Scatter characterization and correction for simultaneous multiple small-animal PET imaging.

PURPOSE: The rapid growth and usage of small-animal positron emission tomography (PET) in molecular imaging research has led to increased demand on PET scanner's time. One potential solution to increase throughput is to scan multiple rodents simultaneously. However, this is achieved at the expense of deterioration of image quality and loss of quantitative accuracy owing to enhanced effects of photon attenuation and Compton scattering. The purpose of this work is, first, to characterize the magnitude and spatial distribution of the scatter component in small-animal PET imaging when scanning single and multiple rodents simultaneously and, second, to assess the relevance and evaluate the performance of scatter correction under similar conditions.
METHODS: The LabPET™-8 scanner was modelled as realistically as possible using Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission Monte Carlo simulation platform. Monte Carlo simulations allow the separation of unscattered and scattered coincidences and as such enable detailed assessment of the scatter component and its origin. Simple shape-based and more realistic voxel-based phantoms were used to simulate single and multiple PET imaging studies. The modelled scatter component using the single-scatter simulation technique was compared to Monte Carlo simulation results. PET images were also corrected for attenuation and the combined effect of attenuation and scatter on single and multiple small-animal PET imaging evaluated in terms of image quality and quantitative accuracy.
RESULTS: A good agreement was observed between calculated and Monte Carlo simulated scatter profiles for single- and multiple-subject imaging. In the LabPET™-8 scanner, the detector covering material (kovar) contributed the maximum amount of scatter events while the scatter contribution due to lead shielding is negligible. The out-of field-of-view (FOV) scatter fraction (SF) is 1.70, 0.76, and 0.11% for lower energy thresholds of 250, 350, and 400 keV, respectively. The increase in SF ranged between 25 and 64% when imaging multiple subjects (three to five) of different size simultaneously in comparison to imaging a single subject. The spill-over ratio (SOR) increases with increasing the number of subjects in the FOV. Scatter correction improved the SOR for both water and air cold compartments of single and multiple imaging studies. The recovery coefficients for different body parts of the mouse whole-body and rat whole-body anatomical models were improved for multiple imaging studies following scatter correction.
CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude and spatial distribution of the scatter component in small-animal PET imaging of single and multiple subjects simultaneously were characterized, and its impact was evaluated in different situations. Scatter correction improves PET image quality and quantitative accuracy for single rat and simultaneous multiple mice and rat imaging studies, whereas its impact is insignificant in single mouse imaging.