Literature DB >> 2249872

Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation.

D B McCreery1, W F Agnew, T G Yuen, L Bullara.   

Abstract

The possibility of neural injury during prolonged electrical stimulation of the brain imposes some constraints on the use of this technique for therapeutic and experimental applications. Stimulating electrodes of various sizes were used to investigate the interactions of two stimulus parameters, charge density and charge per phase, in determining the threshold of neural injury induced by electrical stimulation. Platinum electrodes ranging in size from 0.002 to 0.5 cm2 were implanted over the parietal cortex of adult cats. Penetrating microelectrodes fabricated from iridium, with surface areas of 65 +/- 3 x 10(-6) cm2 were inserted into the parietal cortex. Ten days after implantation, the electrodes were pulsed continuously for 7h using charge balanced, current regulated, symmetric pulse pairs, 400 microseconds per phase in duration, at a repetition rate of 50 Hz. The animals were perfused immediately after the stimulation for histologic evaluation of the brain tissue subjacent to the electrode sites. The results show that charge density (as measured at the surface of the stimulating electrode), and charge per phase, interact in a synergistic manner to determine the threshold of stimulation-induced neural injury. This interaction occurs over a wide range of both parameters; for charge density from at least 10 to 800 microC/cm2 and, for charge per phase, from at least 0.05 to 5.0 microC per phase. The significance of these findings in elucidating the mechanisms underlying stimulation-induced injury is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2249872     DOI: 10.1109/10.102812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  171 in total

1.  In vivo microstimulation with cathodic and anodic asymmetric waveforms modulates spatiotemporal calcium dynamics in cortical neuropil and pyramidal neurons of male mice.

Authors:  Kevin C Stieger; James R Eles; Kip A Ludwig; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Separated interface nerve electrode prevents direct current induced nerve damage.

Authors:  D Michael Ackermann; Niloy Bhadra; Emily L Foldes; Kevin L Kilgore
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Resolution of the epiretinal prosthesis is not limited by electrode size.

Authors:  Matthew R Behrend; Ashish K Ahuja; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Effects of high-rate electrical stimulation upon firing in modelled and real neurons.

Authors:  V Krauthamer; T Crosheck
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Nerve conduction block utilising high-frequency alternating current.

Authors:  K L Kilgore; N Bhadra
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Selective activation of neuronal targets with sinusoidal electric stimulation.

Authors:  Daniel K Freeman; Donald K Eddington; Joseph F Rizzo; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The effects of intraspinal microstimulation on spinal cord tissue in the rat.

Authors:  Jeremy A Bamford; Kathryn G Todd; Vivian K Mushahwar
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 8.  Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Timothy A Wagner; Pedro C Miranda; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Sarah H Lisanby; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  The development of neural stimulators: a review of preclinical safety and efficacy studies.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Joel Villalobos; Owen Burns; David A X Nayagam
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  High γ power in ECoG reflects cortical electrical stimulation effects on unit activity in layers V/VI.

Authors:  Azadeh Yazdan-Shahmorad; Daryl R Kipke; Mark J Lehmkuhle
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.