Literature DB >> 22894215

Obtaining reliable phase-gradient delays from otoacoustic emission data.

Christopher A Shera1, Christopher Bergevin.   

Abstract

Reflection-source otoacoustic emission phase-gradient delays are widely used to obtain noninvasive estimates of cochlear function and properties, such as the sharpness of mechanical tuning and its variation along the length of the cochlear partition. Although different data-processing strategies are known to yield different delay estimates and trends, their relative reliability has not been established. This paper uses in silico experiments to evaluate six methods for extracting delay trends from reflection-source otoacoustic emissions (OAEs). The six methods include both previously published procedures (e.g., phase smoothing, energy-weighting, data exclusion based on signal-to-noise ratio) and novel strategies (e.g., peak-picking, all-pass factorization). Although some of the methods perform well (e.g., peak-picking), others introduce substantial bias (e.g., phase smoothing) and are not recommended. In addition, since standing waves caused by multiple internal reflection can complicate the interpretation and compromise the application of OAE delays, this paper develops and evaluates two promising signal-processing strategies, the first based on time-frequency filtering using the continuous wavelet transform and the second on cepstral analysis, for separating the direct emission from its subsequent reflections. Altogether, the results help to resolve previous disagreements about the frequency dependence of human OAE delays and the sharpness of cochlear tuning while providing useful analysis methods for future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22894215      PMCID: PMC3427360          DOI: 10.1121/1.4730916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  44 in total

1.  Distortion-product source unmixing: a test of the two-mechanism model for DPOAE generation.

Authors:  R Kalluri; C A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Modeling the combined effects of basilar membrane nonlinearity and roughness on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission fine structure.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; A Tubis; G R Long; C Tong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Multiple internal reflections in the cochlea and their effect on DPOAE fine structure.

Authors:  Sumitrajit Dhar; Carrick L Talmadge; Glenis R Long; Arnold Tubis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Probing cochlear tuning and tonotopy in the tiger using otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Edward J Walsh; JoAnn McGee; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Wave and place fixed DPOAE maps of the human ear.

Authors:  R D Knight; D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Frequency selectivity in Old-World monkeys corroborates sharp cochlear tuning in humans.

Authors:  Philip X Joris; Christopher Bergevin; Radha Kalluri; Myles Mc Laughlin; Pascal Michelet; Marcel van der Heijden; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Human cochlear tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Thomas Bentsen; James M Harte; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  22 in total

1.  Measuring stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions using swept tones.

Authors:  Radha Kalluri; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

3.  Effects of Forward- and Emitted-Pressure Calibrations on the Variability of Otoacoustic Emission Measurements Across Repeated Probe Fits.

Authors:  Tom Maxim; Christopher A Shera; Karolina K Charaziak; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Latency of tone-burst-evoked auditory brain stem responses and otoacoustic emissions: level, frequency, and rise-time effects.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Michael Argenyi; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effect of stimulus bandwidth on the nonlinear-derived tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Shawn S Goodman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-23

6.  Estimating cochlear frequency selectivity with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in chinchillas.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-18

7.  Frequency shifts in distortion-product otoacoustic emissions evoked by swept tones.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Comparison of time-frequency methods for analyzing stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Milan Biswal; Srikanta K Mishra
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A common microstructure in behavioral hearing thresholds and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Towards a Diagnosis of Cochlear Neuropathy with Envelope Following Responses.

Authors:  Luke A Shaheen; Michelle D Valero; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.