Literature DB >> 12765394

Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning.

Christopher A Shera1, John J Guinan.   

Abstract

This paper tests and applies a key prediction of the theory of coherent reflection filtering for the generation of reflection-source otoacoustic emissions. The theory predicts that reflection-source-emission group delay is determined by the group delay of the basilar-membrane (BM) transfer function at its peak. This prediction is tested over a seven-octave frequency range in cats and guinea pigs using measurements of stimulus-frequency-emission (SFOAE) group delay. A comparison with group delays calculated from published measurements of BM mechanical transfer functions supports the theory at the basal end of the cochlea. A comparison across the whole frequency range based on variations in the sharpness of neural tuning with characteristic frequency (CF) suggests that the predicted relation holds in the basal-most 60% of the cochlea. At the apical end of the cochlea, however, the measurements disagree with neural and mechanical group delays. This disagreement suggests that there are important differences in cochlear mechanics and/or mechanisms of emission generation between the base and apex of the cochlea. Measurements in humans over a four-octave range indicate that human SFOAE group delays are roughly a factor of 3 longer than their counterparts in cat and guinea pig but manifest similar trends across CF. The measurements thus reveal global deviations from scaling whose form appears quantitatively similar in all three species. Interpreted using the theory of coherent reflection filtering, the group delay measurements indicate that the wavelength at the peak of the traveling wave decreases with increasing CF at a rate of roughly 25% per octave in the base of the cochlea. The measurements and analysis reported here illustrate the rich potential inherent in OAE measurements for obtaining valuable information about basic cochlear properties such as tuning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12765394     DOI: 10.1121/1.1557211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  87 in total

1.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

2.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on otoacoustic and neural measures suggest that stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions originate near the peak region of the traveling wave.

Authors:  Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-15

3.  Tectorial membrane morphological variation: effects upon stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; David S Velenovsky; Kevin E Bonine
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Coherent reflection without traveling waves: on the origin of long-latency otoacoustic emissions in lizards.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Probing cochlear tuning and tonotopy in the tiger using otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Edward J Walsh; JoAnn McGee; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Reverse correlation analysis of auditory-nerve fiber responses to broadband noise in a bird, the barn owl.

Authors:  Bertrand Fontaine; Christine Köppl; Jose L Peña
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-15

7.  Cochlear Reflectance and Otoacoustic Emission Predictions of Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Stephen T Neely; Sara E Fultz; Judy G Kopun; Natalie M Lenzen; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured with amplitude-modulated suppressor tones (L).

Authors:  Stephen T Neely; Tiffany A Johnson; Cassie A Garner; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission measured with continuously varying stimulus level.

Authors:  Stephen T Neely; Tiffany A Johnson; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Sex differences in distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions compared.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.