Literature DB >> 26033477

Indirect activation elicits strong correlations between light and electrical responses in ON but not OFF retinal ganglion cells.

Maesoon Im1,2, Shelley I Fried1,2.   

Abstract

KEY POINTS: To improve the quality of vision elicited by retinal prosthetics, elicited neural activity should resemble physiological signalling patterns; here, we hypothesized that electric stimulation that activates the synaptic circuitry of the retina would lead to closer matches than that which activates ganglion cells directly. We evaluated this hypothesis by comparing light and electrical responses in different types of ganglion cells. In contrast to the similarity in their light responses, electrical responses in ON and OFF cells of the same type were quite distinct. Further, electrical and light responses in the same cell were much better correlated in ON vs. OFF ganglion cells. Stimuli that activated photoreceptors yielded better correlations than those which activated bipolar cells. Our results suggest that the closer match to physiology in the ON signal transmitted to the brain may help to explain preferential reports of 'bright' phosphenes during earlier clinical trials. ABSTRACT: To improve the efficacy of microelectronic retinal prosthetics it will be necessary to better understand the response of retinal neurons to electric stimulation. While stimulation that directly activates ganglion cells generally has the lowest threshold, the similarity in responsiveness across cells makes it extremely difficult for such an approach to re-create cell-type specific patterns of neural activity that arise normally in the healthy retina. In contrast, stimulation that activates neurons presynaptic to ganglion cells utilizes at least some of the existing retinal circuitry and therefore is thought to produce neural activity that better matches physiological signalling. Surprisingly, the actual benefit(s) of this approach remain unsubstantiated. Here, we recorded from ganglion cells in the rabbit retinal explant in response to electrical stimuli that activated the network. Targeted cells were first classified into known types via light responses so that the consistency of electrical responses within individual types could be evaluated. Both transient and sustained ON ganglion cells exhibited highly consistent electrical response patterns which were distinct from one another. Further, properties of the response (interspike interval, latency, peak firing rate, and spike count) in a given cell were well correlated to the corresponding properties of the light response for that same cell. Electric responses in OFF ganglion cells formed two groups, distinct from ON groups, and the correlation levels between electric and light responses were much weaker. The closer match in ON pathway responses may help to explain some preferential reporting of bright stimuli during psychophysical testing.
© 2015 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2015 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26033477      PMCID: PMC4560585          DOI: 10.1113/JP270606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  49 in total

Review 1.  Will retinal implants restore vision?

Authors:  Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Gap junctional coupling underlies the short-latency spike synchrony of retinal alpha ganglion cells.

Authors:  Edward H Hu; Stewart A Bloomfield
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Spike train signatures of retinal ganglion cell types.

Authors:  Günther M Zeck; Richard H Masland
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design.

Authors:  Chris Sekirnjak; Pawel Hottowy; Alexander Sher; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Direct activation and temporal response properties of rabbit retinal ganglion cells following subretinal stimulation.

Authors:  David Tsai; John W Morley; Gregg J Suaning; Nigel H Lovell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Paired-spike interactions and synaptic efficacy of retinal inputs to the thalamus.

Authors:  W M Usrey; J B Reppas; R C Reid
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-09-24       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Morphologies of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with concentric receptive fields.

Authors:  F R Amthor; E S Takahashi; C W Oyster
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1989-02-01       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Rod photoreceptor neurite sprouting in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Z Y Li; I J Kljavin; A H Milam
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Focal electrical stimulation of major ganglion cell types in the primate retina for the design of visual prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren H Jepson; Pawel Hottowy; Keith Mathieson; Deborah E Gunning; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Activation of retinal ganglion cells in wild-type and rd1 mice through electrical stimulation of the retinal neural network.

Authors:  Ralph J Jensen; Joseph F Rizzo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  25 in total

1.  Temporal properties of network-mediated responses to repetitive stimuli are dependent upon retinal ganglion cell type.

Authors:  Maesoon Im; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Subretinal electrical stimulation reveals intact network activity in the blind mouse retina.

Authors:  Henrike Stutzki; Florian Helmhold; Max Eickenscheidt; Günther Zeck
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Enhanced Control of Cortical Pyramidal Neurons With Micromagnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Seung Woo Lee; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Targeted Stimulation of Retinal Ganglion Cells in Epiretinal Prostheses: A Multiscale Computational Study.

Authors:  Javad Paknahad; Kyle Loizos; Mark Humayun; Gianluca Lazzi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Photopharmacological control of bipolar cells restores visual function in blind mice.

Authors:  Laura Laprell; Ivan Tochitsky; Kuldeep Kaur; Michael B Manookin; Marco Stein; David M Barber; Christian Schön; Stylianos Michalakis; Martin Biel; Richard H Kramer; Martin P Sumser; Dirk Trauner; Russell N Van Gelder
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Implications of Neural Plasticity in Retinal Prosthesis.

Authors:  Daniel Caravaca-Rodriguez; Susana P Gaytan; Gregg J Suaning; Alejandro Barriga-Rivera
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.925

7.  Retinal Degeneration Reduces Consistency of Network-Mediated Responses Arising in Ganglion Cells to Electric Stimulation.

Authors:  Young Jun Yoon; Jae-Ik Lee; Ye Ji Jang; Seungki An; Jae Hun Kim; Shelley I Fried; Maesoon Im
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Electric stimulus duration alters network-mediated responses depending on retinal ganglion cell type.

Authors:  Maesoon Im; Paul Werginz; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 9.  Spontaneous Oscillatory Rhythms in the Degenerating Mouse Retina Modulate Retinal Ganglion Cell Responses to Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Yong Sook Goo; Dae Jin Park; Jung Ryul Ahn; Solomon S Senok
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 5.505

10.  The advantage of topographic prominence-adopted filter for the detection of short-latency spikes of retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Jungryul Ahn; Myoung-Hwan Choi; Kwangsoo Kim; Solomon S Senok; Dong-Il Dan Cho; Kyo-In Koo; Yongsook Goo
Journal:  Korean J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.