Literature DB >> 27207687

Balancing Genetics (Science) and Counseling (Art) in Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Testing.

Allison Werner-Lin1, Judith L M McCoyd2, Barbara A Bernhardt3.   

Abstract

Genetic counselors frequently are called upon to assist patients in understanding the implications of prenatal testing information for their pregnancies and their family's lives. The introduction of highly sensitive testing such as chromosomal microarray has generated additional kinds of uncertainty into the prenatal period. Counselors may feel uncomfortable or inadequately prepared to engage in discussions with prospective parents who are faced with making critical, and timely, decisions about a pregnancy based on uncertain information. As highly sensitive prenatal testing becomes routine in prenatal care, counselors may be in search of approaches to prenatal counseling, as well as specific skills to approach, engage with, and help families find resolution in such challenging circumstances. To assist genetic counselors, we describe practice skills and provide language for approaching conversations with prospective parents. When clinicians regularly provide care to patients and families making life-altering decisions under conditions of significant uncertainty, discomfort is common and compassion fatigue is likely. We make recommendations directly to the genetic counselor working in reproductive and perinatal settings to enhance training and self-care and to decrease discomfort in balancing the scientific- and art- demands of genetic counseling.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetic counseling; Microarray; Prenatal testing; Professional development; Uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27207687     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-9966-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  43 in total

1.  A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.

Authors:  Robert Resta; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Robin L Bennett; Sandra Blum; Susan Estabrooks Hahn; Michelle N Strecker; Janet L Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  When you care enough to do your very best: genetic counselor experiences of compassion fatigue.

Authors:  Lacey G Benoit; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice.

Authors:  Patricia McCarthy Veach; Dianne M Bartels; Bonnie S Leroy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  A quiet revolution: the birth of the genetic counselor at Sarah Lawrence College, 1969.

Authors:  Alexandra Minna Stern
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Conceptualizing genetic counseling as psychotherapy in the era of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Jehannine Austin; Alicia Semaka; George Hadjipavlou
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  It is time: a commentary on "An exploration of genetic counselors' needs and experiences with prenatal chromosomal microarray testing".

Authors:  Krista Redlinger-Grosse
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.

Authors:  S Cohen; T A Wills
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  The importance of communication in collaborative decision making: facilitating shared mind and the management of uncertainty.

Authors:  Mary C Politi; Richard L Street
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 2.431

9.  "Something Extra on Chromosome 5": Parents' Understanding of Positive Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) Results.

Authors:  Sarah A Walser; Allison Werner-Lin; Amita Russell; Ronald J Wapner; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Distress and burnout among genetic service providers.

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Cynda H Rushton; Joseph Carrese; Reed E Pyeritz; Ken Kolodner; Gail Geller
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  4 in total

1.  Expert Knowledge Influences Decision-Making for Couples Receiving Positive Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Testing Results.

Authors:  M A Rubel; A Werner-Lin; F K Barg; B A Bernhardt
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2017-09

Review 2.  A Person-Centered Approach to Cardiovascular Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Julia Platt
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.159

3.  Danish Sonographers' Experiences of the Introduction of "Moderate Risk" in Prenatal Screening for Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Anne Møller; Ida Vogel; Olav Bjørn Petersen; Stina Lou
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2018-10-09

4.  Receiving a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome by phone: a qualitative study of the experiences of pregnant couples.

Authors:  Stina Lou; Kathrine Carstensen; Ida Vogel; Lone Hvidman; Camilla Palmhøj Nielsen; Maja Lanther; Olav Bjørn Petersen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.