Literature DB >> 29495731

Comparison of time-frequency methods for analyzing stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Milan Biswal1, Srikanta K Mishra1.   

Abstract

Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) can have multiple time varying components, including multiple internal reflections. It is, therefore, necessary to study SFOAEs using techniques that can represent their time-frequency behavior. Although various time-frequency schemes can be applied to identify and filter SFOAE components, their accuracy for SFOAE analysis has not been investigated. The relative performance of these methods is important for accurate characterization of SFOAEs that may, in turn, enhance the understanding of SFOAE generation. This study using in silico experiments examined the performance of three linear (short-time Fourier transform, continuous wavelet transform, Stockwell transform) and two nonlinear (empirical mode decomposition and synchrosqueezed wavelet transform) time-frequency approaches for SFOAE analysis. Their performances in terms of phase-gradient delay estimation, frequency specificity, and spectral component extraction are compared, and the relative merits and limitations of each method are discussed. Overall, this paper provides a comparative analysis of various time-frequency methods useful for otoacoustic emission applications.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29495731      PMCID: PMC5796829          DOI: 10.1121/1.5022783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Coherent reflection without traveling waves: on the origin of long-latency otoacoustic emissions in lizards.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sparse time-frequency representations.

Authors:  Timothy J Gardner; Marcelo O Magnasco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Comparison of spectral analysis methods for characterizing brain oscillations.

Authors:  Marieke K van Vugt; Per B Sederberg; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Transient evoked otoacoustic emission latency and cochlear tuning at different stimulus levels.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Arturo Moleti
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Measuring stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions using swept tones.

Authors:  Radha Kalluri; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Obtaining reliable phase-gradient delays from otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Time-frequency distributions of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  G Tognola; F Grandori; P Ravazzani
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Time-frequency decomposition of click evoked otoacoustic emissions in children.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Milan Biswal
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Salient features of otoacoustic emissions are common across tetrapod groups and suggest shared properties of generation mechanisms.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Geoffrey A Manley; Christine Köppl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Input-output functions of the nonlinear-distortion component of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal and hearing-impaired human ears.

Authors:  Dennis Zelle; Lisa Lorenz; John P Thiericke; Anthony W Gummer; Ernst Dalhoff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of Forward- and Emitted-Pressure Calibrations on the Variability of Otoacoustic Emission Measurements Across Repeated Probe Fits.

Authors:  Tom Maxim; Christopher A Shera; Karolina K Charaziak; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.