Literature DB >> 11867706

Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements.

Christopher A Shera1, John J Guinan, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

We develop an objective, noninvasive method for determining the frequency selectivity of cochlear tuning at low and moderate sound levels. Applicable in humans at frequencies of 1 kHz and above, the method is based on the measurement of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and, unlike previous noninvasive physiological methods, does not depend on the frequency selectivity of masking or suppression. The otoacoustic measurements indicate that at low sound levels human cochlear tuning is more than twice as sharp as implied by standard behavioral studies and has a different dependence on frequency. New behavioral measurements designed to minimize the influence of nonlinear effects such as suppression agree with the emission-based values. A comparison of cochlear tuning in cat, guinea pig, and human indicates that, contrary to common belief, tuning in the human cochlea is considerably sharper than that found in the other mammals. The sharper tuning may facilitate human speech communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11867706      PMCID: PMC122516          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.032675099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  32 in total

1.  Interrelations among distortion-product phase-gradient delays: their connection to scaling symmetry and its breaking.

Authors:  C A Shera; C L Talmadge; A Tubis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Frequency tuning of basilar membrane and auditory nerve fibers in the same cochleae.

Authors:  S S Narayan; A N Temchin; A Recio; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-12-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Basilar membrane motion.

Authors:  G Zweig
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1976

6.  Auditory filter shapes in forward masking as a function of level.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The cochlear frequency map for the cat: labeling auditory-nerve fibers of known characteristic frequency.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate. II. Cochlear anatomy.

Authors:  B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin; R Probst; A C Coats
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6-20 channels.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; J Fitzke; Z Tu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  186 in total

1.  Revisiting place and temporal theories of pitch.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Acoust Sci Technol       Date:  2013

2.  Otoacoustic emissions from residual oscillations of the cochlear basilar membrane in a human ear model.

Authors:  Renato Nobili; Ales Vetesnik; Lorenzo Turicchia; Fabio Mammano
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

3.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

4.  Perception of across-frequency asynchrony and the role of cochlear delays.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on otoacoustic and neural measures suggest that stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions originate near the peak region of the traveling wave.

Authors:  Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-15

6.  Tectorial membrane morphological variation: effects upon stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; David S Velenovsky; Kevin E Bonine
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Coherent reflection without traveling waves: on the origin of long-latency otoacoustic emissions in lizards.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Isoresponse versus isoinput estimates of cochlear filter tuning.

Authors:  Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-23

9.  Towards a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile: Results in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.

Authors:  Uzma Shaheen Wilson; Jenna Browning-Kamins; Sriram Boothalingam; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.