M L Oliveira1, D Q Freitas, G M B Ambrosano, F Haiter-Neto. 1. Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba Dental School, Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of milliamperage and kilovolt peak (kVp) on the variability of cone beam CT (CBCT) voxel values. METHODS: CBCT scans were obtained from radiographic phantoms in varying concentrations of dipotassium hydrogen phosphate solutions (200-1200 mg ml(-1)) under different protocols of milliamperage and kVp. In addition, scans were performed with and without a dental implant and exo-mass. The variability of CBCT voxel values was measured on each scan, and factorial analysis of variance and the post hoc Tukey test were performed (α = 0.05). Linear regression was performed to assess the relationship between voxel value variability and dipotassium hydrogen phosphate concentration. RESULTS: milliamperage and the presence of a dental implant did not produce significant interference (p = 0.28 and 0.87, respectively) in voxel value variability. Scans at the highest kVp value presented a significant reduction (p ≤ 0.0001) in voxel value variability when only exo-mass was not present. Voxel value variability was not influenced by exo-mass in scans at the highest levels of milliamperage and kVp. The presence of exo-mass produced a significant reduction (p ≤ 0.0001) in voxel value variability in most of the scans. Higher concentrations yielded greater variations in voxel values in all scans, except for those operating at the highest levels of mAs and kVp. CONCLUSIONS: mAs did not influence the variability of CBCT voxel values; higher kVp reduced such variability when only the object was smaller than the field of view.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of milliamperage and kilovolt peak (kVp) on the variability of cone beam CT (CBCT) voxel values. METHODS: CBCT scans were obtained from radiographic phantoms in varying concentrations of dipotassium hydrogen phosphate solutions (200-1200 mg ml(-1)) under different protocols of milliamperage and kVp. In addition, scans were performed with and without a dental implant and exo-mass. The variability of CBCT voxel values was measured on each scan, and factorial analysis of variance and the post hoc Tukey test were performed (α = 0.05). Linear regression was performed to assess the relationship between voxel value variability and dipotassium hydrogen phosphate concentration. RESULTS: milliamperage and the presence of a dental implant did not produce significant interference (p = 0.28 and 0.87, respectively) in voxel value variability. Scans at the highest kVp value presented a significant reduction (p ≤ 0.0001) in voxel value variability when only exo-mass was not present. Voxel value variability was not influenced by exo-mass in scans at the highest levels of milliamperage and kVp. The presence of exo-mass produced a significant reduction (p ≤ 0.0001) in voxel value variability in most of the scans. Higher concentrations yielded greater variations in voxel values in all scans, except for those operating at the highest levels of mAs and kVp. CONCLUSIONS: mAs did not influence the variability of CBCT voxel values; higher kVp reduced such variability when only the object was smaller than the field of view.
Authors: R Schulze; U Heil; D Gross; D D Bruellmann; E Dranischnikow; U Schwanecke; E Schoemer Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: R Pauwels; O Nackaerts; N Bellaiche; H Stamatakis; K Tsiklakis; A Walker; H Bosmans; R Bogaerts; R Jacobs; K Horner Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Anne Caroline Oenning; Benjamin Salmon; Karla de Faria Vasconcelos; Laura Ferreira Pinheiro Nicolielo; Ivo Lambrichts; Gerard Sanderink; Ruben Pauwels; Reinhilde Jacobs Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: R Pauwels; L Seynaeve; J C G Henriques; C de Oliveira-Santos; P C Souza; F H Westphalen; I R F Rubira-Bullen; R F Ribeiro-Rotta; M I B Rockenbach; F Haiter-Neto; P Pittayapat; H Bosmans; R Bogaerts; R Jacobs Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2015-06-19 Impact factor: 2.419