Literature DB >> 18715805

Relationship between density variability and imaging volume size in cone-beam computerized tomographic scanning of the maxillofacial region: an in vitro study.

Akitoshi Katsumata1, Akiko Hirukawa, Shinji Okumura, Munetaka Naitoh, Masami Fujishita, Eiichiro Ariji, Robert P Langlais.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In limited-volume cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging, projection data discontinuity caused by maxillofacial hard tissue structures outside the reconstructed volume are reported to affect the density value of the hard and soft tissue structures within the volume. The intensity of this effect is purported to be related to the size of the imaging volume. The aim of this study was to characterize the effect of the size of the scanned volume on density values in vitro. STUDY
DESIGN: Test objects were positioned in a custom phantom in the following 4 patterns: bimandible and vertebrae, bimandible, left mandible and vertebrae, and left mandible. We used a newly developed flat panel detector CBCT system (Alphard Vega; Asahi Roentgen, Kyoto, Japan) to acquire scans of the left molar region using cylindrical volumes of approximately 5, 10, 15, and 20 cm in diameter and height. The density values of the mandible and the adjacent soft tissue regions were analyzed.
RESULTS: Highest density variability was observed in the smallest-volume (5 cm) scans. Density variability increased when more objects were included outside the area being imaged. Fewer effects were noted in CBCT scans of larger (10, 15, and 20 cm) volumes.
CONCLUSION: Larger-volume CBCT scans may yield more consistent density values. Smaller CBCT volumes have the advantages of better image resolution and lower radiation doses. The optimization of the image characteristics is maximized by careful consideration of the purpose of the CBCT examination.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18715805     DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.05.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  48 in total

1.  Characterization and correction of cupping effect artefacts in cone beam CT.

Authors:  A K Hunter; W D McDavid
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam CT: a clinical application.

Authors:  T E Reeves; P Mah; W D McDavid
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Accuracy of linear intraoral measurements using cone beam CT and multidetector CT: a tale of two CTs.

Authors:  R Patcas; G Markic; L Müller; O Ullrich; T Peltomäki; C J Kellenberger; C A Karlo
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Comparison of the influence of FOV sizes and different voxel resolutions for the assessment of periodontal defects.

Authors:  M E Kolsuz; N Bagis; K Orhan; H Avsever; K Ö Demiralp
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 5.  CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable?

Authors:  R Pauwels; R Jacobs; S R Singer; M Mupparapu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Effect of voxel size on detection of fenestration, dehiscence and furcation defects using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Masoumeh Eftekhar; Hanieh Kaviani; Nina Rouzmeh; Aitin Torabinia; Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Conditions and calibration to obtain comparable grey values between different clinical cone beam computed tomography scanners.

Authors:  Gregory M England; Eun-Sang Moon; Jordan Roth; Toru Deguchi; Allen R Firestone; F Michael Beck; Do-Gyoon Kim
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Influence of cone beam CT scanning parameters on grey value measurements at an implant site.

Authors:  A Parsa; N Ibrahim; B Hassan; A Motroni; P van der Stelt; D Wismeijer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Variability of dental cone beam CT grey values for density estimations.

Authors:  R Pauwels; O Nackaerts; N Bellaiche; H Stamatakis; K Tsiklakis; A Walker; H Bosmans; R Bogaerts; R Jacobs; K Horner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Influence of scanning and reconstruction parameters on quality of three-dimensional surface models of the dental arches from cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Bassam Hassan; Paulo Couto Souza; Reinhilde Jacobs; Soraya de Azambuja Berti; Paul van der Stelt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.