Literature DB >> 18812597

Study of the scan uniformity from an i-CAT cone beam computed tomography dental imaging system.

J A Bryant1, N A Drage, S Richmond.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: As part of an ongoing programme to improve diagnosis and treatment planning relevant to implant placement, orthodontic treatment and dentomaxillofacial surgery, a study has been made of the spatial accuracy and density response of an i-CAT, a cone beam CT (CBCT) dental imaging system supplied by Imaging Sciences International Inc.
METHODS: Custom-made phantoms using acrylic sheet and water were used for measurements on spatial accuracy, density response and noise. The measurements were made over a period of several months on a clinical machine rather than on a machine dedicated to research.
RESULTS: Measurements on a precision grid showed the spatial accuracy to be universally within the tolerance of +/-1 pixel. The density response and the noise in the data were found to depend strongly on the mass in the slice being scanned.
CONCLUSIONS: The density response was subject to two effects. The first effect changes the whole slice uniformly and linearly depends on the total mass in the slice. The second effect exists when there is mass outside the field of view, dubbed the "exo-mass" effect. This effect lowers the measured CT number rapidly at the scan edge furthest from the exo-mass and raises it on the adjacent edge. The noise also depended quasi-linearly on the mass in the slice. Some general performance rules were drafted to describe these effects and a preliminary correction algorithm was constructed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18812597     DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/13227258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  28 in total

1.  Characterization and correction of cupping effect artefacts in cone beam CT.

Authors:  A K Hunter; W D McDavid
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam CT: a clinical application.

Authors:  T E Reeves; P Mah; W D McDavid
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Deriving Hounsfield units from the grey scale of a CBCT?

Authors:  J Bryant
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Accuracy of linear intraoral measurements using cone beam CT and multidetector CT: a tale of two CTs.

Authors:  R Patcas; G Markic; L Müller; O Ullrich; T Peltomäki; C J Kellenberger; C A Karlo
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Influence of object location in different FOVs on trabecular bone microstructure measurements of human mandible: a cone beam CT study.

Authors:  N Ibrahim; A Parsa; B Hassan; P van der Stelt; I H A Aartman; P Nambiar
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 6.  CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable?

Authors:  R Pauwels; R Jacobs; S R Singer; M Mupparapu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 7.  Quality assurance phantoms for cone beam computed tomography: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Marcus V L de Oliveira; Ann Wenzel; Paulo S F Campos; Rubens Spin-Neto
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 8.  Bone mineral density in cone beam computed tomography: Only a few shades of gray.

Authors:  Marcio José da Silva Campos; Thainara Salgueiro de Souza; Sergio Luiz Mota Júnior; Marcelo Reis Fraga; Robert Willer Farinazzo Vitral
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-28

9.  Evaluation of intensity of artefacts in CBCT by radio-opacity of composite simulation models of implants in vitro.

Authors:  N Kuusisto; P K Vallittu; L V J Lassila; S Huumonen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Variability of dental cone beam CT grey values for density estimations.

Authors:  R Pauwels; O Nackaerts; N Bellaiche; H Stamatakis; K Tsiklakis; A Walker; H Bosmans; R Bogaerts; R Jacobs; K Horner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.