Literature DB >> 11168274

Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan.

M R Norton1, C Gamble.   

Abstract

Dental implants are subject to masticatory loads of varying magnitude. Implant performance is closely related to load transmission at the bone-to-implant interface where bone quality will be highly variable. The type and architecture of bone is known to influence its load bearing capacity and it has been demonstrated that poorer quality bone is associated with higher failure rates. To date, bone classifications have only provided rough subjective methods for pre-operative assessment, which can prove unreliable. The results of an extensive analysis of computerized tomography scans using Simplant software (Columbia Scientific Inc., Columbia, MD, USA) demonstrate that an objective scale of bone density based on the Houndsfield scale, can be established and that there is a strong correlation between bone density value and subjective quality score (P = 0.002) as well as between the bone density score and the region of the mouth (P < 0.001).

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11168274     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001079.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  74 in total

1.  Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam CT: a clinical application.

Authors:  T E Reeves; P Mah; W D McDavid
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  P Mah; T E Reeves; W D McDavid
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Bone density changes around teeth during orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Jui-Ting Hsu; Hsun-Wen Chang; Heng-Li Huang; Jian-Hong Yu; Yu-Fen Li; Ming-Gene Tu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Ultralow dose dentomaxillofacial CT imaging and iterative reconstruction techniques: variability of Hounsfield units and contrast-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Gerlig Widmann; Alexander Bischel; Andreas Stratis; Apoorv Kakar; Hilde Bosmans; Reinhilde Jacobs; Eva-Maria Gassner; Wolfgang Puelacher; Ruben Pauwels
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Hounsfield unit change in root and alveolar bone during canine retraction.

Authors:  Feifei Jiang; Sean S-Y Liu; Zeyang Xia; Shuning Li; Jie Chen; Katherine S Kula; George Eckert
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 6.  Imaging technology in implant diagnosis.

Authors:  Christos Angelopoulos; Tara Aghaloo
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2011-01

7.  Full rehabilitation with nobel clinician(®) and procera implant bridge(®): case report.

Authors:  D Spinelli; L Ottria; G DE Vico; R Bollero; A Barlattani; P Bollero
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2013-10-15

8.  The role of CT analyses of the sternal end of the clavicle and the first costal cartilage in age estimation.

Authors:  Petar Milenkovic; Marija Djuric; Petar Milovanovic; Ksenija Djukic; Vladimir Zivkovic; Slobodan Nikolic
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.686

9.  Variability of dental cone beam CT grey values for density estimations.

Authors:  R Pauwels; O Nackaerts; N Bellaiche; H Stamatakis; K Tsiklakis; A Walker; H Bosmans; R Bogaerts; R Jacobs; K Horner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Injectable bone tissue engineering using expanded mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Yoichi Yamada; Sayaka Nakamura; Kenji Ito; Eri Umemura; Kenji Hara; Tetsuro Nagasaka; Akihiro Abe; Shunsuke Baba; Yasushi Furuichi; Yuichi Izumi; Ophir D Klein; Toshihiko Wakabayashi
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.