Literature DB >> 25315608

Non-invasive prenatal testing: UK genetic counselors' experiences and perspectives.

Elizabeth Alexander1, Susan Kelly, Lauren Kerzin-Storrar.   

Abstract

To date, NIPT in the UK has been predominately used in the health service for early sexing of pregnancies at known risk of sex-linked conditions. Developments in the technology are broadening its use to diagnostic testing for paternally inherited genetic conditions and for detection of aneuploidy. This study aimed to examine the experiences of UK genetic counselors with offering NIPT for sexing, and to explore their views on future uses of the technology. Twenty interviews with practicing GC's from four centres were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed using modified grounded theory. Participants all had experience of counseling patients around prenatal diagnosis and 18/20 had experience of offering NIPT. GCs reported initially feeling cautious about offering the test, although they saw it as a positive advance for their patients at genetic risk. Emphasis was placed on accuracy, adequate counseling provision and gatekeeping with concerns expressed about broadening its use in the routine antenatal setting. Findings indicate the genetics model for offering prenatal testing to high risk patients can incorporate NIPT and the profession may have a role in informing its implementation in wider healthcare settings. In a wider context this study highlights the challenges new technologies bring to genetic counselors' practice and service structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25315608     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9765-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  55 in total

Review 1.  Factors affecting the clinical use of non-invasive prenatal testing: a mixed methods systematic review.

Authors:  Heather Skirton; Christine Patch
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: ethical issues explored.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Suzanne G M Frints; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Will the introduction of non-invasive prenatal diagnostic testing erode informed choices? An experimental study of health care professionals.

Authors:  Ananda van den Heuvel; Lyn Chitty; Elizabeth Dormandy; Ainsley Newson; Zuzana Deans; Sophie Attwood; Shelley Haynes; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-06-26

4.  Noninvasive prenatal testing: the paradigm is shifting rapidly.

Authors:  Lyn S Chitty; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: pregnant women's interest and expected uptake.

Authors:  Reana Tischler; Louanne Hudgins; Yair J Blumenfeld; Henry T Greely; Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Uptake of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in women following positive aneuploidy screening.

Authors:  Shilpa Chetty; Matthew J Garabedian; Mary E Norton
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  NIPT in a clinical setting: an analysis of uptake in the first months of clinical availability.

Authors:  Joanne B Taylor; Valerie Y Chock; Louanne Hudgins
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Digital PCR analysis of maternal plasma for noninvasive detection of sickle cell anemia.

Authors:  Angela N Barrett; Thomas C R McDonnell; K C Allen Chan; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Position statement on opportunistic genomic screening from the Association of Genetic Nurses and Counsellors (UK and Ireland).

Authors:  Anna Middleton; Chris Patch; Jennifer Wiggins; Kathy Barnes; Gill Crawford; Caroline Benjamin; Anita Bruce
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Views and preferences for the implementation of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for single gene disorders from health professionals in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Melissa Hill; Madhavi Karunaratna; Celine Lewis; Frida Forya; Lyn Chitty
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 2.802

View more
  9 in total

1.  Genetic Counselors' Perspectives About Cell-Free DNA: Experiences, Challenges, and Expectations for Obstetricians.

Authors:  Patricia K Agatisa; Mary Beth Mercer; Marissa Coleridge; Ruth M Farrell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Perspectives of Pregnant People and Clinicians on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Meredith Vanstone; Alexandra Cernat; Umair Majid; Forum Trivedi; Chanté De Freitas
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

3.  A survey on awareness of genetic counseling for non-invasive prenatal testing: the first year experience in Japan.

Authors:  Junko Yotsumoto; Akihiko Sekizawa; Nobuhiro Suzumori; Takahiro Yamada; Osamu Samura; Miyuki Nishiyama; Kiyonori Miura; Hideaki Sawai; Jun Murotsuki; Michihiro Kitagawa; Yoshimasa Kamei; Hideaki Masuzaki; Fumiki Hirahara; Toshiaki Endo; Akimune Fukushima; Akira Namba; Hisao Osada; Yasuyo Kasai; Atsushi Watanabe; Yukiko Katagiri; Naoki Takeshita; Masaki Ogawa; Takashi Okai; Shunichiro Izumi; Haruka Hamanoue; Mayuko Inuzuka; Kazufumi Haino; Naoki Hamajima; Haruki Nishizawa; Yoko Okamoto; Hiroaki Nakamura; Takeshi Kanegawa; Jun Yoshimatsu; Shinya Tairaku; Katsuhiko Naruse; Hisashi Masuyama; Maki Hyodo; Takashi Kaji; Kazuhisa Maeda; Keiichi Matsubara; Masanobu Ogawa; Toshiyuki Yoshizato; Takashi Ohba; Yukie Kawano; Haruhiko Sago
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  Genetic Counseling for Couples Seeking Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Japan: Experiences of Pregnant Women and their Partners.

Authors:  Motoko Watanabe; Mari Matsuo; Masaki Ogawa; Toshitaka Uchiyama; Satoru Shimizu; Naoko Iwasaki; Akemi Yamauchi; Mari Urano; Hironao Numabe; Kayoko Saito
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Global perspectives on clinical adoption of NIPT.

Authors:  Mollie A Minear; Celine Lewis; Subarna Pradhan; Subhashini Chandrasekharan
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Development and validation of a measure of informed choice for women undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Melissa Hill; Heather Skirton; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 7.  Has noninvasive prenatal testing impacted termination of pregnancy and live birth rates of infants with Down syndrome?

Authors:  Melissa Hill; Angela Barrett; Mahesh Choolani; Celine Lewis; Jane Fisher; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  What Do Parents of Children with Down Syndrome Think about Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)?

Authors:  Rachèl V van Schendel; Adriana Kater-Kuipers; Elsbeth H van Vliet-Lachotzki; Wybo J Dondorp; Martina C Cornel; Lidewij Henneman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Offering non-invasive prenatal testing as part of routine clinical service. Can high levels of informed choice be maintained?

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Melissa Hill; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.050

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.