Literature DB >> 29909595

Disability Experiences and Perspectives Regarding Reproductive Decisions, Parenting, and the Utility of Genetic Services: a Qualitative Study.

C Roadhouse1,2,3,4, C Shuman5,6,7, K Anstey8,9,10, K Sappleton11, D Chitayat5,6,12, E Ignagni13.   

Abstract

Genetic counselors adopt seemingly contradictory roles: advocating for individuals with genetic conditions while offering prenatal diagnosis and the option of selective termination to prevent the birth of a child with a disability. This duality contributes to the tension between the disability and clinical genetics communities. Varying opinions exist amongst the disability community: some value genetic services while others are opposed. However, there is limited research exploring the opinions of individuals with a disability regarding issues related to reproduction and genetic services in the context of personal experience. This exploratory qualitative study involved interviews with seven women and three men who self-identify as having a disability. We sought to gain their perspectives on experiences with disability, thoughts about reproduction and parenting, and perceptions of genetic services. Transcripts of the interviews were analyzed thematically using qualitative content analysis. Data analysis showed that societal views of disability affected the lived experience and impacted reproductive decision-making for those with a disability. It also showed differing interest in genetic services. Concerns about the perceived collective implications of genetic services were also raised. These findings contribute to the understanding of the disability perspective toward reproductive decision-making and genetic services. A further goal is to promote a meaningful dialogue between the genetics and disability communities, with the potential to enhance the genetic and reproductive care provided to individuals with disabilities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attitudes; Disability; Experiential knowledge; Genetic counseling; Parenthood; Prenatal diagnosis

Year:  2018        PMID: 29909595     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0265-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  50 in total

1.  Choices and rights: eugenics, genetics and disability equality.

Authors:  Tom Shakespeare
Journal:  Disabil Soc       Date:  1998-11

2.  Eugenics and nondirectiveness in genetic counseling.

Authors:  Robert G Resta
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Disability advocacy and reproductive choice: engaging with the expressivist objection.

Authors:  Madelyn Peterson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.

Authors:  Robert Resta; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Robin L Bennett; Sandra Blum; Susan Estabrooks Hahn; Michelle N Strecker; Janet L Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Sexuality in children and adolescents with disabilities.

Authors:  Nancy Murphy
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.449

6.  The moral implications of prenatal genetic testing.

Authors:  Peter Chipman
Journal:  Penn Bioeth J       Date:  2006

7.  Reactions of mothers and medical professionals to a film about Down syndrome.

Authors:  W C Cooley; E S Graham; J B Moeschler; J M Graham
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1990-10

8.  'Balance' is in the eye of the beholder: providing information to support informed choices in antenatal screening via Antenatal Screening Web Resource.

Authors:  Shenaz Ahmed; Louise Bryant; Jenny Hewison
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1): knowledge, experience, and reproductive decisions of affected patients and families.

Authors:  C M Benjamin; A Colley; D Donnai; H Kingston; R Harris; L Kerzin-Storrar
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.318

10.  On intimacy, sexual activities and exposure to sexual abuse among children and adolescents with mobility impairment.

Authors:  L Jemtå; K S Fugl-Meyer; K Oberg
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.299

View more
  5 in total

1.  Human genome editing and the identity politics of genetic disability.

Authors:  Felicity Boardman
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-09-06

2.  Preventing lives affected by hemophilia: A mixed methods study of the views of adults with hemophilia and their families toward genetic screening.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman; Rachel Hale; Raksha Gohel; Philip J Young
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.183

3.  How do genetically disabled adults view selective reproduction? Impairment, identity, and genetic screening.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman; Rachel Hale
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2018-09-09       Impact factor: 2.183

4.  Attitudes of people with inherited retinal conditions toward gene editing technology.

Authors:  Lily Hoffman-Andrews; Ronit Mazzoni; Michelle Pacione; Rosemarie Garland-Thomson; Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 2.183

5.  "I didn't take it too seriously because I'd just never heard of it": Experiential knowledge and genetic screening for thalassaemia in the UK.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman; Rachel Hale
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 2.537

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.