Literature DB >> 22645048

Probing cochlear tuning and tonotopy in the tiger using otoacoustic emissions.

Christopher Bergevin1, Edward J Walsh, JoAnn McGee, Christopher A Shera.   

Abstract

Otoacoustic emissions (sound emitted from the ear) allow cochlear function to be probed noninvasively. The emissions evoked by pure tones, known as stimulus-frequency emissions (SFOAEs), have been shown to provide reliable estimates of peripheral frequency tuning in a variety of mammalian and non-mammalian species. Here, we apply the same methodology to explore peripheral auditory function in the largest member of the cat family, the tiger (Panthera tigris). We measured SFOAEs in 9 unique ears of 5 anesthetized tigers. The tigers, housed at the Henry Doorly Zoo (Omaha, NE), were of both sexes and ranged in age from 3 to 10 years. SFOAE phase-gradient delays are significantly longer in tigers--by approximately a factor of two above 2 kHz and even more at lower frequencies--than in domestic cats (Felis catus), a species commonly used in auditory studies. Based on correlations between tuning and delay established in other species, our results imply that cochlear tuning in the tiger is significantly sharper than in domestic cat and appears comparable to that of humans. Furthermore, the SFOAE data indicate that tigers have a larger tonotopic mapping constant (mm/octave) than domestic cats. A larger mapping constant in tiger is consistent both with auditory brainstem response thresholds (that suggest a lower upper frequency limit of hearing for the tiger than domestic cat) and with measurements of basilar-membrane length (about 1.5 times longer in the tiger than domestic cat).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22645048      PMCID: PMC3493156          DOI: 10.1007/s00359-012-0734-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  35 in total

1.  Intracellular labeling of auditory nerve fibers in guinea pig: central and peripheral projections.

Authors:  J Tsuji; M C Liberman
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1997-05-05       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions in the Northern leopard frog, Rana pipiens pipiens: implications for inner ear mechanics.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Sound pressure distribution and power flow within the gerbil ear canal from 100 Hz to 80 kHz.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Elizabeth S Olson; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  A review of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  R Probst; B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

Authors:  D D Greenwood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A physiological place-frequency map of the cochlea in the CBA/J mouse.

Authors:  Marcus Müller; Karen von Hünerbein; Silvi Hoidis; Jean W T Smolders
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 7.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The middle ear of a lion: comparison of structure and function to domestic cat.

Authors:  G T Huang; J J Rosowski; D T Flandermeyer; T J Lynch; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The relationship of the spiral turns of the cochlea and the length of the basilar membrane to the range of audible frequencies in ground dwelling mammals.

Authors:  C D West
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Involution of the auditory neuro-epithelium in a tiger (Panthera tigris) and a jaguar (Panthera onca).

Authors:  L Ulehlová; H Burda; L Voldrich
Journal:  J Comp Pathol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 1.311

View more
  4 in total

1.  Obtaining reliable phase-gradient delays from otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Link between stimulus otoacoustic emissions fine structure peaks and standing wave resonances in a cochlear model.

Authors:  Haiqi Wen; Julien Meaud
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  High-resolution frequency tuning but not temporal coding in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Eric Verschooten; Christian Desloovere; Philip X Joris
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Mammalian behavior and physiology converge to confirm sharper cochlear tuning in humans.

Authors:  Christian J Sumner; Toby T Wells; Christopher Bergevin; Joseph Sollini; Heather A Kreft; Alan R Palmer; Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.