Literature DB >> 29415876

Electric stimulus duration alters network-mediated responses depending on retinal ganglion cell type.

Maesoon Im1, Paul Werginz, Shelley I Fried.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To improve the quality of artificial vision that arises from retinal prostheses, it is important to bring electrically-elicited neural activity more in line with the physiological signaling patterns that arise normally in the healthy retina. Our previous study reported that indirect activation produces a closer match to physiological responses in ON retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) than in OFF cells (Im and Fried 2015 J. Physiol. 593 3677-96). This suggests that a preferential activation of ON RGCs would shape the overall retinal response closer to natural signaling. Recently, we found that changes to the rate at which stimulation was delivered could bias responses towards a stronger ON component (Im and Fried 2016a J. Neural Eng. 13 025002), raising the possibility that changes to other stimulus parameters can similarly bias towards stronger ON responses. Here, we explore the effects of changing stimulus duration on the responses in ON and OFF types of brisk transient (BT) and brisk sustained (BS) RGCs. APPROACH: We used cell-attached patch clamp to record RGC spiking in the isolated rabbit retina. Targeted RGCs were first classified as ON or OFF type by their light responses, and further sub-classified as BT or BS types by their responses to both light and electric stimuli. Spiking in targeted RGCs was recorded in response to electric pulses with durations varying from 5 to100 ms. Stimulus amplitude was adjusted at each duration to hold total charge constant for all experiments. MAIN
RESULTS: We found that varying stimulus durations modulated responses differentially for ON versus OFF cells: in ON cells, spike counts decreased significantly with increasing stimulus duration while in OFF cells the changes were more modest. The maximum ratio of ON versus OFF responses occurred at a duration of ~10 ms. The difference in response strength for BT versus BS cells was much larger in ON cells than in OFF cells. SIGNIFICANCE: The stimulation rates preferred by subjects during clinical trials are similar to the rates that maximize the ON/OFF response ratio in in vitro testing (Im and Fried 2016a J. Neural Eng. 13 025002). Here, we determine the stimulus duration that produces the strongest bias towards ON responses and speculate that it will further enhance clinical effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29415876      PMCID: PMC5927815          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aaadc1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  79 in total

1.  Resolution of the epiretinal prosthesis is not limited by electrode size.

Authors:  Matthew R Behrend; Ashish K Ahuja; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Gap junctional coupling underlies the short-latency spike synchrony of retinal alpha ganglion cells.

Authors:  Edward H Hu; Stewart A Bloomfield
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Retinal organization in the retinal degeneration 10 (rd10) mutant mouse: a morphological and ERG study.

Authors:  Claudia Gargini; Eva Terzibasi; Francesca Mazzoni; Enrica Strettoi
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Functional stability of retinal ganglion cells after degeneration-induced changes in synaptic input.

Authors:  David J Margolis; Gregory Newkirk; Thomas Euler; Peter B Detwiler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Transient release kinetics of rod bipolar cells revealed by capacitance measurement of exocytosis from axon terminals in rat retinal slices.

Authors:  Leif Oltedal; Espen Hartveit
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Morphologies of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with concentric receptive fields.

Authors:  F R Amthor; E S Takahashi; C W Oyster
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1989-02-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Calcium channel dynamics limit synaptic release in response to prosthetic stimulation with sinusoidal waveforms.

Authors:  Daniel K Freeman; Jed S Jeng; Shawn K Kelly; Espen Hartveit; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Rod photoreceptor neurite sprouting in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Z Y Li; I J Kljavin; A H Milam
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Focal electrical stimulation of major ganglion cell types in the primate retina for the design of visual prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren H Jepson; Pawel Hottowy; Keith Mathieson; Deborah E Gunning; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Directionally selective retinal ganglion cells suppress luminance responses during natural viewing.

Authors:  Maesoon Im; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  19 in total

1.  Targeted Stimulation of Retinal Ganglion Cells in Epiretinal Prostheses: A Multiscale Computational Study.

Authors:  Javad Paknahad; Kyle Loizos; Mark Humayun; Gianluca Lazzi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Morphological Factors that Underlie Neural Sensitivity to Stimulation in the Retina.

Authors:  Vineeth Raghuram; Paul Werginz; Shelley I Fried; Brian P Timko
Journal:  Adv Nanobiomed Res       Date:  2021-09-01

3.  Implications of Neural Plasticity in Retinal Prosthesis.

Authors:  Daniel Caravaca-Rodriguez; Susana P Gaytan; Gregg J Suaning; Alejandro Barriga-Rivera
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.925

4.  Retinal Degeneration Reduces Consistency of Network-Mediated Responses Arising in Ganglion Cells to Electric Stimulation.

Authors:  Young Jun Yoon; Jae-Ik Lee; Ye Ji Jang; Seungki An; Jae Hun Kim; Shelley I Fried; Maesoon Im
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Color and cellular selectivity of retinal ganglion cell subtypes through frequency modulation of electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Javad Paknahad; Kyle Loizos; Lan Yue; Mark S Humayun; Gianluca Lazzi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  Retinal Prosthetic Approaches to Enhance Visual Perception for Blind Patients.

Authors:  Shinyong Shim; Kyungsik Eom; Joonsoo Jeong; Sung June Kim
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  Probing and predicting ganglion cell responses to smooth electrical stimulation in healthy and blind mouse retina.

Authors:  Larissa Höfling; Jonathan Oesterle; Philipp Berens; Günther Zeck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Stimulus waveform design for decreasing charge and increasing stimulation selectivity in retinal prostheses.

Authors:  Pragya Kosta; Kyle Loizos; Gianluca Lazzi
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2020-06-23

Review 9.  Stimulation Strategies for Improving the Resolution of Retinal Prostheses.

Authors:  Wei Tong; Hamish Meffin; David J Garrett; Michael R Ibbotson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Electrical Stimulation Induces Retinal Müller Cell Proliferation and Their Progenitor Cell Potential.

Authors:  Sam Enayati; Karen Chang; Hamida Achour; Kin-Sang Cho; Fuyi Xu; Shuai Guo; Katarina Z Enayati; Jia Xie; Eric Zhao; Tytteli Turunen; Amer Sehic; Lu Lu; Tor Paaske Utheim; Dong Feng Chen
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 7.666

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.