Literature DB >> 22699999

NEMA NU 4-2008 comparison of preclinical PET imaging systems.

Andrew L Goertzen1, Qinan Bao, Mélanie Bergeron, Eric Blankemeyer, Stephan Blinder, Mario Cañadas, Arion F Chatziioannou, Katherine Dinelle, Esmat Elhami, Hans-Sonke Jans, Eduardo Lage, Roger Lecomte, Vesna Sossi, Suleman Surti, Yuan-Chuan Tai, Juan José Vaquero, Esther Vicente, Darin A Williams, Richard Laforest.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) standard NU 4-2008 for performance measurements of small-animal tomographs was recently published. Before this standard, there were no standard testing procedures for preclinical PET systems, and manufacturers could not provide clear specifications similar to those available for clinical systems under NEMA NU 2-1994 and 2-2001. Consequently, performance evaluation papers used methods that were modified ad hoc from the clinical PET NEMA standard, thus making comparisons between systems difficult.
METHODS: We acquired NEMA NU 4-2008 performance data for a collection of commercial animal PET systems manufactured since 2000: microPET P4, microPET R4, microPET Focus 120, microPET Focus 220, Inveon, ClearPET, Mosaic HP, Argus (formerly eXplore Vista), VrPET, LabPET 8, and LabPET 12. The data included spatial resolution, counting-rate performance, scatter fraction, sensitivity, and image quality and were acquired using settings for routine PET.
RESULTS: The data showed a steady improvement in system performance for newer systems as compared with first-generation systems, with notable improvements in spatial resolution and sensitivity.
CONCLUSION: Variation in system design makes direct comparisons between systems from different vendors difficult. When considering the results from NEMA testing, one must also consider the suitability of the PET system for the specific imaging task at hand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22699999      PMCID: PMC4128012          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.099382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  13 in total

1.  Performance evaluation of the microPET P4: a PET system dedicated to animal imaging.

Authors:  C Tai; A Chatziioannou; S Siegel; J Young; D Newport; R N Goble; R E Nutt; S R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Performance evaluation of the microPET focus: a third-generation microPET scanner dedicated to animal imaging.

Authors:  Yuan-Chuan Tai; Ananya Ruangma; Douglas Rowland; Stefan Siegel; Danny F Newport; Patrick L Chow; Richard Laforest
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Design features and performance of a PET system for animal research.

Authors:  P D Cutler; S R Cherry; E J Hoffman; W M Digby; M E Phelps
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  A high resolution PET for animal studies.

Authors:  M Watanabe; H Uchida; H Okada; K Shimizu; N Satoh; E Yoshikawa; T Ohmura; T Yamashita; E Tanaka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Spatial resolution and sensitivity of the Inveon small-animal PET scanner.

Authors:  Eric P Visser; Jonathan A Disselhorst; Maarten Brom; Peter Laverman; Martin Gotthardt; Wim J G Oyen; Otto C Boerman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  The design and physical characteristics of a small animal positron emission tomograph.

Authors:  P M Bloomfield; S Rajeswaran; T J Spinks; S P Hume; R Myers; S Ashworth; K M Clifford; W F Jones; L G Byars; J Young
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Performance evaluation of the GE healthcare eXplore VISTA dual-ring small-animal PET scanner.

Authors:  Yuchuan Wang; Jurgen Seidel; Benjamin M W Tsui; Juan J Vaquero; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Performance evaluation of the microPET R4 PET scanner for rodents.

Authors:  Christof Knoess; Stefan Siegel; Anne Smith; Danny Newport; Norbert Richerzhagen; Alexandra Winkeler; Andreas Jacobs; Rhonda N Goble; Rudolf Graf; Klaus Wienhard; Wolf-Dieter Heiss
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Performance evaluation of the inveon dedicated PET preclinical tomograph based on the NEMA NU-4 standards.

Authors:  Qinan Bao; Danny Newport; Mu Chen; David B Stout; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  NEMA NU 2-2007 performance measurements of the Siemens Inveon preclinical small animal PET system.

Authors:  Brad J Kemp; Carrie B Hruska; Aaron R McFarland; Mark W Lenox; Val J Lowe
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  56 in total

1.  Evaluation of Hamamatsu PET imaging modules for dedicated TOF-capable scanners.

Authors:  A Stolin; G Jaliparthi; R R Raylman; J Brefczynski-Lewis; S Majewski; J Qi; K Gong; S Dolinsky
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2019-01-23

2.  Image quality of Zr-89 PET imaging in the Siemens microPET Focus 220 preclinical scanner.

Authors:  Tyler J Bradshaw; Martin J Voorbach; David R Reuter; Anthony M Giamis; Sarah R Mudd; John D Beaver
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Scatter characterization and correction for simultaneous multiple small-animal PET imaging.

Authors:  Rameshwar Prasad; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  On the assessment of spatial resolution of PET systems with iterative image reconstruction.

Authors:  Kuang Gong; Simon R Cherry; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Preclinical imaging: an essential ally in modern biosciences.

Authors:  Lídia Cunha; Ildiko Horvath; Sara Ferreira; Joana Lemos; Pedro Costa; Domingos Vieira; Dániel S Veres; Krisztián Szigeti; Teresa Summavielle; Domokos Máthé; Luís F Metello
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 6.  Quantitative Rodent Brain Receptor Imaging.

Authors:  Kristina Herfert; Julia G Mannheim; Laura Kuebler; Sabina Marciano; Mario Amend; Christoph Parl; Hanna Napieczynska; Florian M Maier; Salvador Castaneda Vega; Bernd J Pichler
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Small animal, positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging system based on a clinical magnetic resonance imaging scanner: evaluation of basic imaging performance.

Authors:  Raymond R Raylman; Patrick Ledden; Alexander V Stolin; Bob Hou; Ganghadar Jaliparthi; Peter F Martone
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-09-08

8.  Preclinical positron emission tomography scanner based on a monolithic annulus of scintillator: initial design study.

Authors:  Alexander V Stolin; Peter F Martone; Gangadhar Jaliparthi; Raymond R Raylman
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-01-05

9.  Investigation of Image Reconstruction Parameters of the Mediso nanoScan PC Small-Animal PET/CT Scanner for Two Different Positron Emitters Under NEMA NU 4-2008 Standards.

Authors:  Anastasios Gaitanis; George A Kastis; Elena Vlastou; Penelope Bouziotis; Panayotis Verginis; Constantinos D Anagnostopoulos
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Performance Evaluation of G8, a High-Sensitivity Benchtop Preclinical PET/CT Tomograph.

Authors:  Zheng Gu; Richard Taschereau; Nam T Vu; David L Prout; Robert W Silverman; Jason T Lee; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.