheses.

Authors:  Wei Tong; Hamish Meffin; David J Garrett; Michael R Ibbotson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.