Literature DB >> 29195446

A common microstructure in behavioral hearing thresholds and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

James B Dewey1, Sumitrajit Dhar1.   

Abstract

Behavioral hearing thresholds and otoacoustic emission (OAE) spectra often exhibit quasiperiodic fluctuations with frequency. For behavioral and OAE responses to single tones-the latter referred to as stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs)-this microstructure has been attributed to intracochlear reflections of SFOAE energy between its region of generation and the middle ear boundary. However, the relationship between behavioral and SFOAE microstructures, as well as their presumed dependence on the properties of the SFOAE-generation mechanism, have yet to be adequately examined. To address this, behavioral thresholds and SFOAEs evoked by near-threshold tones were compared in 12 normal-hearing female subjects. The microstructures observed in thresholds and both SFOAE amplitudes and delays were found to be strikingly similar. SFOAE phase accumulated an integer number of cycles between the frequencies of microstructure maxima, consistent with a dependence of microstructure periodicity on SFOAE propagation delays. Additionally, microstructure depth was correlated with SFOAE magnitude in a manner resembling that predicted by the intracochlear reflection framework, after assuming reasonable values of parameters related to middle ear transmission. Further exploration of this framework may yield more precise estimates of such parameters and provide insight into their frequency dependence.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29195446      PMCID: PMC5693793          DOI: 10.1121/1.5009562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  43 in total

1.  Correspondence amongst microstructure patterns observed in otoacoustic emissions and Békésy audiometry.

Authors:  M E Lutman; J Deeks
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct

2.  Comparing stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured by compression, suppression, and spectral smoothing.

Authors:  Radha Kalluri; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Obtaining reliable phase-gradient delays from otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Are human spontaneous otoacoustic emissions generated by a chain of coupled nonlinear oscillators?

Authors:  Hero P Wit; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration.

Authors:  Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar; Rebekah Abel; Renee Banakis; Evan Grolley; Jungwha Lee; Steven Zecker; Jonathan Siegel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Modification of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions and associated psychoacoustic microstructure by aspirin consumption.

Authors:  G R Long; A Tubis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Interrelation of different oto-acoustic emissions.

Authors:  E Zwicker; E Schloth
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The microstructure of quiet and masked thresholds.

Authors:  G R Long
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Towards a model for the origin of cochlear echoes.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Profiles of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions from 0.5 to 20 kHz in Humans.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-28
View more
  6 in total

1.  A test of model classes accounting for individual differences in the cocktail-party effect.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Briana Rodriguez; Jungmee Lee; Torben Pastore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Link between stimulus otoacoustic emissions fine structure peaks and standing wave resonances in a cochlear model.

Authors:  Haiqi Wen; Julien Meaud
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Molecular analysis of individual differences in talker search at the cocktail-party.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Torben Pastore; Briana Rodriguez; William A Yost; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

Review 4.  The role of the medial olivocochlear reflex in psychophysical masking and intensity resolution in humans: a review.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.974

5.  Objective Assessment System for Hearing Prediction Based on Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Qin Gong; Yin Liu; Runyi Xu; Dong Liang; Zewen Peng; Honghao Yang
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  The Listener Effect in Multitalker Speech Segregation and Talker Identification.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Briana Rodriguez; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.