Literature DB >> 11826165

Intrinsic physiological properties of cat retinal ganglion cells.

Brendan J O'Brien1, Tomoki Isayama, Randal Richardson, David M Berson.   

Abstract

Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) are the output neurons of the retina, sending their signals via the optic nerve to many different targets in the thalamus and brainstem. These cells are divisible into more than a dozen types, differing in receptive field properties and morphology. Light responses of individual RGCs are in large part determined by the exact nature of the retinal synaptic network in which they participate. Synaptic inputs, however, are greatly influenced by the intrinsic membrane properties of each cell. While it has been demonstrated clearly that RGCs vary in their intrinsic properties, it remains unclear whether this variation is systematically related to RGC type. To learn whether membrane properties contribute to the functional differentiation of RGC types, we made whole-cell current clamp recordings of RGC responses to injected current of identified cat RGCs. The data collected demonstrated that RGC types clearly differed from one another in their intrinsic properties. One of the most striking differences we observed was that individual cell types had membrane time constants that varied widely from approximately 4 ms (alpha cells) to more than 80 ms (zeta cells). Perhaps not surprisingly, we also observed that RGCs varied greatly in their maximum spike frequencies (kappa cells 48 Hz-alpha cells 262 Hz) and sustained spike frequencies (kappa cells 23 Hz-alpha cells 67 Hz). Interestingly, however, most RGC types exhibited similar amounts of spike frequency adaptation. Finally, RGC types also differed in their responses to injection of hyperpolarizing current. Most cell types exhibited anomalous rectification in response to sufficiently strong hyperpolarization, although alpha and beta RGCs showed only minimal, if any, rectification under similar conditions. The differences we observed in RGC intrinsic properties were striking and robust. Such differences are certain to affect how each type responds to synaptic input and may help tune each cell type appropriately for their individual roles in visual processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11826165      PMCID: PMC2290089          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  82 in total

Review 1.  Action potential repolarization and a fast after-hyperpolarization in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells.

Authors:  J F Storm
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Voltage-dependent conductances of solitary ganglion cells dissociated from the rat retina.

Authors:  S A Lipton; D L Tauck
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The ON-alpha ganglion cell of the cat retina and its presynaptic cell types.

Authors:  M A Freed; P Sterling
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  X-cells in the cat retina: relationships between the morphology and physiology of a class of cat retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  L R Stanford
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A slowly inactivating potassium current truncates spike activity in ganglion cells of the tiger salamander retina.

Authors:  P Lukasiewicz; F Werblin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Temporal integration by a slowly inactivating K+ current in hippocampal neurons.

Authors:  J F Storm
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The structural correlate of the receptive field centre of alpha ganglion cells in the cat retina.

Authors:  L Peichl; H Wässle
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Morphology of physiologically identified X-, Y-, and W-type retinal ganglion cells of the cat.

Authors:  H A Saito
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1983-12-10       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Amacrine cells, bipolar cells and ganglion cells of the cat retina: a Golgi study.

Authors:  H Kolb; R Nelson; A Mariani
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Spatiotemporal frequency responses of cat retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  L J Frishman; A W Freeman; J B Troy; D E Schweitzer-Tong; C Enroth-Cugell
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  80 in total

1.  Different circuits for ON and OFF retinal ganglion cells cause different contrast sensitivities.

Authors:  Kareem A Zaghloul; Kwabena Boahen; Jonathan B Demb
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Availability of low-threshold Ca2+ current in retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Sherwin C Lee; Yuki Hayashida; Andrew T Ishida
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Limit of spared pattern vision following lesions of the immature visual cortex.

Authors:  Bertram R Payne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Dissociation of retinal ganglion cells without enzymes.

Authors:  Yuki Hayashida; Gloria J Partida; Andrew T Ishida
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  A model of high-frequency oscillatory potentials in retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Garrett T Kenyon; Bartlett Moore; Janelle Jeffs; Kate S Denning; Greg J Stephens; Bryan J Travis; John S George; James Theiler; David W Marshak
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.241

6.  Frequency and amplitude modulation have different effects on the percepts elicited by retinal stimulation.

Authors:  Devyani Nanduri; Ione Fine; Alan Horsager; Geoffrey M Boynton; Mark S Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; James D Weiland
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Selective activation of neuronal targets with sinusoidal electric stimulation.

Authors:  Daniel K Freeman; Donald K Eddington; Joseph F Rizzo; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Retinal ganglion cell adaptation to small luminance fluctuations.

Authors:  Daniel K Freeman; Gilberto Graña; Christopher L Passaglia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Differential responses to high-frequency electrical stimulation in ON and OFF retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Perry Twyford; Changsi Cai; Shelley Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Functional and morphological differences among intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Tiffany M Schmidt; Paulo Kofuji
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.