Literature DB >> 25163063

Suppression of subthalamic nucleus activity by micromagnetic stimulation.

Seung Woo Lee, Shelley I Fried.   

Abstract

Magnetic stimulation delivered via 0.5-mm diameter coils was recently shown to activate retinal neurons; the small coil size raises the possibility that micromagnetic stimulation ( μMS) could underlie a new generation of implanted neural prosthetics. Such an approach has several inherent advantages over conventional electric stimulation, including the potential for selective activation of neuronal targets as well as less susceptibility to inflammatory responses. The viability of μMS for some applications, e.g., deep brain stimulation (DBS), may require suppression (rather than creation) of neuronal activity, however, and therefore we explore here whether (μMS) could, in fact, suppress activity. While single pulses elicited weak and inconsistent spiking in neurons of the mouse subthalamic nucleus (in vitro), repetitive stimulation effectively suppressed activity in ∼ 70% of targeted neurons. This is the same percentage suppressed by conventional electric stimulation; with both modalities, suppression occurred only after an initial increase in spiking. The latency to the onset of suppression was inversely correlated to the energy of the stimulus waveform: larger amplitudes and lower frequencies had the fastest onset of suppression. These findings continue to support the viability of μMS as a next-generation implantable neural prosthetic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25163063      PMCID: PMC4467829          DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2348415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  67 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation of retinal neurons in epiretinal and subretinal configuration using a multicapacitor array.

Authors:  Max Eickenscheidt; Martin Jenkner; Roland Thewes; Peter Fromherz; Günther Zeck
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  In vitro biocompatibility of various polymer-based microelectrode arrays for retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  So Hyun Bae; Jeong-Hwan Che; Jong-Mo Seo; Joonsoo Jeong; Eui Tae Kim; Seung Woo Lee; Kyo-in Koo; Gregg J Suaning; Nigel H Lovell; Dong-Il Dan Cho; Sung June Kim; Hum Chung
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Intrinsic dynamics and synaptic inputs control the activity patterns of subthalamic nucleus neurons in health and in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  C J Wilson; M D Bevan
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Responses to pulsatile subretinal electric stimulation: effects of amplitude and duration.

Authors:  Seung Woo Lee; Donald K Eddington; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Transcranial magnetic brain stimulation: therapeutic promises and scientific gaps.

Authors:  Eric M Wassermann; Trelawny Zimmermann
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 6.  Outer retinal degeneration: an electronic retinal prosthesis as a treatment strategy.

Authors:  John I Loewenstein; Sandra R Montezuma; Joseph F Rizzo
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04

7.  The neurons in the primate subthalamic nucleus: a Golgi and electron microscopic study.

Authors:  J A Rafols; C A Fox
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1976-07-01       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  The response of retinal neurons to high-frequency stimulation.

Authors:  Changsi Cai; Perry Twyford; Shelley Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) improves mood in depression.

Authors:  M S George; E M Wassermann; W A Williams; A Callahan; T A Ketter; P Basser; M Hallett; R M Post
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1995-10-02       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Microscopic magnetic stimulation of neural tissue.

Authors:  Giorgio Bonmassar; Seung Woo Lee; Daniel K Freeman; Miloslav Polasek; Shelley I Fried; John T Gale
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  6 in total

1.  Enhanced Control of Cortical Pyramidal Neurons With Micromagnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Seung Woo Lee; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Modeling Intracochlear Magnetic Stimulation: A Finite-Element Analysis.

Authors:  S Mukesh; D T Blake; B J McKinnon; P T Bhatti
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Micro-Coil Design Influences the Spatial Extent of Responses to Intracortical Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Krishnan Thyagarajan; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Selective Activation of Cortical Columns Using Multichannel Magnetic Stimulation With a Bent Flat Microwire Array.

Authors:  Seung Woo Lee
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.756

5.  Planar coil-based contact-mode magnetic stimulation: synaptic responses in hippocampal slices and thermal considerations.

Authors:  Hee-Jin Park; Heekyung Kang; Jihoon Jo; Euiheon Chung; Sohee Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Implantable microcoils for intracortical magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Seung Woo Lee; Florian Fallegger; Bernard D F Casse; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 14.136

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.