Literature DB >> 27604555

A survey on awareness of genetic counseling for non-invasive prenatal testing: the first year experience in Japan.

Junko Yotsumoto1,2, Akihiko Sekizawa2, Nobuhiro Suzumori3, Takahiro Yamada4, Osamu Samura5, Miyuki Nishiyama6, Kiyonori Miura7, Hideaki Sawai8, Jun Murotsuki9, Michihiro Kitagawa10, Yoshimasa Kamei11, Hideaki Masuzaki7, Fumiki Hirahara12, Toshiaki Endo13, Akimune Fukushima14, Akira Namba11, Hisao Osada15, Yasuyo Kasai16, Atsushi Watanabe17, Yukiko Katagiri18, Naoki Takeshita18, Masaki Ogawa19, Takashi Okai20, Shunichiro Izumi21, Haruka Hamanoue12, Mayuko Inuzuka1, Kazufumi Haino22, Naoki Hamajima23, Haruki Nishizawa24, Yoko Okamoto25, Hiroaki Nakamura26, Takeshi Kanegawa27, Jun Yoshimatsu28, Shinya Tairaku29, Katsuhiko Naruse30, Hisashi Masuyama31, Maki Hyodo32, Takashi Kaji33, Kazuhisa Maeda34, Keiichi Matsubara35, Masanobu Ogawa36, Toshiyuki Yoshizato37, Takashi Ohba38, Yukie Kawano39, Haruhiko Sago6.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to summarize the results from a survey on awareness of genetic counseling for pregnant women who wish to receive non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in Japan. As a component of a clinical study by the Japan NIPT Consortium, genetic counseling was conducted for women who wished to receive NIPT, and a questionnaire concerning both NIPT and genetic counseling was given twice: once after pre-test counseling and again when test results were reported. The responses of 7292 women were analyzed. They expressed high satisfaction with the genetic counseling system of the NIPT Consortium (94%). The number of respondents who indicated that genetic counseling is necessary for NIPT increased over time. Furthermore, they highly valued genetic counseling provided by skilled clinicians, such as clinical geneticists or genetic counselors. The vast majority (90%) responded that there was sufficient opportunity to consider the test ahead of time. Meanwhile, women who received positive test results had a poor opinion and expressed a low-degree satisfaction. We confirmed that the pre-test genetic counseling that we conducted creates an opportunity for pregnant women to sufficiently consider prenatal testing, promotes its understanding and has possibilities to effectively facilitate informed decision making after adequate consideration. A more careful and thorough approach is considered to be necessary for women who received positive test results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27604555     DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2016.96

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1434-5161            Impact factor:   3.172


  23 in total

1.  The state of the medical geneticist workforce: findings of the 2003 survey of American Board of Medical Genetics certified geneticists.

Authors:  Judith A Cooksey; Gaetano Forte; Judith Benkendorf; Miriam G Blitzer
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.822

2.  Attitudes toward non-invasive prenatal diagnosis among pregnant women and health professionals in Japan.

Authors:  Junko Yotsumoto; Akihiko Sekizawa; Keiko Koide; Yuditiya Purwosunu; Kiyotake Ichizuka; Ryu Matsuoka; Hiroshi Kawame; Takashi Okai
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Attitudes of women of advanced maternal age undergoing invasive prenatal diagnosis and the impact of genetic counselling.

Authors:  Lea Godino; Eva Pompilii; Federica D'Anna; Antonio M Morselli-Labate; Elena Nardi; Marco Seri; Nicola Rizzo; Gianluigi Pilu; Daniela Turchetti
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Is it time to sound an alarm about false-positive cell-free DNA testing for fetal aneuploidy?

Authors:  Michael T Mennuti; Athena M Cherry; Jennifer J D Morrissette; Lorraine Dugoff
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: UK genetic counselors' experiences and perspectives.

Authors:  Elizabeth Alexander; Susan Kelly; Lauren Kerzin-Storrar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  NIPT: current utilization and implications for the future of prenatal genetic counseling.

Authors:  Amanda Buchanan; Amy Sachs; Tomi Toler; Judith Tsipis
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Women's views and the impact of noninvasive prenatal testing on procedures in a managed care setting.

Authors:  George E Tiller; Hilary B Kershberg; John Goff; Christin Coffeen; Wayne Liao; Amy J Sehnert
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  NSGC practice guideline: prenatal screening and diagnostic testing options for chromosome aneuploidy.

Authors:  K L Wilson; J L Czerwinski; J M Hoskovec; S J Noblin; C M Sullivan; A Harbison; M W Campion; K Devary; P Devers; C N Singletary
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Noninvasive prenatal testing: impact on genetic counseling, invasive prenatal diagnosis, and trisomy 21 detection.

Authors:  Joseph R Wax; Angelina Cartin; Renée Chard; F Lee Lucas; Michael G Pinette
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 0.910

10.  The practice of clinical genetics: a survey of practitioners.

Authors:  Beth A Pletcher; Ethan A B Jewett; William L Cull; Sarah E Brotherton; H Eugene Hoyme; Richard J D Pan; Holly J Mulvey
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  5 in total

1.  Patterns of the utilization of prenatal diagnosis services among pregnant women, their satisfaction and its associated factors in Viet Nam.

Authors:  Duong Thi Thuy Doan; Huong Thi Thu Nguyen; Ha Thi Thu Bui
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Qualitative investigation of the factors that generate ambivalent feelings in women who give birth after receiving negative results from non-invasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Junko Yotsumoto; Akihiko Sekizawa; Satomi Inoue; Nobuhiro Suzumori; Osamu Samura; Takahiro Yamada; Kiyonori Miura; Hideaki Masuzaki; Hideaki Sawai; Jun Murotsuki; Haruka Hamanoue; Yoshimasa Kamei; Toshiaki Endo; Akimune Fukushima; Yukiko Katagiri; Naoki Takeshita; Masaki Ogawa; Haruki Nishizawa; Yoko Okamoto; Shinya Tairaku; Takashi Kaji; Kazuhisa Maeda; Keiichi Matsubara; Masanobu Ogawa; Hisao Osada; Takashi Ohba; Yukie Kawano; Aiko Sasaki; Haruhiko Sago
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Attitude changes toward prenatal testing among women with twin pregnancies after the introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing: A single-center study in Japan.

Authors:  Masanobu Ogawa; Yasuyuki Hasuo; Yumiko Taura; Ryosuke Tsunematsu; Sawako Shikada; Yuki Matsushita; Kazuo Sato
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 1.697

4.  The Knowledge, Attitude, Practices, and Satisfaction of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing among Chinese Pregnant Women under Different Payment Schemes: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Wenjun Zhu; XiaoXiao Ling; Wenru Shang; Jiayan Huang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Pathophysiology of Preeclampsia: The Role of Exosomes.

Authors:  Keiichi Matsubara; Yuko Matsubara; Yuka Uchikura; Takashi Sugiyama
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.