Literature DB >> 22752324

Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam CT: a clinical application.

T E Reeves1, P Mah, W D McDavid.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present a clinical study demonstrating a method to derive Hounsfield units from grey levels in cone beam CT (CBCT).
METHODS: An acrylic intraoral reference object with aluminium, outer bone equivalent material (cortical bone), inner bone equivalent material (trabecular bone), polymethlymethacrylate and water equivalent material was used. Patients were asked if they would be willing to have an acrylic bite plate with the reference object placed in their mouth during a routine CBCT scan. There were 31 scans taken on the Asahi Alphard 3030 (Belmont Takara, Kyoto, Japan) and 30 scans taken on the Planmeca ProMax 3D (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland) CBCT. Linear regression between the grey levels of the reference materials and their linear attenuation coefficients was performed for various photon energies. The energy with the highest regression coefficient was chosen as the effective energy. The attenuation coefficients for the five materials at the effective energy were scaled as Hounsfield units using the standard Hounsfield units equation and compared to those derived from the measured grey levels of the materials using the regression equation.
RESULTS: In general, there was a satisfactory linear relation between the grey levels and the attenuation coefficients. This made it possible to calculate Hounsfield units from the measured grey levels. Uncertainty in determining effective energies resulted in unrealistic effective energies and significant variability of calculated CT numbers. Linear regression from grey levels directly to Hounsfield units at specified energies resulted in greater consistency.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical application of a method for deriving Hounsfield units from grey levels in CBCT was demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22752324      PMCID: PMC3520389          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/31640433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  13 in total

1.  Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan.

Authors:  M R Norton; C Gamble
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.977

2.  Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  P Mah; T E Reeves; W D McDavid
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Density conversion factor determined using a cone-beam computed tomography unit NewTom QR-DVT 9000.

Authors:  M O Lagravère; Y Fang; J Carey; R W Toogood; G V Packota; P W Major
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice.

Authors:  William C Scarfe; Allan G Farman; Predag Sukovic
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  Relationship between density variability and imaging volume size in cone-beam computerized tomographic scanning of the maxillofacial region: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Akitoshi Katsumata; Akiko Hirukawa; Shinji Okumura; Munetaka Naitoh; Masami Fujishita; Eiichiro Ariji; Robert P Langlais
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2008-08-20

6.  Bone density at interradicular sites: implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement.

Authors:  Y S Chun; W H Lim
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Study of the scan uniformity from an i-CAT cone beam computed tomography dental imaging system.

Authors:  J A Bryant; N A Drage; S Richmond
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Differential diagnosis of large periapical lesions using cone-beam computed tomography measurements and biopsy.

Authors:  James H S Simon; Reyes Enciso; Jose-Maria Malfaz; Ramon Roges; Michelle Bailey-Perry; Anish Patel
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; P I Brånemark; H A Hansson; J Lindström
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1981

10.  Relations between the bone density values from computerized tomography, and implant stability parameters: a clinical study of 230 regular platform implants.

Authors:  Ilser Turkyilmaz; Celal Tumer; Esma Nida Ozbek; Tolga F Tözüm
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 8.728

View more
  29 in total

1.  Hounsfield unit change in root and alveolar bone during canine retraction.

Authors:  Feifei Jiang; Sean S-Y Liu; Zeyang Xia; Shuning Li; Jie Chen; Katherine S Kula; George Eckert
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 2.  CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable?

Authors:  R Pauwels; R Jacobs; S R Singer; M Mupparapu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 3.  Quality assurance phantoms for cone beam computed tomography: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Marcus V L de Oliveira; Ann Wenzel; Paulo S F Campos; Rubens Spin-Neto
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Reproducibility of CBCT image analysis: a clinical study on intrapersonal and interpersonal errors in bone structure determination.

Authors:  Sigmar Schnutenhaus; Michael Graf; Isabel Doering; Ralph G Luthardt; Heike Rudolph
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 5.  Bone mineral density in cone beam computed tomography: Only a few shades of gray.

Authors:  Marcio José da Silva Campos; Thainara Salgueiro de Souza; Sergio Luiz Mota Júnior; Marcelo Reis Fraga; Robert Willer Farinazzo Vitral
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-28

6.  Influence of exposure factors on the variability of CBCT voxel values: a phantom study.

Authors:  M L Oliveira; D Q Freitas; G M B Ambrosano; F Haiter-Neto
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Comparison of Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Derived Alveolar Bone Density Between Subjects with and without Aggressive Periodontitis.

Authors:  Mohammad S Al-Zahrani; Eman Y Elfirt; Manea M Al-Ahmari; Ibrahim A Yamany; Maher A Alabdulkarim; Khalid H Zawawi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-01-01

8.  Can gray values derived from CT and cone beam CT estimate new bone formation? An in vivo study.

Authors:  Farshid Bastami; Shahriar Shahab; Azin Parsa; Fatemeh Mashhadi Abbas; Mohammad Hadi Noori Kooshki; Mahshid Namdari; Hamidreza Azimi Lisar; Tohid Rafiei; Farahnaz Fahimipour; Majid Salehi; Maissa Jafari
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-10-31

9.  Investigation of dental cone-beam CT pixel data and a modified method for conversion to Hounsfield unit (HU).

Authors:  Dennise Magill; Natalie Beckmann; Marc A Felice; Thomas Yoo; Minou Luo; Mel Mupparapu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Comprehensive quality assurance phantom for the small animal radiation research platform (SARRP).

Authors:  M Jermoumi; H Korideck; M Bhagwat; P Zygmanski; G M Makrigiogos; R I Berbeco; R C Cormack; W Ngwa
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.685

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.