Literature DB >> 30484198

Reproducibility of CBCT image analysis: a clinical study on intrapersonal and interpersonal errors in bone structure determination.

Sigmar Schnutenhaus1,2, Michael Graf3, Isabel Doering4, Ralph G Luthardt5, Heike Rudolph5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: For correct implant planning based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), the bone contour must be accurately determined. Identification of the contour is difficult in bones with incomplete mineralization. In this clinical study, we investigated the intrapersonal and interpersonal reproducibilities of manual bone contour determination on CBCT images using a semi-automated computerized process.
METHODS: The bone surface level in the area of the socket in 20 patients who had undergone tooth extraction from the upper jaw at 10 ± 1 weeks previously was determined on CBCT images. Two investigators with different levels of experience determined the bone structure initially (T0) and repeated the procedure after 3 months (T1). The bone structure marked on CBCT images was converted into a surface data set. The resulting data sets were superimposed on one another. In the analyses, the shortest distances between the datasets were identified and measured. The average deviations were statistically evaluated.
RESULTS: The intrapersonal evaluation resulted in an average deviation of 0.18 mm across both investigators. The interpersonal analysis comparing the two investigators resulted in average deviations of 0.15 mm at T0 and 0.26 mm at T1. Significant differences were not found.
CONCLUSIONS: The low intrapersonal deviation indicates that the procedure has satisfactory reproducibility. All deviations were within the range of the selected resolution of the CBCT device. Application of a semi-automated procedure to detect the bone border in areas with incomplete mineralization is a predictable process. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform of the WHO: DRKS00004769, date of registration: 28 February 2013; and DRKS00005978, date of registration: 09 November 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Bone surface determination; CBCT; Guided implantology; Observer error

Year:  2018        PMID: 30484198     DOI: 10.1007/s11282-018-0340-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Radiol        ISSN: 0911-6028            Impact factor:   1.852


  24 in total

1.  Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam CT: a clinical application.

Authors:  T E Reeves; P Mah; W D McDavid
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  Artefacts in CBCT: a review.

Authors:  R Schulze; U Heil; D Gross; D D Bruellmann; E Dranischnikow; U Schwanecke; E Schoemer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Reliability and reproducibility of linear mandible measurements with the use of a cone-beam computed tomography and two object inclinations.

Authors:  C Tomasi; E Bressan; B Corazza; S Mazzoleni; E Stellini; A Lith
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions.

Authors:  A A Al-Ekrish; M Ekram
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Sanjana Patrick; N Praveen Birur; Keerthi Gurushanth; A Shubhasini Raghavan; Shubha Gurudath
Journal:  Indian J Dent Res       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb

6.  Evaluation of reliability and reproducibility of linear measurements of cone-beam-computed tomography.

Authors:  Thiago de Santana Santos; Ana Cláudia Amorim Gomes; Daniela Guimarães de Melo; Auremir Rocha Melo; Josuel Raimundo Cavalcante; Lorena Cássia Gueiros de Araújo; Rosana Maria Coelho Travassos; Paulo Ricardo Saquete Martins-Filho; Marta Rabelo Piva; Heitor Fontes Silva
Journal:  Indian J Dent Res       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug

Review 7.  Bone mineral density in cone beam computed tomography: Only a few shades of gray.

Authors:  Marcio José da Silva Campos; Thainara Salgueiro de Souza; Sergio Luiz Mota Júnior; Marcelo Reis Fraga; Robert Willer Farinazzo Vitral
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-28

8.  A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template.

Authors:  Marjolein Vercruyssen; Catherine Cox; Wim Coucke; Ignace Naert; Reinhilde Jacobs; Marc Quirynen
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 8.728

9.  Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Will Schlicher; Ib Nielsen; John C Huang; Koutaro Maki; David C Hatcher; A J Miller
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  Can dental cone beam computed tomography assess bone mineral density?

Authors:  Do-Gyoon Kim
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2014-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.