Literature DB >> 25850091

The Retinal Response to Sinusoidal Electrical Stimulation.

Perry Twyford, Shelley Fried.   

Abstract

Rectangular electrical pulses are the primary stimulus waveform used in retinal prosthetics as well as many other neural stimulation applications. Unfortunately, the utility of pulsatile stimuli is limited by the inability to avoid the activation of passing axons, which can result in the distortion of the spatial patterns of elicited neural activity. Because avoiding axons would likely improve clinical outcomes, the examination of alternate stimulus waveforms is warranted. Here, we studied the response of rabbit retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) to sinusoidal electrical stimulation applied at frequencies of 5, 10, 25, and 100 Hz. Targeted RGCs were restricted to 4 common types: OFF-Brisk Transient, OFF-Sustained, ON-Brisk Transient, and ON-Sustained. Interestingly, response patterns varied between different types; the most notable difference was the relatively weak response of ON-Sustained cells to low frequencies. Calculation of total spike counts per trial revealed that lower frequencies are more charge efficient than high frequencies. Finally, experiments utilizing synaptic blockers revealed that 5 and 10 Hz activate photoreceptors while 25 and 100 Hz activate RGCs. Taken together, our results suggest that while sinusoidal electrical stimulation may provide a useful research tool, its clinical utility may be limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25850091      PMCID: PMC4654693          DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2415811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  48 in total

1.  A method for generating precise temporal patterns of retinal spiking using prosthetic stimulation.

Authors:  S I Fried; H A Hsueh; F S Werblin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design.

Authors:  Chris Sekirnjak; Pawel Hottowy; Alexander Sher; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Direct activation and temporal response properties of rabbit retinal ganglion cells following subretinal stimulation.

Authors:  David Tsai; John W Morley; Gregg J Suaning; Nigel H Lovell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes: II-estimation of maximum surface redox (theoretical non-gassing) limits.

Authors:  S B Brummer; M J Turner
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  A wide-field suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis is stable and well tolerated following chronic implantation.

Authors:  Joel Villalobos; David A X Nayagam; Penelope J Allen; Penelope McKelvie; Chi D Luu; Lauren N Ayton; Alexia L Freemantle; Michelle McPhedran; Meri Basa; Ceara C McGowan; Robert K Shepherd; Chris E Williams
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Calcium channel dynamics limit synaptic release in response to prosthetic stimulation with sinusoidal waveforms.

Authors:  Daniel K Freeman; Jed S Jeng; Shawn K Kelly; Espen Hartveit; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Multiple components of ganglion cell desensitization in response to prosthetic stimulation.

Authors:  Daniel K Freeman; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with an ultrafine, extracellular microelectrode.

Authors:  Ralph J Jensen; Joseph F Rizzo; Ofer R Ziv; Andrew Grumet; John Wyatt
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Development of microelectrode arrays for artificial retinal implants using liquid crystal polymers.

Authors:  Seung Woo Lee; Jong-Mo Seo; Seungmin Ha; Eui Tae Kim; Hum Chung; Sung June Kim
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 10.  Neural remodeling in retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Robert E Marc; Bryan W Jones; Carl B Watt; Enrica Strettoi
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 21.198

View more
  12 in total

1.  Temporal properties of network-mediated responses to repetitive stimuli are dependent upon retinal ganglion cell type.

Authors:  Maesoon Im; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Are long stimulus pulse durations the answer to improving spatial resolution in retinal prostheses?

Authors:  Matthew A Petoe; Mohit N Shivdasani
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-11

3.  Mechanisms underlying activation of retinal bipolar cells through targeted electrical stimulation: a computational study.

Authors:  Javad Paknahad; Pragya Kosta; Jean-Marie C Bouteiller; Mark S Humayun; Gianluca Lazzi
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Spatially patterned bi-electrode epiretinal stimulation for axon avoidance at cellular resolution.

Authors:  Ramandeep S Vilkhu; Sasidhar S Madugula; Lauren E Grosberg; Alex R Gogliettino; Pawel Hottowy; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alexander Sher; Alan M Litke; Subhasish Mitra; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Morphological Factors that Underlie Neural Sensitivity to Stimulation in the Retina.

Authors:  Vineeth Raghuram; Paul Werginz; Shelley I Fried; Brian P Timko
Journal:  Adv Nanobiomed Res       Date:  2021-09-01

6.  Improving the spatial resolution of epiretinal implants by increasing stimulus pulse duration.

Authors:  Andrew C Weitz; Devyani Nanduri; Matthew R Behrend; Alejandra Gonzalez-Calle; Robert J Greenberg; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 7.  An update on retinal prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Nick Barnes; Gislin Dagnelie; Takashi Fujikado; Georges Goetz; Ralf Hornig; Bryan W Jones; Mahiul M K Muqit; Daniel L Rathbun; Katarina Stingl; James D Weiland; Matthew A Petoe
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 8.  Visual Prosthesis: Interfacing Stimulating Electrodes with Retinal Neurons to Restore Vision.

Authors:  Alejandro Barriga-Rivera; Lilach Bareket; Josef Goding; Ulises A Aregueta-Robles; Gregg J Suaning
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  The relationship between morphological properties and thresholds to extracellular electric stimulation in α RGCs.

Authors:  Paul Werginz; Vineeth Raghuram; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Stimulus waveform design for decreasing charge and increasing stimulation selectivity in retinal prostheses.

Authors:  Pragya Kosta; Kyle Loizos; Gianluca Lazzi
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2020-06-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.