Literature DB >> 12536244

Performance evaluation of the microPET R4 PET scanner for rodents.

Christof Knoess1, Stefan Siegel, Anne Smith, Danny Newport, Norbert Richerzhagen, Alexandra Winkeler, Andreas Jacobs, Rhonda N Goble, Rudolf Graf, Klaus Wienhard, Wolf-Dieter Heiss.   

Abstract

The microPET R4 scanner is a dedicated positron emission tomograph (PET) for studies of rodents. A number of scanner parameters such as spatial resolution, sensitivity, scatter, and count rate performance were determined in this work, which showed that the microPET R4 is a suitable PET scanner for small animals like mice and rats. In the center of the field of view (FOV) a maximal sensitivity of 43.66 cps/kBq for a centered point source was calculated from a measurement with a germanium-68 line source within an energy widow of 250-750 keV. A spatial resolution of 1.85 mm full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) in the axial direction and 1.66 mm FWHM in the transaxial direction was measured in the center with a 1-mm-diameter sodium-22 point source. Within the inner 20 mm of the FOV the volumetric resolution is better than 15.6 micro l, corresponding to a linear resolution of less than 2.5 mm in all three dimensions. Images of a high-resolution phantom and from mice and rat studies illustrate the good performance of the scanner. A maximal noise equivalent count rate (NECR) was reached at 174 kcps for a mouse phantom and at 93 kcps for a rat phantom (energy window 250-750 keV). Scatter fractions were measured between 0.30 and 0.42 for an energy window of 250-750 keV and phantom diameters similar to mice and rats. A comparison with the microPET P4 model for primates illustrates the gain in sensitivity due to a smaller detector ring diameter but also the changes in NECR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12536244     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-002-1052-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  64 in total

1.  Quantitative, simultaneous PET/MRI for intratumoral imaging with an MRI-compatible PET scanner.

Authors:  Thomas S C Ng; James R Bading; Ryan Park; Hargun Sohi; Daniel Procissi; David Colcher; Peter S Conti; Simon R Cherry; Andrew A Raubitschek; Russell E Jacobs
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  In vivo and in vitro validation of reference tissue models for the mGluR(5) ligand [(11)C]ABP688.

Authors:  David Elmenhorst; Luciano Minuzzi; Antonio Aliaga; Jared Rowley; Gassan Massarweh; Mirko Diksic; Andreas Bauer; Pedro Rosa-Neto
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  An MR image-guided, voxel-based partial volume correction method for PET images.

Authors:  Hesheng Wang; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Estimation of the minimum detectable activity of preclinical PET imaging systems with an analytical method.

Authors:  Qinan Bao; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Performance characterization of the Inveon preclinical small-animal PET/SPECT/CT system for multimodality imaging.

Authors:  Keiichi Magota; Naoki Kubo; Yuji Kuge; Ken-Ichi Nishijima; Songji Zhao; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  PET Performance Evaluation of an MR-Compatible PET Insert.

Authors:  Yibao Wu; Ciprian Catana; Richard Farrell; Purushottam A Dokhale; Kanai S Shah; Jinyi Qi; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 1.679

7.  A simplified synthesis of the hypoxia imaging agent 2-(2-Nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl)-N-(2,2,3,3,3-[(18)F]pentafluoropropyl)-acetamide ([18F]EF5).

Authors:  Satish K Chitneni; Gerald T Bida; Mark W Dewhirst; Michael R Zalutsky
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  An assessment of the effects of shell cross-linked nanoparticle size, core composition, and surface PEGylation on in vivo biodistribution.

Authors:  Xiankai Sun; Raffaella Rossin; Jeffrey L Turner; Matthew L Becker; Maisie J Joralemon; Michael J Welch; Karen L Wooley
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.988

9.  Performance evaluation of the Philips MOSAIC small animal PET scanner.

Authors:  Marc C Huisman; Sybille Reder; Axel W Weber; Sibylle I Ziegler; Markus Schwaiger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Integrated software environment based on COMKAT for analyzing tracer pharmacokinetics with molecular imaging.

Authors:  Yu-Hua Dean Fang; Pravesh Asthana; Cristian Salinas; Hsuan-Ming Huang; Raymond F Muzic
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.