Literature DB >> 22898882

Genetic counseling for prenatal testing: where is the discussion about disability?

Ellyn Farrelly1, Mildred K Cho, Lori Erby, Debra Roter, Anabel Stenzel, Kelly Ormond.   

Abstract

There are little data revealing how genetic counselors talk about disability in the prenatal setting. We performed a qualitative analysis of 93 existing transcripts from simulated patient (SP) genetic counseling sessions conducted in 2003–4 through the Genetic Counseling Video Project. We found that most genetic counselors (95%) focused on the physical aspects of disability while fewer (27%) discussed the social aspects. In addition, few genetic counselors (38%) asked patients about personal experiences with disability. When discussing options available if a pregnancy were diagnosed with a disability, most genetic counselors mentioned termination (86%) while fewer mentioned the continuation of the pregnancy (37%) or adoption (13%). Only half of the genetic counselors asked the SP if she had thought about how she might use the results of prenatal screening. To better facilitate informed decision-making that is consistent with patient values, we recommend genetic counselors engage prenatal patients in a deeper discussion about their ability and willingness to parent a child with a disability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22898882     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-012-9484-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  31 in total

1.  Disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: reflections and recommendations.

Authors:  Erik Parens; Adrienne Asch
Journal:  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2003

2.  Is modern genetics the new eugenics?

Authors:  Charles J Epstein
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.822

3.  A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.

Authors:  Robert Resta; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Robin L Bennett; Sandra Blum; Susan Estabrooks Hahn; Michelle N Strecker; Janet L Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Examination of standardized patient performance: accuracy and consistency of six standardized patients over time.

Authors:  Lori A H Erby; Debra L Roter; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-11-20

5.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: ethical issues explored.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Suzanne G M Frints; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Will the introduction of non-invasive prenatal diagnostic testing erode informed choices? An experimental study of health care professionals.

Authors:  Ananda van den Heuvel; Lyn Chitty; Elizabeth Dormandy; Ainsley Newson; Zuzana Deans; Sophie Attwood; Shelley Haynes; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-06-26

7.  The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds.

Authors:  G L Albrecht; P J Devlieger
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Disability rights, prenatal diagnosis and eugenics: a cross-cultural view.

Authors:  Aviad E Raz
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Accepting or declining the offer of prenatal screening for congenital defects: test uptake and women's reasons.

Authors:  Matthijs van den Berg; Danielle R M Timmermans; Johanna H Kleinveld; Elisa Garcia; John M G van Vugt; Gerrit van der Wal
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  Motherhood and genetic screening: a personal perspective.

Authors:  Fiona Place
Journal:  Downs Syndr Res Pract       Date:  2008-10
View more
  15 in total

1.  Pregnancy continuation and organizational religious activity following prenatal diagnosis of a lethal fetal defect are associated with improved psychological outcome.

Authors:  Simon Gregory; Allison Ashley-Koch; Heidi Cope; Melanie E Garrett
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  The current state of genetic counseling before and after amniocentesis for fetal karyotyping in Japan: a survey of obstetric hospital clients of a prenatal testing laboratory.

Authors:  Miyuki Nishiyama; Hideaki Sawai; Shinji Kosugi
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Comparing genetic counselor's and patient's perceptions of needs in prenatal chromosomal microarray testing.

Authors:  Sarah A Walser; Katherine S Kellom; Steven C Palmer; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 4.  The relationship between the genetic counseling profession and the disability community: a commentary.

Authors:  Anne C Madeo; Barbara B Biesecker; Campbell Brasington; Lori H Erby; Kathryn F Peters
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: UK genetic counselors' experiences and perspectives.

Authors:  Elizabeth Alexander; Susan Kelly; Lauren Kerzin-Storrar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Balancing Genetics (Science) and Counseling (Art) in Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Testing.

Authors:  Allison Werner-Lin; Judith L M McCoyd; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  A survey on awareness of genetic counseling for non-invasive prenatal testing: the first year experience in Japan.

Authors:  Junko Yotsumoto; Akihiko Sekizawa; Nobuhiro Suzumori; Takahiro Yamada; Osamu Samura; Miyuki Nishiyama; Kiyonori Miura; Hideaki Sawai; Jun Murotsuki; Michihiro Kitagawa; Yoshimasa Kamei; Hideaki Masuzaki; Fumiki Hirahara; Toshiaki Endo; Akimune Fukushima; Akira Namba; Hisao Osada; Yasuyo Kasai; Atsushi Watanabe; Yukiko Katagiri; Naoki Takeshita; Masaki Ogawa; Takashi Okai; Shunichiro Izumi; Haruka Hamanoue; Mayuko Inuzuka; Kazufumi Haino; Naoki Hamajima; Haruki Nishizawa; Yoko Okamoto; Hiroaki Nakamura; Takeshi Kanegawa; Jun Yoshimatsu; Shinya Tairaku; Katsuhiko Naruse; Hisashi Masuyama; Maki Hyodo; Takashi Kaji; Kazuhisa Maeda; Keiichi Matsubara; Masanobu Ogawa; Toshiyuki Yoshizato; Takashi Ohba; Yukie Kawano; Haruhiko Sago
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Attitudes of mothers of children with down syndrome towards noninvasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Gregory Kellogg; Leah Slattery; Louanne Hudgins; Kelly Ormond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Genetic Counseling, Professional Values, and Habitus: An Analysis of Disability Narratives in Textbooks.

Authors:  Amy R Reed
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2018-12

10.  Disability Experiences and Perspectives Regarding Reproductive Decisions, Parenting, and the Utility of Genetic Services: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  C Roadhouse; C Shuman; K Anstey; K Sappleton; D Chitayat; E Ignagni
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.