Literature DB >> 25315442

CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable?

R Pauwels1, R Jacobs, S R Singer, M Mupparapu.   

Abstract

CBCT is a widely applied imaging modality in dentistry. It enables the visualization of high-contrast structures of the oral region (bone, teeth, air cavities) at a high resolution. CBCT is now commonly used for the assessment of bone quality, primarily for pre-operative implant planning. Traditionally, bone quality parameters and classifications were primarily based on bone density, which could be estimated through the use of Hounsfield units derived from multidetector CT (MDCT) data sets. However, there are crucial differences between MDCT and CBCT, which complicates the use of quantitative gray values (GVs) for the latter. From experimental as well as clinical research, it can be seen that great variability of GVs can exist on CBCT images owing to various reasons that are inherently associated with this technique (i.e. the limited field size, relatively high amount of scattered radiation and limitations of currently applied reconstruction algorithms). Although attempts have been made to correct for GV variability, it can be postulated that the quantitative use of GVs in CBCT should be generally avoided at this time. In addition, recent research and clinical findings have shifted the paradigm of bone quality from a density-based analysis to a structural evaluation of the bone. The ever-improving image quality of CBCT allows it to display trabecular bone patterns, indicating that it may be possible to apply structural analysis methods that are commonly used in micro-CT and histology.

Keywords:  Hounsfield units; bone quality; cone-beam computed tomography; dental implants

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25315442      PMCID: PMC4277442          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20140238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  92 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative radiologic planning of implant surgery in compromised patients.

Authors:  Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 7.589

2.  Measuring bone density in healing periapical lesions by using cone beam computed tomography: a clinical investigation.

Authors:  Sadullah Kaya; Izzet Yavuz; Ibrahim Uysal; Zeki Akkuş
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 4.171

3.  Density conversion factor determined using a cone-beam computed tomography unit NewTom QR-DVT 9000.

Authors:  M O Lagravère; Y Fang; J Carey; R W Toogood; G V Packota; P W Major
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  The assessment of trabecular bone parameters and cortical bone strength: a comparison of micro-CT and dental cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Jui-Ting Hsu; Shun-Ping Wang; Heng-Li Huang; Ying-Ju Chen; Jay Wu; Ming-Tzu Tsai
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Cone beam computerized tomography: the effect of calibration of the Hounsfield unit number to electron density on dose calculation accuracy for adaptive radiation therapy.

Authors:  Joan Hatton; Boyd McCurdy; Peter B Greer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Bone density: comparative evaluation of Hounsfield units in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Isabela Maria de Carvalho Crusoé Silva; Deborah Queiroz de Freitas; Glaucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano; Frab Norberto Bóscolo; Solange Maria Almeida
Journal:  Braz Oral Res       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec

7.  A decade of bisphosphonate bone complications: what it has taught us about bone physiology.

Authors:  Robert E Marx
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Does cone beam computed tomography-derived bone density give predictable data about stability changes of immediately loaded implants?: A 1-year resonance frequency follow-up study.

Authors:  Ufuk Tatli; Fariz Salimov; Mehmet Kürkcü; Mücahide Akoğlan; Cem Kurtoğlu
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.046

9.  Internal or in-scan validation: a method to assess CBCT and MSCT gray scales using a human cadaver.

Authors:  Péter Bujtár; János Simonovics; Gergely Zombori; Zsolt Fejer; Attila Szucs; Attila Bojtos; Wilson Otto Batista; Károly Váradi; George K B Sándor
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2014-02-24

10.  CBCT fractal dimension changes at the apex of immediate implants placed using undersized drilling.

Authors:  Oscar González-Martín; Ernesto A Lee; Mario Veltri
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 5.977

View more
  66 in total

1.  Ultralow dose dentomaxillofacial CT imaging and iterative reconstruction techniques: variability of Hounsfield units and contrast-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Gerlig Widmann; Alexander Bischel; Andreas Stratis; Apoorv Kakar; Hilde Bosmans; Reinhilde Jacobs; Eva-Maria Gassner; Wolfgang Puelacher; Ruben Pauwels
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Determination of size-specific exposure settings in dental cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Ruben Pauwels; Reinhilde Jacobs; Ria Bogaerts; Hilde Bosmans; Soontra Panmekiate
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Novel three-dimensional methods to analyze the morphology of the nasal cavity and pharyngeal airway.

Authors:  Xiaowen Niu; Sivaranjani Madhan; Marie A Cornelis; Paolo M Cattaneo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 4.  Capability of CBCT to identify patients with low bone mineral density: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eliete N S Guerra; Fabiana T Almeida; Fernanda V Bezerra; Paulo T D S Figueiredo; Maria A G Silva; Graziela De Luca Canto; Camila Pachêco-Pereira; André F Leite
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Reproducibility of CBCT image analysis: a clinical study on intrapersonal and interpersonal errors in bone structure determination.

Authors:  Sigmar Schnutenhaus; Michael Graf; Isabel Doering; Ralph G Luthardt; Heike Rudolph
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 6.  Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art.

Authors:  R Pauwels; K Araki; J H Siewerdsen; S S Thongvigitmanee
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Effect of exposure parameters and voxel size on bone structure analysis in CBCT.

Authors:  R Pauwels; T Faruangsaeng; T Charoenkarn; N Ngonphloy; S Panmekiate
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  A brief introduction to concepts and applications of artificial intelligence in dental imaging.

Authors:  Ruben Pauwels
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  Comparison of Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Derived Alveolar Bone Density Between Subjects with and without Aggressive Periodontitis.

Authors:  Mohammad S Al-Zahrani; Eman Y Elfirt; Manea M Al-Ahmari; Ibrahim A Yamany; Maher A Alabdulkarim; Khalid H Zawawi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-01-01

10.  An ex vivo study of automated motion artefact correction and the impact on cone beam CT image quality and interpretability.

Authors:  Rubens Spin-Neto; Louise H Matzen; Lars W Schropp; Thomas S Sørensen; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.